Maybe they should just have overpaid though. Or gotten Cuntreao, with a decent bid. Instead they dicked around being incompetent clown and ending up spending more on Fellatio than they had to, which they apparenlty didn't care much about.
Everton were quite adamant to keep Baines, overpaying for a LB that they though was worth £12 was never going to happen, and frankly even if they had, it would only be a short term solution since Man United to, infact, have to inject fresh blood and as I said, 29 is not a good number when you look on who to fork £23m+
At the time, Felli looked the better buy for them, dicking around it or not. He was 25, at his prime, experienced enough, have a lot of international experience, Strong, technical and loved by the manager. He also handed in his transfer request. So anyone who didn't/don't see the point is just deluded. He was the perfect coup.
Yes, Man U dicked aroudn, payed more, bla bla, but its was a good business for both clubs and one that actually made sense in aworld where we have Bale, Eto.o'o, 14 new Sunderland players amongs others
I think that is a fair price for the best player in the league in his position and such a huge part of Everton. As for the age argument, Van Persie was 29 when you signed him. At some point you just have to look past that if the quality is of a certain amount.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think the unwillingness to sell was partly due to insulting bids, if United had made a more reasonable offer then perhaps they might have came round. I would've gone very far to sign him as Baines is brilliant
23m+ for a left back is quite daft especially if you have at 29. Van Parsie is natural goal scorer and one that could win you leagues and titles, would a left back win you titles single handily?