MayauMiao
Member
Just like SE7EN where stand ins were said to be used for Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman from afar.That makes no sense. This is probably for shots from afar.
Last edited:
Just like SE7EN where stand ins were said to be used for Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman from afar.That makes no sense. This is probably for shots from afar.
So Snow White not being White aside... Are they not dwarves either? What is the "magical creature" nonsense?
Soooo…were these people hired after the writers strike? Iger raiding the local community theaters for some cheap talent to bring Disney back in the black
It's a fairytale, not a political agenda.It never made sense to call her "Snow White" if her last name wasn't "White". As a nickname, sure. An ACTUAL name without a surname?? Smh
And if this new Snow White has the surname and is just named Snow without it being about her skin color, then cool.
Naming someone after the color of snow because their skin is pale just never made sense to me. Except as a nickname.
It's a fairytale, not a political agenda.
Once upon a time in midwinter, when the snowflakes were falling from the sky like down, a queen was sitting and sewing at a window which had a frame of black ebony. And as she sewed at the window and glanced up at the snow, she pricked her finger with her needle and three drops of blood fell on to the snow. And because the red looked so beautiful on the white snow, she thought to herself: if only I had a child as white as snow, as red as blood, and as black as the wood in the window frame. Not long afterwards she had a little daughter who was as white as snow, as red as blood, and with hair as black as ebony, and because of that she was called Snow White. And as the child was born, the queen died.
Its just a clever safe sounding name. Better than Wood Black or Blood Red.Never said anything about a political agenda. Just thought it was dumb for the reasons I stated. I don't write with the intention of people reading between the lines.
That said, now that I read what you posted from the story... I can see where the name came from. Though it still seems it's a nickname and not her actual name.
It's a story of fiction, as you said, so it matters not.
Its just a clever safe sounding name. Better than Wood Black or Blood Red.
I was thinking the same. Maybe if this cast was involved in a quirky TV ad for laughs it makes sense. But I find it hard to believe this is real material for a Snow White movie.That photo has to be fake? It can't look that bad even for Disney, can it?
If it is real, wow I just have no words....
That photo has to be fake? It can't look that bad even for Disney, can it?
If it is real, wow I just have no words....
You know norhing John Snow!It never made sense to call her "Snow White" if her last name wasn't "White". As a nickname, sure. An ACTUAL name without a surname?? Smh
And if this new Snow White has the surname and is just named Snow without it being about her skin color, then cool.
Naming someone after the color of snow because their skin is pale just never made sense to me. Except as a nickname.
Maybe. Its a fairytale setting after all. It'll probably all get CGI'ed up in post production.Most movies look like that while shooting... They never look like the finished product.
Suitable name for an eighth dwarf within the current social climate and Disnaey's contemporary media vision.Well.
This looks like it’s going to be a doozy.
Replace two of the dwarves with Eric Andre and Dave Chappelle, and get Jack Black in there for good measure. Box office smash...lolJust a perfectly normal scene in Bedfordshire.
Peter Dinklage put Disney on blast when they announced the movie, so they made them CG creatures instead of Dwarves.So Snow White not being White aside... Are they not dwarves either? What is the "magical creature" nonsense?
Yes because "Grown Men" should never concern themselves with what "there kids" consume.In before a bunch of grown men get worked up over snow white movie targeted for kids
Most movies these days look like that when you take away the CGI, make-up, and post-production touch ups. You'd be amazed by how cheap costumes and sets actually look without all the modern technology applied to it. There is a reason that when you go back to the 80's and beyond you look at "big budget" films looking goofy and fake outside of practical effects. They just didn't have the tech to touch it up in the moment. If you took out all the movie magic out of modern films most of them would look like cheap local productions because all the money is in the CGI and special effects.This looks like some kind of a school theater gig.
I've been on this forum for a long long time now, and I've never seen somebody so relentlessly and consistently defend mega-corporations as much as you. I certainly hope you're paid for it at least. It's like every single thread about Marvel/Star Wars/Disney, you're right there just chiming in on how it's ackshuwally a good thing.Never said anything about a political agenda. Just thought it was dumb for the reasons I stated. I don't write with the intention of people reading between the lines.
That said, now that I read what you posted from the story... I can see where the name came from. Though it still seems it's a nickname and not her actual name.
It's a story of fiction, as you said, so it matters not.
You clearly have not been to the recent Hollywood strike threads lolI've been on this forum for a long long time now, and I've never seen somebody so relentlessly and consistently defend mega-corporations as much as you.
They can’t shoot in the US. There was a story yesterday about how production of House of the Dragon is continuing as normal because it’s shot in the UK. Most fantasy films seem to be shot in Europe or New Zealand.Most likely an old pic (in the last week) because the strike only started yesterday.
Edit: if the script was finished, they can still shoot. But can't now that the SAG-AFTRA is striking.
where is my asian dwarf representative? disney is racist
Taking a "short" break from Foo fighters.Dwarf in the front still looks like Dave Grohl.
Most movies these days look like that when you take away the CGI, make-up, and post-production touch ups. You'd be amazed by how cheap costumes and sets actually look without all the modern technology applied to it. There is a reason that when you go back to the 80's and beyond you look at "big budget" films looking goofy and fake outside of practical effects. They just didn't have the tech to touch it up in the moment. If you took out all the movie magic out of modern films most of them would look like cheap local productions because all the money is in the CGI and special effects.
Which sucks because you used to have older films that looked great because they put in the effort, but those days are mostly long gone outside of people like Nolan.
Or to put it another way: Peter Dinklage acted like a holier than thou ass when Disney announced the movie, so they took six roles away from a group of actors who find it very difficult to find roles in the first place.Peter Dinklage put Disney on blast when they announced the movie, so they made them CG creatures instead of Dwarves.
The daily mail making up shit ?‘Snow White’ Set Pics Stir Anti-Woke Criticism
Disney initially claimed the pictures from the live-action set were “fake” but later backtracked.www.thedailybeast.com
Daily Mail posting some fake shit I guess lol
I was thinking the same. Maybe if this cast was involved in a quirky TV ad for laughs it makes sense. But I find it hard to believe this is real material for a Snow White movie.
‘Snow White’ Set Pics Stir Anti-Woke Criticism
Disney initially claimed the pictures from the live-action set were “fake” but later backtracked.www.thedailybeast.com
Daily Mail posting some fake shit I guess lol
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that after Disney’s U.S. spokesperson initially declared the photos published by the Daily Mail were fake, the studio later said the photos were from the production but were not official photos