No Shit they are revealing an IPhone 5 today? How unexpected
Marchisio looks high in it.
No Shit they are revealing an IPhone 5 today? How unexpected
Can someone surmise the interesting points about this?
#hillsborough in numbers:
96 died
59 may have survived
164 police officer statements amended
116 negative comments removed
23 years late
The paper reported at the time that some fans at the FA Cup semi-final, where 96 Liverpool fans were crushed to death, pickpocketed the dead and urinated on police.
Giroud looks like a default player in FIFA 13. Quite disappointing.
No Shit they are revealing an IPhone 5 today? How unexpected
Well, fair enough. I completely agree with your second comment and by referring to Hillsborough as an "ancient stadium" I was talking more about the general state of how fans across the country were treated at football matches. Looking back with today's standards in mind, it looks absolutely awful, but in its day, I don't suppose Hillsborough was abnormal at all. And as you said, it could easily have happened anywhere, anytime.
And I completely agree that the relevant government/regulatory officials are, in my mind at least, highly culpable along with the police.
And I suppose this isn't about the causes anymore, in that regard Hillsborough left a lasting legacy of bringing stands up to scratch to ensure that something like it never happened again, and the police have long been considered to be the main cause of the tragedy through their incompetence. The debate now is more surrounding the cover up. The most shocking thing today was the 164 significantly altered statements, but realistically, surely there is almost zero chance of any convictions brought against any individual police officers.
This just isn't true at all. Hillsborough hosted netural cup ties before (and since) 1989 because it was one of the best of a bad bunch of stadiums in the country at that time. The stadium coped with huge crowds before and after 1989, and since football was first played at Hillsborough in 1899 the day of the disaster is the only event where anyone has died at the ground watching football.
- The Hillsborough Independent Panel's report has been released today, concluding that the fans were in no way to blame for what happened at Hillsborough - it was the failure of the authorities.Can someone surmise the interesting points about this?
I've noticed some comments by supporters of a certain rival club that are, to say the least, unsympathetic to the disaster - labelling Liverpool fans (or those fans then) with some unkind words. Why? Is there something that happened between these sets of fans back then, or are these trolls?
I've noticed some comments by supporters of a certain rival club that are, to say the least, unsympathetic to the disaster - labelling Liverpool fans (or those fans then) with some unkind words. Why? Is there something that happened between these sets of fans back then, or are these trolls?
It isn't Chelsea is it. I have a sinking feeling that it might be.
It isn't Chelsea is it. I have a sinking feeling that it might be.
Every club has a vocal minority of idiots.I've noticed some comments by supporters of a certain rival club that are, to say the least, unsympathetic to the disaster - labelling Liverpool fans (or those fans then) with some unkind words. Why? Is there something that happened between these sets of fans back then, or are these trolls?
Didn't Chelsea fans boo the hillsborough minutes silence at the FA Cup final?
Some did. There's idiotic and disrespectful fans in every club.
No one answered my q's
compo is going to be a massive payout right to families based on pain and suffering?
surely?
They went as far as putting up those "always the victim" posters too.
Why are they fucking idiots? I don't get this world.
They went as far as putting up those "always the victim" posters too.
Why are they fucking idiots? I don't get this world.
No one answered my q's
compo is going to be a massive payout right to families based on pain and suffering?
surely?
Only downside: no females in sight.
From the BBC live coverage: 'The report states a similar "near disaster" event could have happen at Hillsborough in 1981, and subsequent ground modifications actually increased dangers. There were further problems in 1987 and 1988. Ultimately, the risks were known and tragedy was forseeable'.
edit: found this interesting link re: 1981 http://thehillsboroughdisasterdocumentary.com/2011/11/16/hillsborough-1981-disaster-narrowly-avoided/
Statute of limitation I would have thought. Not sure if it differs where government authorities are involved.
From the BBC live coverage: 'The report states a similar "near disaster" event could have happen at Hillsborough in 1981, and subsequent ground modifications actually increased dangers. There were further problems in 1987 and 1988. Ultimately, the risks were known and tragedy was forseeable'.
edit: found this interesting link re: 1981 http://thehillsboroughdisasterdocumentary.com/2011/11/16/hillsborough-1981-disaster-narrowly-avoided/
And again, Hillsborough was in no way on its own in this regard. "Near" crushes happened up and down the country.
Nothing I said is wrong with regards to the stadium itself. The ground was picked for numerous netural cup ties because it was the best of a bad bunch of stadiums at that time. Hillsborough has hosted netural cup ties since 1989, too. Only that day has resulted in a loss of life, which was the result of a toxic blend of circumstances. With that same blend of circumstances, the disaster could have occurred at any other ground in the country.
All pulling up previous instances at Hillsborough does is possibly show a lack of lessons learned in football policing policy in the 80's, but that was an issue of the times and an issue of the game rather than any specific ground, Hillsborough or otherwise.
I think they call it "tit-for-tat".I've noticed some comments by supporters of a certain rival club that are, to say the least, unsympathetic to the disaster - labelling Liverpool fans (or those fans then) with some unkind words. Why? Is there something that happened between these sets of fans back then, or are these trolls?
I've noticed some comments by supporters of a certain rival club that are, to say the least, unsympathetic to the disaster - labelling Liverpool fans (or those fans then) with some unkind words. Why? Is there something that happened between these sets of fans back then, or are these trolls?
Just morons.
You get it, sadly.
Some City fans taunt United over Munich with aeroplane gestures. The majority don't. But a few do and it gives the fans a bad name.
Some United fans spray up City pubs with stuff about Foe. One or two individuals giving the thousands a bad name.
I could go on.
The most notable one I know of is some Arsenal fans make hissing sounds at White Hart Lane.
That minority - scum of the earth.
I remember back to the 50th anniversary of the Munich air disaster and how well behaved every fan was. The silence was impeccably respected by both sets of fans.
The winner of the game was not important that day. The true winner was Manchester because rivalry was put aside and respect was shown.
Statute of Limitation wouldn't apply in a case which was heard under false pretences
THe case would begin anew
Was that the game we wore those lovely plain kits? I remember that.
All he said was 'Ancient stadium that was not fit for purpose and was inherently dangerous'. You disagreed, but I don't think what he said was false. That other stadiums were similar or worse is neither here nor there. It was a factor, and the result was removal of fences and mandatory seating. I don't think anyone is having a go at Hillsborough specifically.
Was that the game we wore those lovely plain kits? I remember that.
Some minority fans are just disgraceful but that's the way things are unfortunately. Just have to do your best to ignore it and not associate with it at all.
Best kit we've had in years.
Hhhhnnnggg that kit. I would even take that kit now just as it is with all the other shit plastered on it, crest, sponsors etc. Would be so awesome.