Broder Salsa
Banned
Chelsea took 4 m8
Das before people and mourinho realized how shit you really were
Chelsea took 4 m8
Anybody can drop out of the top 4 next season, that's what makes the league so exciting.
Das before people and mourinho realized how shit you really were
Still can't believe you played 6 midfielders against us :lol
We were there for the taking bb!
Who would Carvahlo replace? Fellaini?
Carvalho is expensive but if he becomes Viera or Yaya Toure then he was worth every penny. Plus we could then sell him to PSG or Madrid for double.
Carvalho is expensive but if he becomes Viera or Yaya Toure then he was worth every penny. Plus we could then sell him to PSG or Madrid for double.
De Gea.
Raf. Jones. CB. Shaw.
Mata. Willy C. Kagawa.
Winger. Rooney. Januzaj.
Man United weren't the biggest club in the country when Ferguson took over. Meulensteen comparing Ferguson taking over United in the 80s to Moyes taking over now is so ridiculously stupid.
Circumstances are completely different.
He's still right. We all heard how Moyes likes to go all hands on. See how well that has worked.
I hope we don’t try to do too much this summer. We should identify the most urgent areas of concern, which are pretty obvious, and pursue players there. For me this would be a LB, CB, and 2 CM’s. We can’t “retool” the squad in just one window. And it’s impossible to get every signing right. If we have this apparent £200m, don’t spend it all in one go. I also think that whilst our squad is lacking, it isn’t as bad as people have been suggesting and we can get a lot more out of it. And not on a, Fergie gets every drop of blood out of his players sense. Jones, Smalling, Welbeck, Rafael. These guys are young and talented players. They might not be the best talents but they have hardly improved in the last 3 seasons and that means the coaching and opportunities haven’t been right for them. I might be way off but I think there’s a chance to bring these guys along in a new team with some support brought in around them.
Didn't Ferguson also get more time to grow accustomed to the position than Moyes? I think replacing existing staff with your own should not be the issue, that's pretty common.
Top 4 is almost certainly locked for next season, barring absurd transfer windows.
The issue is age. United fell out of the top 4 because they had a decrepit team which suddenly saw a massive decline in key areas. Neither Arsenal nor Liverpool have problems in this area.
Then, when you consider Liverpool could easily have had 4 players in the YPOTY, and Arsenal lag not far behind, both teams could remain fairly static and yet still see little to no downturn.
And they won't remain static. United are left with a big challenge - they both have continuing aging in certain areas whilst the top 4 teams improve. Whilst Moyes may have been to blame for some of the players failings, the problem with elderly players - i.e. RVP and Carrick - is you can't really undo the damage that has been done.
So it's not just the issue that United have to recover, 10-15 points on Arsenal or Liverpool. It's really more like 20 points, since United will pretty much be down 3-5 whilst Arsenal and Liverpool will be up that amount, simply through natural aging. Everton and Spurs face a similar challenge, of course, without the negative points but also lacking the immense transfer resources that could make up such a difference.
Moyes learned his fate when the story broke on various newspaper websites on Monday and is particularly unhappy about the way it was handled. He had a brief conversation with the club's press officer, Karen Shotbolt, but nobody in a senior position contacted him for the rest of the day.
Top 4 is almost certainly locked for next season, barring absurd transfer windows.
The issue is age. United fell out of the top 4 because they had a decrepit team which suddenly saw a massive decline in key areas. Neither Arsenal nor Liverpool have problems in this area.
Then, when you consider Liverpool could easily have had 4 players in the YPOTY, and Arsenal lag not far behind, both teams could remain fairly static and yet still see little to no downturn.
And they won't remain static. United are left with a big challenge - they both have continuing aging in certain areas whilst the top 4 teams improve. Whilst Moyes may have been to blame for some of the players failings, the problem with elderly players - i.e. RVP and Carrick - is you can't really undo the damage that has been done.
So it's not just the issue that United have to recover, 10-15 points on Arsenal or Liverpool. It's really more like 20 points, since United will pretty much be down 3-5 whilst Arsenal and Liverpool will be up that amount, simply through natural aging. Everton and Spurs face a similar challenge, of course, without the negative points but also lacking the immense transfer resources that could make up such a difference.
No, in the context of being hands on or trusting others to do their job, it isn't. The point Rene was making was that Fergie allowed people to do their job and would sit back and oversee, Moyes was hands on and couldn't cope as the club is so big. Seems a fair assessment to me.I didn't say Moyes' approach was right.
I'm just saying comparing it to Ferguson's is stupid.
The only one of those that looks remotely like it has a chance of happening is Aguero.The only thing that doesn't take into account is a big player (Aguero, Suarez, Ozil, Hazard) leaving. You have to assume that the clubs in the top 4 are most likely going to invest wisely with the money they get should that happen though.
The new manager will need to progress our style of play. Fergie's last few years in charge saw us become a bit sterile in possession. Moyes then made what was a minor complaint into a colossal problem.
Doing things the right way. The United way.http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/apr/22/alex-ferguson-manchester-united-manager?
damn, that's disgraceful
as if man u wasn't shit enough
Whilst I agree that we have alot of work to do and that Arsenal/Liverpool are set up well to grow stronger...this type of points analysis is basically plucked out of nowhere :lol
You think it'll take 85 points to get into the top 4 next year?
Honestly don't see United making the top 4 next season whoever they get, but then again Liverpool are about to win the title after finishing 7th the year before, so what do I know.
This must be the first time in ages the top 4 in England all might win a trophy in the same year.
No, almost certainly the ~70 point line will remain the benchmark for top 4 next season. I suppose I did word it poorly. I mean, suppose United end up around 63 points this season. That would mean they need 7 extra points to be on a top 4 average. However, due to the decline of playing staff being significantly greater than accumulation, we can suppose that the squad will be several points weaker off automatically assuming there were no changes in transfers.
Meanwhile, for Arsenal, they will probably finish somewhere around 75 points. Due to a number of young prospects in their first team, plus a general lack of aging players, they would probably be several points better off next season assuming nothing changed.
Now, obviously we now things will change. However, what the analysis means is that Arsenal (and Liverpool) have a buffer against negative changes. United, meanwhile, must overcome a hurdle first to make gains. What this means is, for transfer windows United must not only have an above average success in their transfers, but they must also hope one of the top four clubs has a below average transfer window to be able to overhaul them. So a top 4 team needs to make several bad transfers whilst United have several good ones, odds of which are fairly long.
we have khedira we don't need him
True.
But that doesn't account for the current points total probably being below the quality of our squad. Now I guess that's up for debate but I reckon if we had the manager that any of the other top 4 clubs had...we would have a few more points.
Of course this depends on us getting a good manager in, but that should in itself, in theory...also see us do better.
There is no doubt though - without investment we will not climb the table.
The £100,000 a-week, five-year contract, on offer to Shaw is a vast amount for an 18-year-old, and far greater than Chelsea are willing to pay.
Podolski is a pure beast in front of goal.
Kun is too good. I hope he can stay healthy next year.
I can just about envisage us paying £30m for Shaw, but £35m for Carvahlo...no way.
I think we will get him for £25m in the end, something like that. Even that is pretty risky. There are other players out there who can do that reinforcing job in the midfield who don't cost so much. Is Carvahlo really THAT good...dunno, and how can you really. It's Portugal. Shit league.
okay, was this really necessary?
Are they only beautiful?@Bacon, L1NETT, KidAlove, Carbo and Yurt
the lack of Padoin Kenobi is disturbing, but I'll make an exception for Khal Drogo.
I'll actually be really bummed if/when United get Shaw. City need a new LB pretty desperately. There are some good options elsewhere, but we really need some quality English players and that would have been a huge bonus.
Two F16s were scrambled today because Russian fighters were threatening to enter Dutch airspace. They buggered off eventually. The end is high.
Are they only beautiful?