[Tonari no Kaibutsu-kun / My Little Monster] - 7
If you'll excuse my rudeness, I'd just like to compose my thoughts on this episode and how I feel about the series so far. To stop this post from becoming too much of a chore to read I'll put some helpful subheadings on each of the ideas that I'm going to attempt to discuss. This will hopefully make it easier for you to skip over what you don't want to read (such as my entire post) and it might even keep me focused on what I'm trying to say.
Tonari's relationship to the Shoujo genre
In my post on this episode earlier, and in my post for the last episode, I harped on about how closely
Tonari adheres to certain shoujo (by which I mean teenage romance shoujo) tropes despite appearing at first to be a rather different kind of work. In a way the amount of comedy that the show drapes it in allows it be a kind of 'shoujo by stealth' feeding you classic storylines and characters in a different, very attractive, package. In a sense Shizuku, Natsume, Sohei and Oshima aren't that dissimilar from characters that exist in other stories. Oshima, for example, could easily be your prototypical shoujo lead in a
Kimi Ni Todoke-type story. While the show differentiates itself from the crowd by being relatively light hearted at times and filled with gags that doesn't mean that underlying plot is any different from another show of this type, for example the way that the relationship between the two leads develops, or rather fails to develop, over the course of the series.
At first I considered this to be a mark against the show considering how tired I am of that particular genre but then I realised that such an argument doesn't make any sense. There's nothing inherently wrong with most genre conventions, it all depends about how skilfully they are deployed. If you enjoy the end product it doesn't really matter about how the components are constructed to reach that product and I certainly enjoy watching Tonari. Moreover, while there are certain plot elements and character types that appear in shoujo works the differences are not insubstantial. For example, Haru is a fairly deranged lead and his level of social dysfunction is off the charts. The characters, while in some sense pulled from stock-character types, all feel fairly well rounded and the interactions between them are always fun to watch so that certainly counts for something.
Haru's Past
The creator clearly intended for there to be some' 'mystery' surrounding Haru's past that is supposed to intrigue the viewer, however I'm not sure how if I like how the show is parcelling out the information about Haru. At first we're introduced to inability to control his temper, then we're shown how much 'social intelligence', for want of a better word, he lacks. By that I mean that a variety of basic social skills are complete mysteries to him. This obviously begs the question: why didn't he develop them like everyone else? Not going to school surely didn't help him in this regard but there's surely more to it then that.
Just in case you hadn't been paying attention to these questions they introduce Haru's brother and from their interactions we're supposed to infer some kind of unpleasantness occurred during Haru's childhood. Immediately after this we're introduced to Aunt Kyoko, an important person who apparently left a big impression on Haru through her various teachings/lessons about life. It seems odd, therefore, that she only figures into Haru's recollections and thoughts during the course of this particular episode. If she was this important, why does he only start to think about her right now and not earlier? I understand that it was prompted by the photo itself but that's part of the writers construction of the scenario, it doesn't flow naturally from the character. It's not entirely organic for his character to act in this manner and it feels like the writer has decided that this is the right point in the narrative to dole out a few more tidbits about Haru. I suppose this could be considered a minor complaint as the writer clearly structured the story in a certain order so that as we progress through the series we start to learn more about him through these revelation which feel 'satisfying' for the viewer but I am a little bothered by the artificiality of such a technique.
See-Saw
This weeks episode had a rather neat little piece of recurring imagery in the form of a see-saw which is explicitly linked to both Haru and Shizaku.
In Haru's flashback it's the very first thing that appears in the frame of the picture for a brief moment before the rest of the image appears in the background:
For Shizaku it appears at the side of the frame near the bottom of the image, however when she's looking at her exam results and thinking about Haru we cut directly from her flashback to a close up of the sea-saw itself. In both examples the direction draws clear attention to the sea-saw itself.
The symbolism seems relatively straightforward - a sea-saw is construction where two people sit apart from each other and when one person pushes one way the other person reacts by going in the opposite direction. As such it serves as a fairly simple metaphor for people in a relationship where as one person moves in one direction the other person moves in the opposite fashion, and vice versa, nicely encapsulating Haru and Shizaku's relationship.
The only thing which detracts from this piece of imagery is that both sea-saw models are exactly the same, despite being in completely different locations in completely different times. This feels a bit lazy in terms of the art design, but perhaps they wanted to make sure that you "got it".