CassidyIzABeast
Member
Anybody that's every been in a barber shop run by older black men know how spot on Arsenio Hall eating out of that plate is.
I think it can be widely agreed upon that by the time those fights happened Tyson wasn't anywhere close to the same fighter he was in the 80s. Tyson's prime as a pro boxer was incredibly short and a lot of that can be blamed on Don King along with Tyson himself. But after leaving his manager for King and later cutting ties with Cus D'Amano's guys who trained him while and after Cus died on King's influence Tyson wasn't the same and that's before going into the 90s.
I'd be willing to wager had D'Amano been 20 years younger or at least lived another 10 or so years Tyson life and career would've been quite different.
Not really, no. Tyson's decline had nothing to do with age.Sure, but the same could be said for Lewis and Holyfield. Tyson was younger than both of them. He was 4 years younger than Holyfield, and Holyfield beat him twice.
I'll take decisive wins over 12 round decisions.
What that tells me is you dominated your opponent as opposed to your opponent being able to take you to the limit.
Sure, but the same could be said for Lewis and Holyfield. Tyson was younger than both of them. He was 4 years younger than Holyfield, and Holyfield beat him twice.
The key with this debate is are we measuring Career Accomplishments?
In which case, Holyfield + Lewis outpace Tyson.
Or are we making the Head to Head, Peak vs. Peak, argument?
That's where Tyson has a case.
88' Tyson with Kevin Rooney is a force of nature that would have a shot at anyone prime for prime in heavyweight history.
The incredible speed of a middleweight at heavyweight, devastating mid range knock out power, intimidation, peek a boo style Cus D'Amato defense bobbing and weaving, puncing in combinations, going for body shots. A complete offense force.
Having said that, even at his peak, Tyson showed things that could arguably by exploited by a great fighter.
James "Quick" Tillis fight showed that a fighter that could stick, move, and jab Tyson could land on him. Tillis certainly is no hall of fame fighter, and Tyson still clearly controlled and won that fight convincingly on the cards.....but imagine a 66' Ali in that spot.
The reach advantage would be enormous for Ali.
Tyson would always have a chance to Joe Frazier Ali ala round 15 in the fight of the century, but I think if they fought a trilogy, Ali beats him by decision 2 out of 3 times, Tyson possibly catches him and puts his away in the other.
Tyson vs. Holmes? Larry was past it when they fought and coming off a long layoff, but Cus D'Amato was always convinced that Tyson matched up really well with Larry, so that's good enough for me peak vs. peak.
Tyson vs. Lennox Lewis? Their 2002 has no value whatsoever in predicting a prime vs prime matchup, simply because Tyson was medicated, 20 pounds overweight, and shot to pieces. It's only useful from a simple.......wow, Lewis is a lot bigger than Tyson in the ring and has a sizable reach advantage.
Prime Tyson gets Lewis out of there in the first 5 rounds, McCall is one thing.....but then to happen again against Hasim Rahman? That's enough for me to believe Tyson catches that chin and puts him out. If Lewis gets past rd 5, he'd have a legit chance, but I dont see it.
Tyson v Holyfield? 88' Tyson v 93' Holyfield (2nd Bowe fight) or 90' Holyfield (Buster Douglas). Great, great fight. One thing I guarantee is that Tyson isn't stopping Holyfield, who had one of the best chins in heavyweight history, too much heart on that man.
So I see Tyson by decision, Holyfield by decision, or Holyfield by TKO/KO (ala 96' actual first fight result).
Ultimately, I give Holyfield the edge....he's uniquely suited to beat Tyson.
Incredible heart and chin, great counterpuncher, threw beautiful combinations and had a high workrate in his prime (see the Dokes fight), could tag Tyson with his jab.
Plus mentally, Holyfield is stronger than Tyson.
Holyfield wins 2 out of 3 in a trilogy.
The key with this debate is are we measuring Career Accomplishments?
In which case, Holyfield + Lewis outpace Tyson.
Or are we making the Head to Head, Peak vs. Peak, argument?
That's where Tyson has a case.
88' Tyson with Kevin Rooney is a force of nature that would have a shot at anyone prime for prime in heavyweight history.
The incredible speed of a middleweight at heavyweight, devastating mid range knock out power, intimidation, peek a boo style Cus D'Amato defense bobbing and weaving, puncing in combinations, going for body shots. A complete offense force.
Having said that, even at his peak, Tyson showed things that could arguably by exploited by a great fighter.
James "Quick" Tillis fight showed that a fighter that could stick, move, and jab Tyson could land on him. Tillis certainly is no hall of fame fighter, and Tyson still clearly controlled and won that fight convincingly on the cards.....but imagine a 66' Ali in that spot.
The reach advantage would be enormous for Ali.
Tyson would always have a chance to Joe Frazier Ali ala round 15 in the fight of the century, but I think if they fought a trilogy, Ali beats him by decision 2 out of 3 times, Tyson possibly catches him and puts his away in the other.
Tyson vs. Holmes? Larry was past it when they fought and coming off a long layoff, but Cus D'Amato was always convinced that Tyson matched up really well with Larry, so that's good enough for me peak vs. peak.
Tyson vs. Lennox Lewis? Their 2002 has no value whatsoever in predicting a prime vs prime matchup, simply because Tyson was medicated, 20 pounds overweight, and shot to pieces. It's only useful from a simple.......wow, Lewis is a lot bigger than Tyson in the ring and has a sizable reach advantage.
Prime Tyson gets Lewis out of there in the first 5 rounds, McCall is one thing.....but then to happen again against Hasim Rahman? That's enough for me to believe Tyson catches that chin and puts him out. If Lewis gets past rd 5, he'd have a legit chance, but I dont see it.
Tyson v Holyfield? 88' Tyson v 93' Holyfield (2nd Bowe fight) or 90' Holyfield (Buster Douglas). Great, great fight. One thing I guarantee is that Tyson isn't stopping Holyfield, who had one of the best chins in heavyweight history, too much heart on that man.
So I see Tyson by decision, Holyfield by decision, or Holyfield by TKO/KO (ala 96' actual first fight result).
Ultimately, I give Holyfield the edge....he's uniquely suited to beat Tyson.
Incredible heart and chin, great counterpuncher, threw beautiful combinations and had a high workrate in his prime (see the Dokes fight), could tag Tyson with his jab.
Plus mentally, Holyfield is stronger than Tyson.
Holyfield wins 2 out of 3 in a trilogy.
Tyson's career record is 50-6 with 44 KOs. How is he not in the running for Top 5? I'd probably take Prime Tyson against anyone, except for Ali
Who's first according to Money Mayweather?
Well himself, of course!
1 Floyd Mayweather W 48 L 0
2 Roberto Duran W 103 L 16
3 Pernell Whitaker W 40 L 4 D 1
4 Julio Cesar Chavez W 107 L 6 D 2
5 Muhammad Ali W 56 L 5
http://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...-muhammad-ali-in-his-list-of-best-ever-boxers
No Marvelous Marvin Hagler? Fuck outta here.
Here is Skip Bayless' and Stephen A Smith's reactions to this from First Take.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=13416646
*edit* Funny enough, Tyson is even referenced in this clip about how people say how feared Tyson was in his prime, when in fact George Foreman was easily the most feared fighter.
This is my new favorite gif.
Great post!
What do you think about prime Joe Frazier vs prime Tyson?
Joe had such a tremendous heart. I hate how Ali treated him.
You ever watch Ike Ibeabuchi fight before he went to prison?
Willie Pep fought over 200...At over 100 fights I'm surprised Duran doesn't have dementia pugilistica or something around those lines.
Willie Pep fought over 200...
I have no problem with Floyd putting Duran at #2. Greatest lightweight ever.
Tyson is not a top 5 fighter, it's even a stretch to call him a top 5 heavyweight.
A prime Larry Holmes was better and would have mopped the floor with him.
Not that ridiculous, not as ridiculous as putting Whittaker in the top five.
Here is Skip Bayless' and Stephen A Smith's reactions to this from First Take.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=13416646
*edit* Funny enough, Tyson is even referenced in this clip about how people say how feared Tyson was in his prime, when in fact George Foreman was easily the most feared fighter.
I actually thought the funniest part was the poster's name in connection to the post. The comment itself isn't that bad.Not that ridiculous, not as ridiculous as putting Whittaker in the top five.
Not every fighter is going to have KO power
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWuBdlEPOzo
117 wins only 14 knockouts, and 4 losses, you're a bad man when your nickname is "The Untouchable"
Yes I have, Ike's fight with David Tua was an excellent fight, very close, Ike showed a lot of promise, could take Tua's punches which was no small feat, and power of his own to boot. 6'2, 76 in reach, he had potential.
I never watched his fight with Chris Byrd but Byrd was a tricky fighter so that kind of result shows that Ike had the ability to handle different styles of fighters.
If he hadn't gotten into trouble, you have to figure either Lewis meets him (Ike turned down a fight against Michael Grant at one point) or certainly one or both of the Klitschkos would've had to have fought him.
With as anemic as the heavyweights have been post Lewis, sans Klitschko brothers, Ike could've easily been right in the mix for the heavyweight title.
The what ifs in boxing will drive you crazy..............like what if Bowe doesn't throw the WBC belt in the trash after beating Holyfield in 92....and Lewis/Bowe actually fight in 93?
What if they rematch in 95 when Lewis had Emmanuel Steward?)
Spoiler alert - Bowe was too polished for Lewis in 93 imo, he beats him in a more explosive version of Lewis/Vitali imo, except Bowe finishes the job against the more open, sloppier, hittable Lewis in 9 or 10 rounds.
Lewis with Manny Steward? With Bowe starting to fade but still good in 95? Lewis beats Bowe by decision. Manny really cleaned up Lewis's defense + footwork, built his base up more, got Lewis to stop pawing with him jab so much, really turned him into a great boxer.
96' and on? Lewis obviously murders Bowe (Exhibit A - Andrew Golota vs. both men).
Not that ridiculous, not as ridiculous as putting Whittaker in the top five.
This is one of the most beautiful performances I've ever seen in boxing. That man is incredible![]()
Ike would have been champion at some point, his workrate for a heavyweight was just incredible, never saw someone his size apply so much pressure and constant movement. That chin, workrate and outright power would have been way too much for early Wlad to handle, I watched the Byrd fight and that was one of the more brutal knockouts I've seen.
![]()
You should post in the boxing thread
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=154705
Not every fighter is going to have KO power
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWuBdlEPOzo
117 wins only 14 knockouts, and 4 losses, you're a bad man when your nickname is "The Untouchable"
Woulda, shoulda coulda.. the fact is you don't know.. Ike was a giant piece of shit of a human being.
He fought 2 guys with a pulse in his career.. and Tua is the most overrated HW of the last 30 years.. but his Byrd victory is pretty legit.. though Byrd was outweighed by 40lbs.. and Byrd came back better from the fight.
Thing is, who knows what would have happened if Ike fought as big and talented as him. We don't know, because it never happened.
Rating Ike is stupid, because he was still untested.
Tyson top 5?
Yeah, no.
Nintendo already decided who is best. I don't see any Floyd Mayweather's Punch-Out!!.
![]()
Sidebar: Was that the first and only time Nintendo has used a celebrity in a game's title or to be a character in a game?
Ken Griffey Presents Major League Baseball for the SNES.