Luigi Mario
Member
Yes, this is very true. Capcom will be much happier with this entry's performance.From my understanding, fighting game sales tend to be skewed towards the Americas.
Last edited:
Yes, this is very true. Capcom will be much happier with this entry's performance.From my understanding, fighting game sales tend to be skewed towards the Americas.
SFV did 46k the first week on the PS4. The OP looks like 33k on two consoles.Do we know how it compares with the previous release SFV?
As always, thanks Luminoth-4545 for making this week's famitsu sales thread.
It basically sold 1m after that. with 1m player base.
In case you want to see for yourself:1m player base and 1m sales are different, but if they said that after the announce is just fine.
In case you want to see for yourself:
Street Fighter 6 Sells Over 1 Million Units Worldwide!
Capcom Co., Ltd. (Capcom) today announced that Street Fighter 6, the latest title in the storied Street Fighter series, has sold over 1 million units worldwide.www.capcom.co.jp
Alot of 3rd party games dont sell on the switch.Honestly, SF 6 did nothing wrong. You know the single biggest mistake Capcom made for it not to be selling well in Japan now?
Not releasing on the system with 90% of the marketshare in Japan right now. In the Nintendo Switch.
You... can't expect your game to move units if you launch the game for less than 10% of your potential audience. And it may be less than that, since there may be a lot of scalping going around.
Thanks for the great news!I meant in Japan. SF 6 is doing just fine Worldwide.
Switch is a secondary console for main systems. People buy it for their big games.Alot of 3rd party games dont sell on the switch.
you hardly see any company invest AAA 3rd party on the switch.
Switch userbase, ESPECIALLY in Japan, only play certain games, that is the problem.
IR Information : Sales Data - Top Selling Title Sales Units
www.nintendo.co.jp
they only play a certain franchise.....other 3rd party IP is not going to do shit lol, even JRPG is not safe......except for the few ones like xenogears
Switch games sells alot, but it is always the same IP, mario...zelda....metroid..., which all IP owned by Nintendo, so technically Nintendo has their own "unique" fanbase, which is hard to enter by other console competitors.
This is why PS and Xbox consider each other competitor, but never include the switch. The fanbase is too different.
Yes my friends this what makes me mad bout Nintendos makes one good game every years but its best ever so you have to goes backSwitch is a secondary console for main systems. People buy it for their big games.
Same reason customers aren’t buying XboxesWhy aren't playstation owners buying games?
First of all, Xenogears is a 23 year old gane. I know you meant Xenoblade, but that just goes to show that you don't really know what you are talking about.Alot of 3rd party games dont sell on the switch.
you hardly see any company invest AAA 3rd party on the switch.
Switch userbase, ESPECIALLY in Japan, only play certain games, that is the problem.
IR Information : Sales Data - Top Selling Title Sales Units
www.nintendo.co.jp
they only play a certain franchise.....other 3rd party IP is not going to do shit lol, even JRPG is not safe......except for the few ones like xenogears
Switch games sells alot, but it is always the same IP, mario...zelda....metroid..., which all IP owned by Nintendo, so technically Nintendo has their own "unique" fanbase, which is hard to enter by other console competitors.
This is why PS and Xbox consider each other competitor, but never include the switch. The fanbase is too different.
You're welcome?Thanks for the great news!
No its not. The only reason that people need other consoles other than the Switch is because a lot of third party games aren't there. And that's, most of the time, simply due to tecnical constraints.Switch is a secondary console for main systems. People buy it for their big games.
Probably because a lot of those consoles aren't evenbeen bought to be used by japanese. The yen is currently weak, so it makes it especially good to scalp.Why aren't playstation owners buying games?
Well, it clearly doesn't sell well on Sony systems. We have data to say that as a fact. But SF 6 never released on the Switch, so we will never know if it would sell well or not.Lol, let's not kid ourselves. SF6 was not gonna sell well on switch.
I do 100% believe that Capcom will make sure to include most if not all of their backlog on the Switch 2 when it launches, alongside almost all of their new releases, but that's still far away.
It's impressive how he posts the same dumb shit week after week.Yeah... good luck with that
A next gen switch is still a generation behind in specs, developers still ain't gonna prioritise it for new releases.
What's wrong with the Japan numbers for SF6?I meant in Japan. SF 6 is doing just fine Worldwide.
They are scalping them according to Nautilus......Why aren't playstation owners buying games?
No actual proof, but we should just take his word on it.They are scalping them according to Nautilus......
Thanks for the welcome!You're welcome?
The Series S exists, which is much weaker than the X and a PS5, and yet it gets all the games the Series X gets. If the Switch 2 is close enough in real world performance to it, assuming that the Switch 2 sells similary to the Switch(That is headed to be the best selling console of all time), it would just be bad business to ignore it. And Capcom, Square, etc are not known to be bad at their business.Yeah... good luck with that
A next gen switch is still a generation behind in specs, developers still ain't gonna prioritise it for new releases.
Because it is low no matter how you cut it. And putting into perspective: Including digital, it probably did as well as SF 5. Which I think we can all assume is a vastly inferior game when compared(at launch) with SF 6.What's wrong with the Japan numbers for SF6?
Even if we assume only a 50% digital split, that means it would've sold about 65k in Japan week 1.
Considering the game is also on PC and Xbox, Japanese numbers for SF6 don't seem particularly low compared to the worldwide 1 million sales..
Finally we agree on something! Though I should point out that scalping is one of the possible reasons that would explain the PS5 situation in Japan, not necessarily the only one.They are scalping them according to Nautilus......
You're welcome!Thanks for the welcome!
Its not that much weaker and if you honestly think they're going to cram that kind of hardware into a portable and keep it cheap ( Nintendo isn't going to sell it at a loss), I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.The Series S exists, which is much weaker than the X and a PS5, and yet it gets all the games the Series X gets. If the Switch 2 is close enough in real world performance to it, assuming that the Switch 2 sells similary to the Switch(That is headed to be the best selling console of all time), it would just be bad business to ignore it. And Capcom, Square, etc are not known to be bad at their business.
It is much weaker, at least in terms of Teraflops.Its not that much weaker and if you honestly think they're going to cram that kind of hardware into a portable and keep it cheap ( Nintendo isn't going to sell it at a loss), I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
Nintendo hasn't released a console at the same price as its competitors in almost 30 years. They also haven't released hardware comparable to its competitors in 20.It is much weaker, at least in terms of Teraflops.
And who said that the Switch 2 is going to be cheap? I personally believe that the Switch 2 is going to cost, in the best case scenario, 400 dollars. And there is a very real chance that it costs 500 dollars.
Considering that the Switch sold what it did with never cutting the cost of its console, and having a Oled version that costs 350 dollars, that performs the same as the base model and is doing really well, a 400 to 500 dollars Switch 2 that is an improvement over everything the Switch already is will do just fine.
Nintendo also hadn't had a success like the Switch, in terms of hardware numbers and software numbers, in decades(ever since the DS, in fact!)Nintendo hasn't released a console at the same price as its competitors in almost 30 years. They also haven't released hardware comparable to its competitors in 20.
If you honestly think a 400-500 portable is going to do sell as well as the switch, you're beyond crazy.
You're forgetting the part where Nintendo hates selling things at a loss. The last time they did that was with the wii u, not exactly a success. They're not going to be able to sell something at 400,have it be comparable to a ps5 or whatever, and still make a profit per unit. The steam deck( but still less powerful than current gen consoles) is more powerful than the switch and they're losing money on each unit.Nintendo also hadn't had a success like the Switch, in terms of hardware numbers and software numbers, in decades(ever since the DS, in fact!)
So if the Switch 2 properly shows and delivers its value to the consumers, adding it to the goodwill and newfound fanbase created with the Switch(And not messing up anything on the way, especially when it comes to its games), I can easily see them pulling off a more expensive console.
Plus, everyone said a 300 dollars Switch was DOA, and look at where we are.
Who said that they were going to sell at a loss? Unlike the Steam Deck, which is a niche product, Nintendo will buy parts to produce tens of millions of devices and probably get a hefty discount on them.You're forgetting the part where Nintendo hates selling things at a loss. The last time they did that was with the wii u, not exactly a success. They're not going to be able to sell something at 400,have it be comparable to a ps5 or whatever, and still make a profit per unit. The steam deck( but still less powerful than current gen consoles) is more powerful than the switch and they're losing money on each unit.
Regardless, we're going way off topic, so im done here. See you next week.
I agrees because Switch OLED is the mosts expensive and killing the other Switch SKUS we lives in a time where everyones buying high end so we miiiiighht see a decent powerful Switch 2.Who said that they were going to sell at a loss? Unlike the Steam Deck, which is a niche product, Nintendo will buy parts to produce tens of millions of devices and probably get a hefty discount on them.
Plus, they can charge 450 or 500 dollars if 400 ends up not being enough.
Don't see how off topic this is, as we are discussing the future of Japan console market, but fine. If you don't have any arguments left other than insults, that's a good decision to make.
See you next week!
Who said that they were going to sell at a loss? Unlike the Steam Deck, which is a niche product, Nintendo will buy parts to produce tens of millions of devices and probably get a hefty discount on them.
Plus, they can charge 450 or 500 dollars if 400 ends up not being enough.
Don't see how off topic this is, as we are discussing the future of Japan console market, but fine. If you don't have any arguments left other than insults, that's a good decision to make.
See you next week!
Well, obviously whoever Sony moneyhats, it won't be there day one and just when the exclusivity ends.I agrees because Switch OLED is the mosts expensive and killing the other Switch SKUS we lives in a time where everyones buying high end so we miiiiighht see a decent powerful Switch 2.
Are all the third parties gonna be lined up to do business with Nintendos though? I doubts it Sony has them on locks down we see all the moneyhats from the Activision threads
I don't agree, but only time will tell if I'm wrong or right.Unless they launch with multiple SKUs, it will be $400 max.
I don't agree, but only time will tell if I'm wrong or right.
What's wrong with the Japan numbers for SF6?
?I have no doubts that they'll target hardware that's good enough to get ports of modern third party console games and balance that out with battery life and affordability.
What motivating factor would they have to push things further than that? Are we missing some sales data that would suggest that they need to drastically increase the power to sell more games? Do you think Nintendo is reading this thread and feel obligated to prove a few random posters wrong?
My PS Plus/Essential is good till 2032. I always buy around black Friday which there always on sale, or look at CDkeys for cheap. I'll eventually upgrade to premium when it's worth it.
WelceptionYou're welcome!
CONCERN!!!!Not only that, but PS5 hardware sales are DOWN Week over Week.
PS5 hold onnnnnn
Third biggest market in the world and the drop off to fourth place is gigantic. The country also spends more per capita on games than any other country in the world.
Top gaming countries by revenue 2023 | Statista
The United States, China, and Japan are the biggest gaming markets worldwide. The gap to the next-ranked gaming market, South Korea, is almost 18 billion USD.www.statista.com
Japan is very relevant. There will be more PS4s, PS5s and Switches sold in Japan than in any other country except the US.
Digital sales were smaller 7 years ago. I think it is likely that overall sales of SF6 are pretty similar to the sales of SFV.If you ignore the sales comparison of SFV with was a terrible SF overall... and SFV launch in one plataform.
Digital sales were smaller 7 years ago. I think it is likely that overall sales of SF6 are pretty similar to the sales of SFV.
Regardless, my point was it is weird to say Japanese sales are bad and worldwide sales are good, when Japanese sales are in line with worldwide sales.
Yeah, SFV wasn't good, but the average person wouldn't have known that until they actually bought it (especially when we are talking about week 1 sales). Likewise, people wouldn't know that SF6 is better until they buy it.
I don't think there is anything strange about SFV and SF6 having similar launch numbers.
Past history doesn't matter. Prestige on internet forums doesn't matter. It only matters whether the game is big enough to push a significant number of people to buy the platform when it comes out. SF is not that big a franchise.Except that Bayonetta doesn't have a history of selling tens of million of units in previous entries, while SF completely does, as past Street Fighter games did. Also, differently from Bayonetta, Street Fighter is a premier game in its genre, so some expectation comes with the territory. And SF 6 did not change that spectation.
So I don't understand why the surprise when me and most people expected more out of SF 6 release. Was it really that much to expect the PS5 do 50k this week, especially with the glowing reviews, or at least be a tiny bit higher than last week, like 40k? Don't you assume not only that to be a viable option, but also the logical one, given the assumed importance of a mainline SF entry?
And given that SF 6 is a better game by basically every metric, don't you find reasonable to believe that SF 6 sales numbers, at least the launch ones, to be dissapointing, as a higher quality product should have sold much better?And if they are going to sell broadly similar, isn't it reasonable to also assume that that is dissapointing?
It it selling faster than the past one, probably thanks to it being on more platforms.Yes, this is very true. Capcom will be much happier with this entry's performance.
So a couple of things:Alot of 3rd party games dont sell on the switch.
you hardly see any company invest AAA 3rd party on the switch.
Switch userbase, ESPECIALLY in Japan, only play certain games, that is the problem.
IR Information : Sales Data - Top Selling Title Sales Units
www.nintendo.co.jp
they only play a certain franchise.....other 3rd party IP is not going to do shit lol, even JRPG is not safe......except for the few ones like xenogears
Switch games sells alot, but it is always the same IP, mario...zelda....metroid..., which all IP owned by Nintendo, so technically Nintendo has their own "unique" fanbase, which is hard to enter by other console competitors.
This is why PS and Xbox consider each other competitor, but never include the switch. The fanbase is too different.
Based on what? It will be a secondary system for some gamers and the primary system for others, just like PS5 or XBS.Switch is a secondary console for main systems. People buy it for their big games.
With the way OLED is selling and how it has the lowest profit margin, $400 is the absolute minimum it will be.Unless they launch with multiple SKUs, it will be $400 max.
In the UK its first week retail sales were around 6k-7k. I think it'll do better in the Americas.But the question is if the game is getting bad sales on Japan, with it is.
As you mention, today digital sales are far more stronger than when SFV launch, so another point to SFV vs SFVI sales ratio. And another advantage is that SFVI launch in a huge selection of consoles in comparison with SFV.
This is a Famitsu thread after all, so we're talking about Japan sales I suppouse? As soon as the others sales threads get sales figures, we can discuss differents sales around the world.
Both Bandai Namco and Nintendo's financials show how significant the Japanese market is, which proves exactly what me and Walter are saying. Now I do agree with you that in 90%+ of cases, it doesn't make sense to target a game at just the US or just Japan or just France. You should attempt to sell your game in many countries, not just one.
Monster Hunter Rise is a system seller for PS5
2023年5月のPS Storeダウンロードランキング! PS5®は『モンスターハンターライズ』が第1位!
The Japanese console market is too small to commit significant resources.
Sales in Japan
Bandai Namco ¥767 bn ($5.5 bn)
Nintendo ¥365 bn ($2.6 bn)
Which is why Nintendo stock is underperforming
YTD
Nikkei 225 25.46%
Sega Sammy 46.10%
Kadokawa 43.73%
Sony 34.43%
Capcom 32.07%
Konami 30.71%
Bandai Namco 22.87%
Nintendo 11.14%
Square Enix 7.12%
Past history doesn't matter? So we shouldn't have any expectation that the next Zelda shouldn't at the absolute worst, sell at least 1 million in Japan given the past success in Japan? That it can perform as little as 1k or as high as 10 million because the strenght and recognition of IP now suddenly play no part in selling a game in a said franchise? What are we now, rewriting history? And if that was true, if what you said was factually true, then why did you argument earlier in the thread that SF VI performance is pkay due to it selling about as well as SF V, if you just said that past history of previous entries don't matter? You are contradicting yourself.Past history doesn't matter. Prestige on internet forums doesn't matter. It only matters whether the game is big enough to push a significant number of people to buy the platform when it comes out. SF is not that big a franchise.
Expecting a 12k rise in hardware sales because of a Street Fighter game is indeed far far far too much. SFV didn't have anywhere near that impact on PS4, so we should not expect SFVI to have that impact on PS5.
You are assuming far too much importance on Street Fighter when it comes to Japanese sales. Its a Bayonetta-level franchise there.
It it selling faster than the past one, probably thanks to it being on more platforms.
So a couple of things:
1. A lot of third party games come to Switch in Japan and sell better on the platform. They don't reach the highest Nintendo levels, but that's true for 90%+ of games.
2. Sony showed investors this graph showing their two major competitors. Fairly certain the red line is Nintendo
Based on what? It will be a secondary system for some gamers and the primary system for others, just like PS5 or XBS.
With the way OLED is selling and how it has the lowest profit margin, $400 is the absolute minimum it will be.
In the UK its first week retail sales were around 6k-7k. I think it'll do better in the Americas.
Both Bandai Namco and Nintendo's financials show how significant the Japanese market is, which proves exactly what me and Walter are saying. Now I do agree with you that in 90%+ of cases, it doesn't make sense to target a game at just the US or just Japan or just France. You should attempt to sell your game in many countries, not just one.
Nintendo's stock price is based on its performance globally. It has basically nothing to do with the size of the Japanese market and I'm not sure why you would think that