Jeff Spicoli
Member
That 7 "dwarves" are really ugly.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
First images from Disney remake of Snow White and the Seven "Dwarves"
- Thread starter DanteFox
- Start date
GutsOfThor
Member
Someone add a Brazzers logo on that pic 
GymWolf
Gold Member
Can't you just watch the porn parody like every normal dude?
22:22:22
NO PAIN TRANCE CONTINUE
After all our exchanges and my posts you're still considering there's any resemblance of normalcy left in me?
Thank you
Kidding aside. I want to watch it for it's subtext.
Also, on second thought; what's so normal about watching midget porn?
Last edited:
GymWolf
Gold Member
No one is really normal in this world.
After all our exchanges and my posts you're still considering there's any resemblance of normalcy left in me?
Thank you
Kidding aside. I want to watch it for it's subtext.
Also, on second thought; what's so normal about watching midget porn?
22:22:22
NO PAIN TRANCE CONTINUE
NecrosaroIII
Ultimate DQ Fan
I want these 7 dwarves.
Upper_Management
Member
In b4 dwarf social media outrage.
StealthGoblin
Banned
That looks like a stag do photo in cheap clothes.
Chuck Berry
Gold Member
JimmyRustler
Member
Hilarious. You can’t make this shit up. Want it to be real. It’s gotta be.
JCK75
Member
My other problem with this movie is that while the girl playing Snow White is an attractive girl.. I'm supposed to find her more attractive than The evil Queen played by Gal Gadot? That's some really bad casting (the casting of Gal.. finding someone hotter than her is not going to be easy)
OmegaSupreme
advanced basic bitch
Who knows if that aspect will even be a part of this. This is updated for "modern audiences." Maybe the evil queen will just be a misunderstood girl boss held back the patriarchy and Snow "White" and her must team up to take down the awful men.
diffusionx
Gold Member
This story is so funny. I am not sure I have ever seen this before. Like, pics from a production come out that are so hilariously and obviously bad that the studio *running the production* tries to disavow them.
Toons
Member
...thats how they got their business in the first place lol
Sure there is.
Ignore Dinklage.
They could go on a positive PR blitz with other dwarf actors talking about how these roles keep them working and how rare it is for a dwarf actor to semi break out of dwarf roles like Dinklage has a few times. Or just do the perspective photography thing with normal actors. Hell, just have 2D animated dwarves mixed with a live action Snow White, that shit ALWAYS works and no worry about creepy CG versions!
But really, just ignore the fool.
Ulysses 31
Member
Dwarf actor calling out Peter Dinklage pulling up the ladder for those after him.
Last edited:
DeaDPo0L84
Member
I love the old Disney, when me and my wife have our first child I'm gonna use them as an excuse to re-watch all the old classics. The current stuff though...nah we good.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
LOL. Dont you love it when different groups argue with one another when they're supposed to be banded together as a united front? Well, that's what happens when one segment of that giant group has a power trip and tries to take over. And let's face it, out of all the social media cancel culture and progressives, I dont get the sense the dwarf community gets any attention at all. Only thing I've heard is Peter Dinklage speaking out like he's the ruler of all small people.
Btw, the dwarf guy is 100% right. In a role like that, it's not about who can be the best actor like two similar sized dudes going after a traditional part. May the best actor for the budget win. But he has enough common sense bringing up someone like him isnt suited for a 6 ft 4 beefy guy part. And everyone knows that too. But for specialized parts like elves, dwarves and any little person role, just hire actors who have the talent to do the part at the needed size too within budget.
But hey, if the director wants to take the film into a different direction, then so be it.
Last edited:
Lukaku's First Touch
Member
You saying that everyone looks like a giant from a dwarves perspective?
GymWolf
Gold Member
I mean, they just need to find a chick with an actual breast or ass, how hard it can be?
GymWolf
Gold Member
Dinklage is a dick, it showed his true colors in more than one occasion.
Salz01
Member
The guy on the right isn’t too smart. Not sure why he agreed to go on that show. Lol. Of course any good actor gay man can get way more roles, and play it straight or gay. There are countless examples going back to the 60’s….. but a person thats vertically challenged can not just get any role.
ShadowNate
Member
"... that's when the Snow White met the 7 dwarfs---"
"mom, what's a dwarf"
"oh, eh, ...just random people from the 70s"
"mom, what's a dwarf"
"oh, eh, ...just random people from the 70s"
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
In a nutshell, most people are self serving. Especially politically motivated people. They might try painting a picture of the greater good but really it’s about them and them only.
Sometimes you got to look at the greater good of anyone involved. And for something like acting parts for dwarf actors, it’s such a niche part of society and jobs, just let them have it. As long as the quality of work and budgets work out, no need to ruffle feathers going against the grain with a political slant adjusting it. It’s not about a pity plea or anything. But if something works (It seems pretty plausible and smooth sailing to me to hire dwarf actors looking for work for dwarf parts), then just continue it.
Last edited:
BlackTron
Member
Glorious times when Disney, Nintendo and Capcom were at the top of their game and combo'd up. It was like you could trust the machinations of the system to work and even buy a game blind for the IP and it might actually be good. LOL imagine
The reason movies look like they do is mainly because they are shot on film or equivalent digital format (speciffic framerates and shutter speeds), they use custom lighting and filters for every single shot, they use creative angles and shallow depth of field. It has nothing to do with CGI and other elements.
As bad as the actual scripts and acting may be in some Hollywood movies these days, they are still top tier in terms of the film look.
thefool
Member
Obviously. Who the fuck is Dinklage to set whatever standards anyone should abide for. If he dislikes it, he should do what anyone who dislikes something can do, not consume it.
I moved forward and there's a guy saying gay actors are not being employed by hollywood (lol) and that's why gay characters should only be played by gay people.
I dunno, there is definitely something lost in the mix with the move to digital. I don't need that super rich technicolor feel of the 50-60's but digital allows too much use of natural lighting leading to murky scenes and the small, lighter cameras give way to that shaky cam nonsense which fortunately seems to be dying out a little. I even think that some film grain and stutter gives a film the slightly surreal quality it needs compared to a razor sharp HFR film image. And this is without the excessive use of lens flare and light bloom added in digitally....ahem J.J. Abrams...
But CG DEFINITELY causes problems when it isn't used as a 1:1 replacement of stunt and film work. If the "camera" zooms around through digital peoples legs, through digital walls, and catches movement in ways a real camera team can't it screws with our perception of the event and makes it feel fake. Now with drones I expect some wild shots but you can tell when a master director (like Cameron) stages his digital stuff to mimic what would be a brutal real stunt versus the guys just playing with the CG like it was a video game. Naturally the Cruise missile does it best by having actors experiencing real world wind/g-forces/tumbling and then adds digital to hide the safety gear versus doing it all with virtual dolls.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Cgi is best used in situations that involve static images or things move slow and not too crazy. If someone wants to do cgi to make great looking alien rocks and space colonies in orbit with metal construction and neon lights it’ll probably be pretty good and create a good atmosphere.
If someone did a terminator movie with a similar grounded look as the old movies but used cgi to make ultra realistic looking robots that moved clunky it would be better. But what do you get instead?
cgi amped up into crazy flowing sky battles with zipping and zooming spaceships that defy physics and cgi spider terminators zapping people at light speed. It resembles a video game more than a believable world. That scene in dark fate of rows or terminators coming out of the ocean looked terrible. Way too techie and gamey looking.
ForAcademicPurposes
Member
It's called Snow White because her skin is white. It's the title of the movie.
Hudo
Member
Might as well call it "Snow White Power" according to Twitter.It's called Snow White because her skin is white. It's the title of the movie.
MayauMiao
Member
If by miracle Disney decides to replace the 7 identity crisis with dwarves, Peter Dinklage would be a perfect Grumpy.
Last edited:
Fuz
Banned
Are they, though?
How well did the black mermaid do, at the box office?
Ulysses 31
Member
(Doesn't include Dial of Destiny)
Woke Disney Lost Almost $900 Million On Last 8 Films: Report
A well-known film box office analyst estimates that in the last 12 months, Disney, whose woke agenda has placed it at odds with much of the general public, lost nearly $900 million on its last eight releases. YouTube Financial analyst Valliant Renegade measured the performances of “Lightyear,”...
Record Decline: Why Disney+ Lost Another 4 Million Subscribers
Disney+ declines deepen in first three months of the year, marking its second straight quarter of decline. Subscriptions in India are way down following loss of key cricket package.
www.forbes.com
The company's also 49 Billion in debt.
Last edited:
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Wow. I never kept track of Disney subs but knew enough it was huge. But I didn't know they are already trending down in subs. Losing sub count two quarters in a row is not a good sign. Its so new they should still be in ramp up mode. The service isnt even 4 years old.(Doesn't include Dial of Destiny)
Woke Disney Lost Almost $900 Million On Last 8 Films: Report
A well-known film box office analyst estimates that in the last 12 months, Disney, whose woke agenda has placed it at odds with much of the general public, lost nearly $900 million on its last eight releases. YouTube Financial analyst Valliant Renegade measured the performances of “Lightyear,”...www.dailywire.com
Record Decline: Why Disney+ Lost Another 4 Million Subscribers
Disney+ declines deepen in first three months of the year, marking its second straight quarter of decline. Subscriptions in India are way down following loss of key cricket package.
The company's also 49 Billion in debt.
Last edited:
LimanimaPT
Member
Really? Gal Gadot is going to be the queen? That mirror must be pretty dumb if he finds snow white to be prettier then the queen. This is a fail right here.
Cyberpunkd
Member
Not if the idea is to :
1. Subvert the “tropes”
2. “The queen was just misunderstood” #bothsides #moralrelativismislit
3. Simp potential
Panajev2001a
GAF's Pleasant Genius
Snow White guilt rebrand.
Similar threads
- Locked