Wait, what? I missed this.
Locked thread check a page or two deep
Wait, what? I missed this.
Aww man, I really wanted another scandal to be revealed today
Wait, what? I missed this.
Locked thread check a page or two deep
Jonestown 2 Cyber boogaloo edition.I just checked the subreddit after a while and damn, the front page is just a giant mess.
These people are delusional.
Where does that come from?
Looking more and more like pandering, either that or he jumped the gun by a day.So what all has went down today? and what does the tick tick tick tweet mean? Is more happening today or is this all pandering?
Wait, what? I missed this.
So what all has went down today? and what does the tick tick tick tweet mean? Is more happening today or is this all pandering?
Jim Himes on CNN strongly alluded to the fact he saw evidence of collusion.
he hehehehehehe
It's also Zero Hedge.Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
A blog posting from Tyler Durden? Totally trustworthy!Just saw this:
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
Where'd you see it? The site, or the live feed?
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
you should make a new thread for this development
I don't see the contradiction.They ask him if the Attorney General or DOJ officials have ever asked him to stop an investigation. That's not what happened.
As long as he remains President, can't Trump simply pardon everyone (other than himself)?
wait, what happened?
Just saw this:
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
Its video of public testimony you can find elsewhere.PSY・S;237321165 said:where'd you find this though
It was posted in jest. Sorry for shitting up the thread, I'll edit.
Just saw this:
Comey admits under oath obstructions never happened (May 3rd)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...th-obstructions-investigations-never-happened
I mean.. its in the Video. Its under oath. Could this be Bad?
Its video of public testimony you can find elsewhere.
The source doesn't matter in this case.
Lol of courseGee, wonder where you found this ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6bxunz/dollar_jumps_after_video_emerges_of_comey/
As long as he remains President, can't Trump simply pardon everyone (other than himself)?
Pretty sure he can't.
Not sure if I can explain it... but one of the investigations is in either Virginia or NYC, and if he's charged with a crime there, Trump wouldn't be able to pardon him. It's only if he was charged federally.
Something like that... I'm sure someone can explain it better.
EDIT: I know this is from Mensch's blog, but I think it explains it:
https://patribotics.blog/2017/05/11...-means-president-hatch-rico-case-against-gop/
Some readers have expressed dismay that President Trump may use his powers of pardon to escape justice by pardoning his own confederates in their crimes. Several, separate sources with links to both the intelligence and justice communities note that any person or candidate who accepted laundered donations through banks with branches in Wall Street (even if they are from, say, Wisconsin) is liable to charges from New Yorks state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. Further, it is understood that the FBI and Federal Prosecutors are working on multiple sets of charges both carefully and individually. Were Mr. Trump to pardon General Flynn for violating the Logan Act, as one example, Flynn would have to accept he committed the crime and Trump would thereby admit his own guilt, leading to impeachment. Prosecutors might then bring separate, subsequent cases against Flynn for RICO, violations of FARA, lying to the FBI, lying on his SF-86, and so forth. At the same time, state courts, where Trump has no powers of pardon, would proceed against Flynn on money laundering crimes, and obstruction of justice charges against Trump might be laid out by Federal prosecutors before the Senate. Violation of the Logan Act is one charge against Flynn which applies to both Trump and Pence, and some lawyers read the power of Presidential pardon as not to apply to cases involving a Presidents own impeachment.
Gee, wonder where you found this ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6bxunz/dollar_jumps_after_video_emerges_of_comey/
lmaoGee, wonder where you found this ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6bxunz/dollar_jumps_after_video_emerges_of_comey/
Perhaps today is not a leak day. Today is a day to celebrate the other gifts given to us. Roger ailes, voat dying, the_donald literally imploding in on itself today. We have been given many many gifts
Trump can only issue pardons for federal charges.
They could also be facing state charges too, which Trump can't pardon.
This post from earlier in the day explained some of the possible scenarios
FlushedMy daily check-in.
Peepee tape status report, please.
My daily check-in.
Peepee tape status report, please.
My daily check-in.
Peepee tape status report, please.
The biggest thing the tape would do is provide legitimacy to the dossier since it's the most outlandish part of it.I don't even understand the clamoring for the pee tape. Right wingers, evangelicals included, would just wave it off with "Boys will be boys!" And if it included Obama hatred in some fashion, his approval rating with that group would probably get a bump.
What we really need is a tape of him admitting that he's ok with immigrants/gays/choice or any combination thereof.
But that, of course, does not exist.
Can they subpoena his tax records now?