You mentioning these things is a problem because you don't know what the fuck you're talking about but spout some half-assed, half-informed, and I'm assuming half-baked rhetoric you got from someone else.
Do any Bernie Bros. actually know what free trade deals accomplish, other than "stealing American jobs"?
They plant the seed for globaization in countries oftentimes isolated from the rest of the world. The single strongest tool for the spread of democracy and human rights worldwide is the internet. Continuing to support an isolationist trade agenda to theoretically protect U.S. jobs (when that has dubious evidence to support it) at the expense of getting U.S. products that expand global awareness in these countries is borderline fucking immoral.
Do you know the single biggest concern foreign countries have when negotiating trade deals with the U.S. is? The impact opening up their markets to U.S. agriculture would have. World hunger is a problem right? The only way you combat it in many of the world's developing nations is through a free trade deal that introduces U.S. agriculture to their market.
How do you expect the next generation in these countries to be more progressive and globally aware if we won't open the pathways for exchange? The price for that is free trade deals.
For a group who love to fantasize about the post-industrial economy and basic income shouldn't the end result of free trade deals (rushing the U.S. to a post-industrial economy requiring some form of basic income) be the ideal, especially since it improves the economy of 3rd world nations?
But lets just keep that narrative going because the full ramifications and value of free trade deals are hard to understand and union bosses tell you they're bad, so they've got to be.
Trade Agreements need to address the following problems - because currently:
- Give little legal protections to people looking to unionize or individuals wronged by corporations
- Prioritize monetary capital that in-large benefits a few rather than actual wealth accumulating in the communities where that wealth is acquired and created
- Currently allows companies to sue governments for passing legislation aimed to better communities, work conditions, environmental condition and a host of other legislation that hurts corporate bottom lines.
- Legalized Slave Labor and ensures modern slavery continues until automation becomes cheaper.
- Expanded inhumane work conditions
- Spread the illegal child labor and human trafficking
- No legal oversight for corporations polluting the environment and actual governments getting sued when trying to enforce environmental policies
Personally from a humanitarian stand point I could never support any Trade Deal. To some people it's not just about jobs lost, job loss is a natural process and will continue to expand as a problem as more and more jobs will be eventually lost to automation.
Your definition of trade deals to me is frightening, because you seem to think your Trade deals are spreading democracy and human rights. Frankly the level absurdity in your argument is scary. There is no democracy or human rights in China - there is democracy and human rights where there is wealth and freedom to information. Where fear is not a daily occurrence and where wealth allows you to support your family while not working in inhumane working conditions.
Why do 3rd World countries have a population problem and are incapable of feeding their citizens. Lets see most were colonized and wealthy caucasians own all the main resources in some places, they privatized all their industry and sold it off the massive international commemorates that now write their laws or they have an oppressive regimes that accumulates all the wealth. Trade deals have done nothing to address these problems because they are not designed to. What they are designed to do is to accumulate more money for their share holders and owners. If we wanted to - we could solve World Hunger and a large portion of diseases that plague the 3rd World, we could pressure oppressive regimes to hold democratic elections with UN oversight, we could actually get corporations to have a higher standard that enables people across the World to live a better live and they would still accumulate a lot of money.
Most of the advances being made are not due to some Trade deals, it's simply because we as an organism are capable of spreading information across the World much faster than ever before. With the invent of all the technological expansions occurring right now - have you ever though that any kid growing up having access to a lot of this new technology and information they are able to discover democracy and human rights on their own. If the community this kid lives in isn't war torn, or under and oppressive regime, or being poisoned by some corporate conglomerate that gives no shit about any individual who doesn't effect the bottom line.
Really there are some posts on this forum that infuriate me but you are on another level