This is weird to me.
I can understand the idea of not liking the character, or even House Stark in general, but the idea that the Red Wedding is appropriate retribution because Robb fell in love and made a stupid decision just completely blows me away. We've seen other people in this series breaking their vows, and while it can be argued that those were lesser offenses, all of then should constitute death at the very least. Two oathbreakers were featured in this very episode.
Once again, I'm going to go back to Guest Right. If it turns out that something horrible happens to Walder Frey because of what he did, will that be unjustified because Robb broke his promise?
In the world in which he live
sd, and the position he held, he should have been prepared to sacrifice personal pleasures for his responsibilities. I don't think the severity of the punishment needs to be justified, just that there was one and it was created through circumstances he put
himself in.
...Though, when it comes to the severity, think how many people may be worse off under the Lannisters now, because of his impulsive actions with a girl. It wasn't just offending an old geezer that was his crime when he chose her to marry.
We've seen the Lannisters take arranged marriages on the chin, and we most recently saw Jamie disavowed because he refused to set selfish motivations aside and go to Casterly Rock. A big theme in this show is the sacrifice one has to make to achieve one's goals, whether that's setting your responsibilities aside to pursue love, morality aside to pursue revenge, or companionship and compassion aside to pursue power. I don't think Rob could have been allowed to carry on in the manner he did, having chosen to pursue love. That's just not how his world works.