yeah because you know that rule where you can't change parties and no independent party exists.
Umm, you're saying they aren't very well planned out but you have false information regarding the free public universities and social healthcare plan. social healthcare is NOT being payed for just by taxing the wealthy. there will be a small tax to everyone to cover it.
Obviously not. I know that everyone has to pay, but the way he proposed it right now most of the weight will be carried by the wealthy.
I don't think a single payer system can work properly for the US.
I don't think finance will work will individual taxes only. In order to realise many of Sanders plans the VAT system needs to be reformed in the US.
I think the system that might work best for the US is one thats very similar to germanys system. Multi payer system with the option to opt out of the government funded insurance. But the only reason germanys system works so well is because the government is involved in a huge way regulating insurance companies, in order to keep the government funded insurance and the privately funded insurances in line. People in germany complain that there is a two class health care system in germany but actually the services are incredibly comparable. I don't see the political will and expertise to do that in the US.
he has also spoken about education reform. not nearly enough though, i agree with you on that.
From what I gathered he wants to make college education possible for everybody. This is not a smart idea.
Right now the limiting factor for college education is money. It costs a lot, many people can't afford it. This is of course unfair. But you need a limiting factor.
So a highschool reform is necessary to limit acess to universities. Not everyone who graduated high school should be able to go to university.
The only reasonable alternative to mney beeing the limiting factor would be grades in highschool beeing the limiting factor. Going by european countries with free college education only about 30% of highschool graduates should be allowed to go to university.
But you also need opportunities for the other 70%. Government controlled apprenticeships for example.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business...o-much-better-at-training-its-workers/381550/
Sorry for always using germany as an example but I think germany is best suited for it since its 80mil people more colesly resemble the situation in the US than scandinavian countries with less population than some US cities. Of course other countries have better working system, but most of them aren't entirely realitic for a country of 320mil people.
In my opinion free college education can't work unless you drastically improve opportunities for people without college education, and going by all the countries where college education is free or almost free, thats actually the case.
Sanders is popular in europe. The reason he is popular here is because he proposes things europeans already have and enjoy. Unlike in the US there is nobody in europe attacking the general premise of free or affordable college education, universal healthcare etc. Once people experienced it they will love it.
But because Europe has experience with these policies we also know a lot more about what works and what doesn't work. If I look at Sanders plans they seem incredibly simplistic and higher taxes for the rich and corporations seems like his answer to all problems. But financing won't work just like that and many problems won't have anything to do with financing at all.
I consider myself a Sanders supporter, but I also fear that his policies will fail, not because the general idea is bad, but because the execution is bad. And this would just play into the hands of people who always claimed that this can't work anyway.
Maybe it would be better to give it another 4-8 years for a robust social democratic movement to form in the US that actually thinks these things through.