Then we'll just need to legalize weed and I'm good for the time being.
you have to vote die Grünen to get that.
Then we'll just need to legalize weed and I'm good for the time being.
you have to vote die Grünen to get that.
Schulz will Bundestagsabstimmung noch diese Woche erzwingen
Die SPD will noch in dieser Woche über die Ehe für alle im Bundestag abstimmen lassen. Er hoffe, dass die Union mitziehen werde. Ansonsten würde die SPD einen solchen Gesetzentwurf auch allein einbringen.
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutsch...agsabstimmung-noch-diese-Woche-erzwingen.html
Schulz will Bundestagsabstimmung noch diese Woche erzwingen
Die SPD will noch in dieser Woche über die Ehe für alle im Bundestag abstimmen lassen. Er hoffe, dass die Union mitziehen werde. Ansonsten würde die SPD einen solchen Gesetzentwurf auch allein einbringen.
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutsch...agsabstimmung-noch-diese-Woche-erzwingen.html
If i understood that correctly it would be most benefecial for schulz if the cdu actively tried to block/prevent the vote. But what if they would go with it and vote for gay marriage? Wouldnt he lose another point that would differentiate him and his party from the conservatives?Schulz will Bundestagsabstimmung noch diese Woche erzwingen
Die SPD will noch in dieser Woche über die Ehe für alle im Bundestag abstimmen lassen. Er hoffe, dass die Union mitziehen werde. Ansonsten würde die SPD einen solchen Gesetzentwurf auch allein einbringen.
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutsch...agsabstimmung-noch-diese-Woche-erzwingen.html
Haha, he won't let Merkel and Lindner steal his "thunder" or what?
I agree, but just the escalating series of events was funny. Lindner: marriage for everyone will be compulsory if you want a coalition with us > next day Merkel: I am open for a marriage for all > next day Schulz: I am gonna force a parliamentary decision on it this week!
Credit goes to the greens I guess who have been advocates when no one cared
The SPD couldn't do much because they had to remain loyal to the coalition - and they couldn't vote for a proposal submitted by a non-governmental party.They weren't stealing anything to begin with. The CDU is the major reason why the vote hasn't happened yet, and even now they have to resort to a fractionless vote.
Seeing this as some sort of achievement of Merkel is just not true. It's way overdue.
Don't get me wrong, the SPD can't really talk either. They had many chances to push it through in their coalition and chose to fold everytime.
The SPD couldn't do much because they had to remain loyal to the coalition - and they couldn't vote for a proposal submitted by a non-governmental party.
Merkel just allowed it to go ahead and dissolved "Fraktionszwang".
SPD+Green+Left+ moderate CDU (even if all CSU politicians voted against it) have the numbers to get it through.
It's happening.
Very good. Is there a date for the vote already?
Ehe für alle went from 0 to 100 real quick. This is bigger than the actual election for quite a few people I know.
Would be amazing if it happened. Would be even better if it cost the Union a few points.
Edit: Just read that even Seehofer is in support of this vote. It will make it through with flying colours.
Anyway, I think this is big news and deserves a own thread. Should I make one?
Bavaria sure does breed some nutters. Maybe Bavarian independence wouldn't be such a bad idea.....
Lol, only yesterday he was saying that making it a coalition condition was wrong.
Also heard in the radio today that CDU leaders were against the vote, hence the need for no Fraktionszwang. CDU would never vote yes on this otherwise.
Bavaria sure does breed some nutters. Maybe Bavarian independence wouldn't be such a bad idea.....
Yeah, I love it here but fuck that.Oh god please no, then I'd have to leave. I don't want to live in a CSU Kingdome
Ehe für alle went from 0 to 100 real quick. This is bigger than the actual election for quite a few people I know.
Would be amazing if it happened. Would be even better if it cost the Union a few points.
Merkel knew the topic would come up in election and quickly changed her position so SPD can't attack her on it.
Classic Merkel move
They still can attack her party if the Bundestag holds the vote about it before summer break and elections and the Union votes against it.
On that note: Is the Fraktionszwang legal?
SPD can't attack her for shit now since they've waited themselves until Merkel gave a interview signaling she's ok with it.They still can attack her party if the Bundestag holds the vote about it before summer break and elections and the Union votes against it.
On that note: Is the Fraktionszwang legal?
SPD can't attack her for shit now since they've waited themselves until Merkel gave a interview signaling she's ok with it.
They even had it in the koalitionsvertrag and the SPD just kept quiet for 3 1/2 years.
Why wouldn't it be?
On that note: Is the Fraktionszwang legal?
Well yeah, like someone already said, the only ones who really deserve credit are Die Grünen.Merkel knew the topic would come up in election and quickly changed her position so SPD can't attack her on it.
Classic Merkel move
Damage control. She didnt intended thisI don't get what Merkel is doing right now. She's criticizing SPD for forcing the vote. Doesn't seem like a smart strategy to me on a topic that has such public support.
Damage control. She didnt intended this
Fixed this for you.Ehe für alle went from 95 to 100 real quick.
Seems like SPD is stabilizing at 23-25%
Not sure what you expected. SPDs social security topics dont get a lot of traction when most of the country is doing fairly well.So we're basically where we were back in 2013 just that the FDP and AfD are doing a little bit better. Kind of boring
So we're basically where we were back in 2013 just that the FDP and AfD are doing a little bit better. Kind of boring
Yep, it will pretty much stay the same (for all parties) until an actual problem hit: the baby-boomers retiring. And with Gröhe making the problem worse, we will certainly get in trouble.Not sure what you expected. SPDs social security topics dont get a lot of traction when most of the country is doing fairly well.
https://www.vice.com/de/article/59z...dersachsen-soll-gefaelschte-briefe-verbreiten
Looks like the AfD Niedersachsen faked the confirmation of the Landeswahlleiterin and is now getting serious trouble
And I think there is no way on earth that they are going to be able to join the Bundesttag when they are not allowed to be electable in Lower Saxony
http://www.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN19O1NSIn their campaign program for the German election, Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives have dropped the term "friend" in describing the relationship with the United States.
Four years ago, the joint program of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), referred to the United States as Germany's "most important friend" outside of Europe.
The 2013 program also described the "friendship" with Washington as a "cornerstone" of Germany's international relations and talked about strengthening transatlantic economic ties through the removal of trade barriers.
But the words "friend" and "friendship" are missing from the latest election program - entitled "For a Germany in which we live well and happily" - which Merkel and CSU leader Horst Seehofer presented on Monday ahead of a Sept. 24 election.
Instead, the United States is described as Germany's "most important partner" outside of Europe. CDU officials were not immediately available to comment on the change in wording.
https://www.vice.com/de/article/59z...dersachsen-soll-gefaelschte-briefe-verbreiten
Looks like the AfD Niedersachsen faked the confirmation of the Landeswahlleiterin and is now getting serious trouble
And I think there is no way on earth that they are going to be able to join the Bundesttag when they are not allowed to be electable in Lower Saxony
I doubt it.
Tauber: Political campaign: full employment better then justice (social justice in this context, the topic of the SPD), [link to conservative newspaper article]
Twitter user: Does this mean three minijobs for me?
Tauber: If you have learned something proper, you dont need three minijobs