Same. Though, I think I get sick of it after 2 pieces rather than actually being full.When I eat a normal 2 or 3 piece meal, I'm pretty full.
Same. Though, I think I get sick of it after 2 pieces rather than actually being full.When I eat a normal 2 or 3 piece meal, I'm pretty full.
I get the sense that the purpose of this "review" was to give the author an excuse to mock poor people.
But where's the chicken???
I didn't get that impression at all.
Goddamn you people with your all-you-can-eat-KFC, take-it-for-granted blasé attitudes... stop making me jealous.
My town has both a buffet KFC and a buffet Bojangles.
We have a fat town.
are you on the west coast, or do el pollo locos exist outside of california and oregon?
either way, i can go for some el pollo loco
Whoa, nice write-up. I used to go to KFC buffet all the time as a kid. It was way better than that though, they had a bunch of shit. I don't remember anything weird out of the customers either, but this was the early 90's, when civilized people still ate at KFC once in awhile.
Oh, and KFC > Popeye's dry-ass garbage
Oh, and KFC > Popeye's dry-ass garbage
this.i'd spend twice as much on regular priced Popeyes before paying anything all-you-can-eat KFC.
Kennedy's is awesome and so ghetto. Always thought they were in ny only.You got a point there
But pop eyes has better sides
Both have bad fried chicken though
Wished there was a real fried chicken joint
Actually the best fried chicken I ever got was from here
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_Fried_Chicken
The most ghetto ass fried chicken joint but its better the. KFC or pop eyes
i'd spend twice as much on regular priced Popeyes before paying anything all-you-can-eat KFC.
Oh, and KFC > Popeye's dry-ass garbage
How much fried chicken can one person actually eat in one sitting ????
Its almost like people have different opinions or something.what???
Popeye's far superior.
Yessss.Give me all you can eat Popeye's for $7.99 and we'll talk.
I will note that many of these locations are run by franchisees, and thus the quality can vary wildly between different locations of even the same brand.Its almost like people have different opinions or something.
Quality shouldn't vary wildly at all. Most places get the same stuff delivered to them, cooked in mostly the same sort of equipment in mostly the same way. Franchises dont want a large difference in quality between places. They might offer different selections to suit different demographics, but you should be able to get some KFC in Oklahoma and expect it to be pretty much the same chicken you get in a KFC in Virginia.I will note that many of these locations are run by franchisees, and thus the quality can vary wildly between different locations of even the same brand.
I have a very nice Popeye's by my office, and I go there every Tuesday for the above-mentioned deal. It's delicious.
what???
Popeye's far superior.
This sort of comment is just as bad as all those snobs who talk about how Taco Bell is garbage and that people who eat there dont know what a REAL taco is, even though many probably do. Its ok to like cheap, fast food variants of stuff.Basically. I more of a scientific fact than opinion at this point. If you know what good fried chicken tastes like you wouldn't settle for KFC.
Come at me.
somebody throw this person out of neogaf.
Come at me.
It's the "mostly the same way" that's in question here.Quality shouldn't vary wildly at all. Most places get the same stuff delivered to them, cooked in mostly the same sort of equipment in mostly the same way. Franchises dont want a large difference in quality between places. They might offer different selections to suit different demographics, but you should be able to get some KFC in Oklahoma and expect it to be pretty much the same chicken you get in a KFC in Virginia.
Some people just dont like Popeyes or KFC's chicken in general. I doubt its usually a case of, "Oh, you probably just went to a bad location."
Why? you will die in a shootout anyway.
Sometimes, but not usually. Food does not differ wildly for most big chain places. These places may not always have the most competent employees, but its not hard for most of them to follow directions for stuff.It's the "mostly the same way" that's in question here.
Sometimes you have employees that overcook the chicken, or add too much salt, or what-have-you.
I know the McDonald's by my house has very different chicken nuggets than the one by my work place... Same ingredients and all.
2 piece and a biscuit is not a game.Dat warzone.
2 piece and a biscuit is not a game.
#3 "Free food is good food!"When it comes to food, Their are 2 sayings. You are what you eat and you get what you paid for.
Quality shouldn't vary wildly at all. Most places get the same stuff delivered to them, cooked in mostly the same sort of equipment in mostly the same way. Franchises dont want a large difference in quality between places. They might offer different selections to suit different demographics, but you should be able to get some KFC in Oklahoma and expect it to be pretty much the same chicken you get in a KFC in Virginia.
Some people just dont like Popeyes or KFC's chicken in general. I doubt its usually a case of, "Oh, you probably just went to a bad location."
Oh nah, there are vast differences based on the level of staffing at these places. At least in NY where locations vary to the extremes. It can be as simple as the fry girl having a higher tolerance for sodium, so she coats the fries twice with salt, or some ass that loves ketchup on everything, those guys have heavy hands on the sauces and usually prepare a messy sandwich. Big differences between locations that are busy and slow, big differences in how "nice" the location is. McDs in midtown is way better than the one in Bushwick Brooklyn.