A one year ban is suitable for catching someone cheating in a tournament. Sexual molestation should be a lifetime ban in my opinion. Pretty surprised.
Yeah, that letter went the opposite way from how I expected. It sounds more like "Don't worry, it doesn't even have to be a year! "
Yeah, sadly so.Wow that followup post is (somehow) even worse.
I'd be willing to argue that they shouldn't be the ones to decide on what happens and that welfare issues should be picked up by a group that is solely responsible and accountable for that rather than a group that seems more focused on the number of stocks per round than the amount of perverts in their community.
This is the kind of shit that puts people off going to or taking friends to events.
Wow that followup post is (somehow) even worse.
I'd be willing to argue that they shouldn't be the ones to decide on what happens and that welfare issues should be picked up by a group that is solely responsible and accountable for that rather than a group that seems more focused on the number of stocks per round than the amount of perverts in their community.
This is the kind of shit that puts people off going to or taking friends to events.
Internet has been the judge, jury and the executioner in his case. Justice served?
I personally think he deserves a lot, lot more than a year, but the FGC has always been afraid to fuck over their own. Noel Brown still being a part of anything in the FGC at this point is walking proof.
20 million, jesus. It's hard to fathom that amount of suffering.Okay, so, to give a bit of perspective here, 18% of women in the U.S. have been raped, which works out to about 20 million women.
And that's just rape, which wouldn't include the incident in the OP. And that's excluding the men as well, which is a non-trivial number.
If you consider the amount of people who must be sex offenders given this, you would expect to find them basically everywhere, including here.
The 1 year ban is intended to be a recommendation not a rule to those who weren't involved in the decision. We're not suggesting banning him from locals or competitive play unless those TOs/groups wish to follow suit, and we definitely don't want witch hunts against those who allow Hyuga to play if he decides to do so again in the future.
This group's management arrived at a one year ban because that's what Capcom did in regards to Noel Brown's buttgrab. They consider these incidents to effectively be the same, and sexual assault to be the same as sexual harassment. How severe or how many times it happened is seemingly deemed irrelevant. Wonder where they draw the line for what constitutes a "similar incident?" And now with this update they're essentially saying they're not going to enforce the ban.
This group doesn't seem to know what the hell it's doing. Hopefully other groups and organizations will provide education.
Bear did the a followup post:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sotoah
It's a shame how true this is. That anonymous email she posted is enough proof of it. Some are acting like she's causing a ruckus, but maybe people should stop trying to get away with this filth in the first place?She should, but she won't, because of the culture we live in. There is pressure everywhere for women to just stay quiet and try to move on.
This group's management arrived at a one year ban because that's what Capcom did in regards to Noel Brown's buttgrab. They consider these incidents to effectively be the same, and sexual assault to be the same as sexual harassment. How severe or how many times it happened is seemingly deemed irrelevant. Wonder where they draw the line for what constitutes a "similar incident?" And now with this update they're essentially saying they're not going to enforce the ban.
This group doesn't seem to know what the hell it's doing. Hopefully other groups and organizations will provide education.
Reading that shit, some people care more about a game and a community than the victim and the crime.
Guh. This is a really bad look for the Smash community. I get that they're concerned about the community's reputation, but this was the worst way to attempt to salvage it. I like Smash and I want to see Smash 4 grow because I enjoy watching it, but "We're not really going to punish sex offenders" seems like the wrong direction to take condemnation.
Internet has been the judge, jury and the executioner in his case. Justice served?
Prioritizing the community's reputation as a whole over the safety of individuals seems to be all too common in these cases. When similar things have happened, there are far too many people that were more mad that word of the incident got out than they were that the incident happened.
Unfortunately it mirrors some of the reason this stuff gets papered over and covered up in other contexts---if it puts the family or the community or just an important individual in a bad light, far too many people will prioritize saving face for the individual or group over serving justice or protecting the innocent.
All of it is very sad. I hope the reaction from some of this people don't lead her to change her mind about pressing charges.i saw this story on kotaku and was kind of shocked at the general tone in the comments. fucking heinous losers
I see why Nintendo tried to have Smash removed from evo a few years ago. Not exactly the kind of story they would want their IP attached to. Why doesn't Nintendo get involved with the community or running the event? We saw devs for the other evo games show up and get involved, making announcements, adding to the prize pools, etc.
I think it should be Nintendo's responsibility to run this community and create a safe environment around their game. If they don't step up, then we get this community run by a group of people that seem to care more about the game and the competitive image of their game than their actual player-base or fans.
I see why Nintendo tried to have Smash removed from evo a few years ago. Not exactly the kind of story they would want their IP attached to. Why doesn't Nintendo get involved with the community or running the event? We saw devs for the other evo games show up and get involved, making announcements, adding to the prize pools, etc.
I think it should be Nintendo's responsibility to run this community and create a safe environment around their game. If they don't step up, then we get this community run by a group of people that seem to care more about the game and the competitive image of their game than their actual player-base or fans.
Nintendo is not interested in competitive Smash other than to expose the game to more people.
What? You can't stop them from playing your game but if I'm Nintendo I want nothing to do with being formally or officially associated with fuckwits like this in any way. It's not like Nintendo could somehow stop this kind of thing from happening.
In this case there is zero ambiguity and he literally did two offenses right there. The punishment is a slap on the wrist and in all honesty the guy should probably be doing jail time for what he did. He tried it twice, even if you want to use the ruling from Brown as a guideline it should be a lifetime ban.
It's not about whether or not the victim will press charges, it's about sending a zero tolerance message and a clear deterrent for recurrence.1 year ban seems fine for misconduct at an event. The actual assault can be taken care of in the actual justice system and restraining orders if the girl feels uncomfortable with him attending events in the future.
They can and were going to stop people from playing their game at evo. If Nintendo got involved with running these smash tournaments, then they can make up and enforce their own rules. They could host tournaments out of their own stores, have standings on their website, and control who can and cannot participate.
Or they could ban their game from being officially part of evo entirely if they really want to distance themselves from this community.
It's not about whether or not the victim will press charges, it's about sending a zero tolerance message and a clear deterrent for recurrence.
Because people are stupid and have fucked up priorities? The message this sends is very important for a community already notorious for this kind of shit.If someone isn't scared about going to prison for several years, why would a ban from EVO provide any deterrent?
If someone isn't scared about going to prison for several years, why would a ban from EVO provide any deterrent?