I agree we should have our own unit ranking AND you (and Lyrian, others) should be the one(s) to do it.
I've said forever that I favor a role-based ranking because it is ultimately the most useful for building a team. Whereas a simple letter/number ranking (which aren't really different -- you're just using a different symbol with fewer sub-symbols) tends to favor DPS and Mage units which does not lend itself to utility. It is not useful to know that Noctis is the 3rd best unit in the game. It IS useful to know he's the 3rd best DPS.
Please reconsider just doing this by role! DPS - MAGE - HEALER - TANK - BUFF - DEBUFF - OTHER
Well, I suppose it would be inevitable that with any classification system, that a ranking would eventually occur.
Each unit can have it's own stat/analysis page (as posted previously) and then be ranked by role on a comprehensive page. That shouldn't be hard, if everyone classified by each of their individual aspects and traits.
That said, there would need to be some sort of agreement upon how grades are issues and how ranking order is determined. Otherwise, this is not going to work at all.
For Unit Stats:
SSS - Exceptionally far beyond the average for a unit's star rarity. Nothing else is even remotely close; gamebreakingly so.
SS - Far above average for a unit's star rarity; typically best in class at that stat. (elite-tier unit worthy)
S - Significantly above average; unit is definitely strong in this stat and is notable (1st tier unit worthy)
A - Above average for a unit's star rarity; not exceptionally high but definitely noteworthy (2nd-tier unit worthy)
B - Average; not great, not awful. Average for unit's star rarity. Generally unremarkable.
C - Below average; unit is poor in this stat, below average for unit's star rarity.
D - Exceptionally below average; just plain awful in a given stat.
For role analysis:
SSS - The Best There Ever Was: The Complete Package in a given role. No currently known flaws, demerits, or holes in a unit's base skill set in a role. The unit has no remote equal that can even come close to matching it in a role, even with TMRs.
SS - Best in Class: The general top of the leaderboard in a given role. May not have a perfect skill set for a given role, but currently, there is no one better in the game to perform this role.
S - Top-tier: Solid choice and a general go-to unit for a specific role. May not cover all possible aspects of a role, but is usually a solid first choice for that role. The few holes or weaknesses in skillset could possibly be filled in with TMRs.
A - Second-tier: Unit is reasonably competent at a role and can be reliable in a pinch if a S-tier unit in a role is not available. Unit likely has a one-sided skillset in that role, and could face trouble in that role if that's unit's role is exploited by the enemy.
B - Third-string backup: When all else fails, the unit can somewhat pretend to fill a role. Unit may have basic or limited capabilities in the role, significantly limiting its potential in that role. Unit is capable, but likely has better actions it can be taking in that turn than fulfilling that role.
C - Bad: Unit barely has any capability in a role. Unit may have some very elementary skills in that role, but can't perform that role well at all. Unit should definitely not be attempting to perform this role as it's main role in a party.
D - Non-existent or only available via equipping espers/abilities: Unit wasn't meant at all to fill this role. Has no skills at all in this role, outside of those granted by gear/espers/abilities. Unit should never attempt to fill this role, ever.
Thoughts?