Gonna try and break this post up jtb, but its a very good one, you make some great points.
You don't spend 300m on players and blame extraneous circumstances. You spend 300m on players in order to make sure you're never in a position where extraneous circumstances can derail your campaign to begin with.
But its football, you know? You can have a perfect squad, the best midfield in the world, arguably the best player there ever has been, and get fucking countered by a long Frank Lampard pass and a Ramires chip. It happens. There's circumstances that happen on a football pitch out of the control of board members and bank rollers. It's not an excuse per se
, but its just that when you're coming up against top top level opposition in the Champions League, I don't think money is as important as it is on a league level when the majority of teams are just overwhelmed by the talent you've been able to buy. Hence why Madrid and City have done well domestically all things considered, but maybe not at CL level. When they get to the stage they do, Madrid have come up against two teams that have spent nearly as much as them net spend in the last three years. Only Dortmund really have the excuse of not being in a financial position to match Madrid's spending.
I think the biggest problem is that Mourinho has built a one-dimensional team. The only thing they can do is counter-attack. They're not particularly physical, they're pretty terrible at defending (which is shocking, considering this is Mourinho we're talking about), they're not particularly aggressive (this is a team with Pepe and Ramos on it...). It's obvious that this team was built to beat Barcelona, but... it's come at the cost of being unable to do anything else. And when you consider Barceona destroyed themselves (and despite being utterly unable to beat Madrid, Barcelona are still going to win the league title) the whole one-dimensionality of the team was completely pointless. It's cost them.
Agree with you here for the most part, yeah. But I think Mourinho is the type to have a plan B during a match, and I think he did a good job today with the Kaka/Coentrao tactical switch. It just became too much for Dortmund, and apart from the obvious 'bring an attacker on', it really was quite clever how they went about it.
To go along with that, I really do think that Ferguson used Ronaldo far more effectively than Mourinho has.
Hard to argue considering how many goals he's scored, I think. I think Ferguson used the team around Ronaldo more effectively than Mourinho has, which is potentially down to lack of experience compared to SAF/Ronaldo being a better player now than he was at United and therefore dependancy and trust in him is multiplied?
There is no one better in the world than Mourinho, not in my eyes at least. But that doesn't change the fact that I think it's fair to say he's failed at Madrid. Unrealistic expectations? Sure. But he knew that when he took the job and he still failed to meet them.
With this, I just think that... I don't know. It's hard. The expectation was that he would win a Champions League. But its easier said than done, and I think in context there's justifiable reasons why he hasn't won it every year, especially last year and the year before. 2011 in particular was an even tie before the red card, and last year was an exit on penalties, not like Barca having absolutely no plan B against Chelsea.
This year has certainly been his worst, both in the CL and the league. But one relatively bad year on balance in three years? Pretty good to me considering the competition.