• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

GI.biz: Router functions dropped from PS3

Chittagong

Gold Member
See complete article: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=10033


Router functions dropped from PS3 spec
Rob Fahey 12:12 11/07/2005
But Sony many have other plans for its bank of Gigabit Ethernet ports

The PlayStation 3 will no longer act as a home network router, according to Sony Computer Entertainment boss Ken Kutaragi, who has revealed that the functionality has been dropped because it would have been too expensive.

Speaking with Japanese publication Nikkei Electronics, Kutaragi said that the original specification for the PS3 would have allowed the system's three Gigabit Ethernet ports to be used as a home router.

However, this functionality has now been dropped since it would have made the console cost too much to manufacture, he admitted - and Sony now expects that users will continue to use their existing router hardware, which is becoming more commonplace in households with broadband internet connections.

popcorn.jpg
 
...and so it begins, the mad dash to cut costs to get the system to be not as much in the red while selling at $299.... First the router piece(though it looks like at least one gigabit will remain for the camera maybe).... next maybe a few usb ports.... don't be surprised if even the cheap ass multiple card reader drops off.
 
NoooOO.

I mean, no more feature cuts! Don't particularly care about the router loss, seeing as any home network nowadays should have one already.

But seriously, why the fuck would a router be expensive?

Isn't a router basically 2+ network cards and something that can intelligently route information flow (i.e. a CPU) .... why wouldn't the CELL be more than capable of handling stuff like that as a part of the OS function?

Does this mean they've actually taken out the dual network ports?!
 
Are they so short sighted that two months after announcing it they realize it will cost too much?? Something fishy going on here..
 
i still wonder who green-lit the idea of a 3-port gigabit hub for a game console in the first place. LOL @ the absurdity.

the only thing more absurd was people saying how useful they were. LOL.

cut the rest of the gargabe out of the PS3 now so pricing can be where it needs to be at launch.
 
Kaz noticed the 360 will be cheaper and his machine too expensive...
Features will be cut until the machine can be sold at 299? cool.
(well, depends on what they cut but so far they did cut things i care the less for: HD and Router function)
 
I'd cut redundant stuff in this order:

1. Ethernet HUB - gone!
2. Second HDMI output
3. 4 USB ports
4. 2 memory card slots
5. WIFI basestation
6. HDD - gone!
7. Blue-Ray
 
Wyzdom said:
Kaz noticed the 360 will be cheaper and his machine too expensive...
Features will be cut until the machine can be sold at 299? cool.
(well, depends on what they cut but so far they did cut things i care the less for: HD and Router function)

Well IMO the HD was never planned to be included at launch. I know that pisses off the MMORPG folks and the custom soundtrack people, but I just don't think Sony saw it as a a benefit vs. cost.

Chittagong said:
I'd cut redundant stuff in this order:

2. Second HDMI output
Yeah I personally think this is a lock to be gone.

3. 4 USB ports
Not all 4?

4. 2 memory card slots
Not gonna happen. Wait.. have we even SEEN memory card slots?

5. WIFI basestation
If you get rid of this and #3, how is the PSP going to communicate with the PS3?
 
The second HDMI slot was just a "look at our huge stats" feature from the start. Who in hell has two HDTV sets side-by-side in the same room? Future headline:

"Sony executives realize most people only watch one TV at a time."

DarienA said:
If you get rid of this and #3, how is the PSP going to communicate with the PS3?

nikuce4usb.jpg


I think the 4 USB slots will become 2. Cause, right.
 
JackFrost2012 said:
The second HDMI slot was just a "look at our huge stats" feature from the start. Who in hell has two HDTV sets side-by-side in the same room? Future headline:

"Sony executives realize most people only watch one TV at a time."

Yeah and i doubt there's a majority investing at least 2000$ of TVs.
 
DarienA said:
Not all 4?
Isn't there 6 of them? Anyway, 2 you won't need more than two, IMp.

Not gonna happen. Wait.. have we even SEEN memory card slots?

Meaning two out of MMC, SD and MS. I'd kick out MMC and MS, but then again, I bet Sony would go for MS after all.

If you get rid of this and #3, how is the PSP going to communicate with the PS3?
USB? :lol


EDIT:

Like I recalled, 6 x USB. I'd drop the four front ports. I mean, FOUR, ffs!

Gamespot said:
STORAGE
--HDD Detachable 2.5" HDD slot x 1
--I/O--USB Front x 4, Rear x 2 (USB2.0)
--Memory Stickstandard/Duo, PRO x 1
--SD standard/mini x 1
--CompactFlash(Type I, II) x 1
 
JackFrost2012 said:
The second HDMI slot was just a "look at our huge stats" feature from the start. Who in hell has two HDTV sets side-by-side in the same room? Future headline:

"Sony executives realize most people only watch one TV at a time."

.

Well you can use your PC TFT monitor as the 2nd screen, in fact I think some Sony guy mentioned thats what they had in mind.
 
This information is old. It was in a next generation feature with the June Nikkei Electronics. The feature states that Sony originally (as in during the early stages of the system's design) considered making the PS3 have router functionality. Kutaragi is then quoted as stating that this was dropped because costs were deemed too high.

The system was never intended to have router functionality when it was shown at E3. According to the article, Sony expects people to already have a home router, and they want people to use it with the PS3. The two additional ports on the back of the PS3 are still there but are to be used for other purposes.
 
JackFrost2012 said:
nikuce4usb.jpg


I think the 4 USB slots will become 2. Cause, right.
Ouch, I think that would be a blow... the PSP is Wifi, but the PS3 itself isn't? I don't see that one happening... Though if it did it wouldn't be the first device that was bluetooth equipped, but not wifi equipped.

Spider_Jerusalem said:
No, first they made the hard disk optional ;-)
Nyah I don't count that because I think that was always the plan.
 
Sony should re-examine their use of the Blue-Ray media format. That's the device/internal hardware that'll drive production costs through the roof.
 
anthony said:
Sony should re-examine their use of the Blue-Ray media format. That's the device/internal hardware that'll drive production costs through the roof.

The problem with this is that of anything on the PS3 the Blu-Ray functionality is the showpiece of the unit dropping it would be such a huge concession and blow to their "face" that I really just don't see that as a possibility.

EDIT:
chinch said:
add-on adapter makes most sense. the add-on allows for upgraded technology along the life of the PS3 too.

True, but If they go the add-on route then it's time for the "Sony is milking us" bitching to start again...
 
DarienA said:
Ouch, I think that would be a blow... the PSP is Wifi, but the PS3 itself isn't? I don't see that one happening... Though if it did it wouldn't be the first device that was bluetooth equipped, but not wifi equipped.
add-on adapter makes most sense. the add-on allows for upgraded technology along the life of the PS3 too.
 
AndriaSang said:
This information is old. It was in a next generation feature with the June Nikkei Electronics. The feature states that Sony originally (as in during the early stages of the system's design) considered making the PS3 have router functionality. Kutaragi is then quoted as stating that this was dropped because costs were deemed too high.

The system was never intended to have router functionality when it was shown at E3. According to the article, Sony expects people to already have a home router, and they want people to use it with the PS3. The two additional ports on the back of the PS3 are still there but are to be used for other purposes.


what other functionality needs you to have 3 ethernet sockets?

My PC only has one. Thats what your router is for. If you have three things to attach, you attach them to your router, and then one cable to your PS3. Whats so special about PS3 that it needs dedicated cables? Unless its using ethernet as replacements for USB - eg camera
 
chinch said:
i still wonder who green-lit the idea of a 3-port gigabit hub for a game console in the first place. LOL @ the absurdity.

the only thing more absurd was people saying how useful they were. LOL.

cut the rest of the gargabe out of the PS3 now so pricing can be where it needs to be at launch.

Well, a router isn't quite the same as a hub. ;) Don't you guys know your 7 levels of the OSI model?

I'm not quite sure why it was going to be a router in the first place. 95% of every DSL & Cable modem now has this funtionality anyway. It also doesn't seem to provide any cost savings really as the router part is really just software anyway. At least, I'm pretty sure they weren't going to have any specialized hardware in the PS3 for router functionality although such circuitry does exist.
 
I thought the second HDMI out was a freebie because it's part of the Nvidia Graphics Card output.

Also isn't it needed for 1280p? Or can 1 do it?
 
AndriaSang said:
This information is old. It was in a next generation feature with the June Nikkei Electronics. The feature states that Sony originally (as in during the early stages of the system's design) considered making the PS3 have router functionality. Kutaragi is then quoted as stating that this was dropped because costs were deemed too high.

The system was never intended to have router functionality when it was shown at E3. According to the article, Sony expects people to already have a home router, and they want people to use it with the PS3. The two additional ports on the back of the PS3 are still there but are to be used for other purposes.

Thread closed.

Yet I'm sure people will go on bitching for about 10 pages before figuring this out.
 
mrklaw said:
what other functionality needs you to have 3 ethernet sockets?

My PC only has one. Thats what your router is for. If you have three things to attach, you attach them to your router, and then one cable to your PS3. Whats so special about PS3 that it needs dedicated cables? Unless its using ethernet as replacements for USB - eg camera

1 Gbit port > IP HD camera
1 Ethernet port > to router connection
1 Ethernet port > to another PS3 connection
 
The Nikkei article states that Sony has the idea of people connecting using the two LAN ports to connect the PS3 to other home devices. Fort this reason, they have given it Switching Hub functionality. The single WAN port is meant to be hooked up to your ADSL router or Optical Network Unit (ONU). Also, according to the article, Sony expects people to keep their PS3 turned on all the time.

I don't know what any of this means, but that's what the article says.
 
Having a hub, router, level-three switch or whatever the flavor of the day was at E3 never made any sense to me. Totally unneeded. The same goes for the second HDMI port- complete overkill.
 
Pudding Tame said:
I thought the second HDMI out was a freebie because it's part of the Nvidia Graphics Card output.

Also isn't it needed for 1280p? Or can 1 do it?

The core functionality in the architecture level might be a freebie, but the ports are not. With a dollar for port and 100 million installed base, that's 100 million USD out of the window, something Sony could use in their bottomline. "But that spreads over many years" I hear someone think. Indeed, but when you start to add those functions on top of each other, you get into billion levels pretty quickly even in the mid-term.

Transformation 60!!
 
Pudding Tame said:
I thought the second HDMI out was a freebie because it's part of the Nvidia Graphics Card output.

Also isn't it needed for 1280p? Or can 1 do it?

1) You mean 1080p

2) There is some question regarding this. There is a certain argument going around that the PS3 prototype shown @ E3 was using HDMI type A ports, which might not be able to support 1080p. I haven't seen anything definative regarding HMDI type A not supporting 1080p, but there are a couple of sites out there that make this claim and since, we've essentially never had 1080p content before, and there are no sets that take 1080p input, it's kind of hard to know for sure.

In any case, I think it's pretty definitive that the PS3 will have 1080p output by virtue of Kaz making such a big deal about and also the fact that the PS3 will be a Blu-Ray player.
 
AndriaSang said:
The Nikkei article states that Sony has the idea of people connecting using the two LAN ports to connect the PS3 to other home devices. Fort this reason, they have given it Switching Hub functionality. The single WAN port is meant to be hooked up to your ADSL router or Optical Network Unit (ONU). Also, according to the article, Sony expects people to keep their PS3 turned on all the time.

I don't know what any of this means, but that's what the article says.

all a total waste. No doubt PS3 will wind up eventually with one TX1000 gigabit ethernet port which every cheap, new laptop has anyways. that is essentially "free" over one TX100 fast ethernet port. users will utilize any aftermarket router/switch they so desire (or already own).
 
AndriaSang said:
Also, according to the article, Sony expects people to keep their PS3 turned on all the time.

I don't know what any of this means, but that's what the article says.

Well Kaz has said in a few interviews that they vision a world where using your PSP's wifi connection you connect to a network wherever you are and then from there connect to your PS3 at home... to access content on the PS3... but functionality like that really seems like something that would need a HD to have any sort of real benefit.... and since the HD isn't a part of the launch unit.... well who knows if that functionality will just turn in to another one of those wishful thinking pieces.... unless by turned on the simply mean the PS3's main power switch is always on(similiar to how the PS2's rear main switch is to be left on, and you are really only suppose to use the front "standby" switch).
 
The news that the system was intended for use as a router or hub was first revealed at E3, when Sony's Phil Harrison told GamesIndustry.biz that "it can be a hub, rather than just being a terminal at the end of a network."

WTF are they talking about? Jeez. How misleading. PS3 was ment to work as a hub at E3. It is still ment to work like that. Nothing has changed. Period.
 
The article refers to the PlayStation progression as follows:

1. Playstation: normally stored away, brought out and connected only when used
(Game System)

2. PlayStation 2: kept close to your television always, turned on only when used
(Game System, DVD Player)

3. PlayStation 3: Power always kept on
(Game System, Blu-Ray disk player, Ethernet Swtiching Hub, Wireless LAN Access Point, Control center for your house's storage).
 
thorns said:
Are they so short sighted that two months after announcing it they realize it will cost too much?? Something fishy going on here..

Fishy? Come on, people. Some of us tried to tell you way back at E3 that they just announced every feature they could imagine including and that it was in no way realistic. This news isn't fishy, it is (or should have been) expected. Expect more to come.

Oh, and that's not really a bad thing. Too much garbage in the original PR.
 
Is it possible they scrapped the router functionality, not for cost reasons, but because considering that most home users have routers, if they intend to use broadband internet, the PS3 router would conflict with the router inbuilt into those modem/router/switch devices? If not conflict, then add an unecessary complication for the average user...

as for people picking on the second HDMI port...

leave it alone! :( I wanna hook up a computer monitor to it, and have a large sized HD panel as the primary display.
 
Seth C said:
Fishy? Come on, people. Some of us tried to tell you way back at E3 that they just announced every feature they could imagine including and that it was in no way realistic. This news isn't fishy, it is (or should have been) expected. Expect more to come.

Oh, and that's not really a bad thing. Too much garbage in the original PR.

Oh man, that's how wrong myths grow in the community. People not reading and erroneous informations.
 
sonycowboy said:
There is a certain argument going around that the PS3 prototype shown @ E3 was using HDMI type A ports
Considering they showed nothing but empty boxes at E3 that's a pretty funny argument.

TTP said:
PS3 was ment to work as a hub at E3. It is still ment to work like that. Nothing has changed. Period.
Hush you - you're not supposed to be trying to prevent 50 pages of arguments about not much at all :P
 
I can't understand why they said they would have that functionality in the first place.

Seemed like a total waste to me. All I need is one ethernet port - that's it. It doesn't even need to be gigabit either. My internet connection is only 4 gbit down anyway.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
I can't understand why they said they would have that functionality in the first place.

Seemed like a total waste to me. All I need is one ethernet port - that's it. It doesn't even need to be gigabit either. My internet connection is only 4 gbit down anyway.

Well a common point of debate is that the want the next gen eye toy to be capable of alot more, and in order to accomplish that they need the gigabit speeds... if they keep to that then we'll see at least 2 ports ethernet ports on the PS3.
 
bah, my main beef is Sony is starting to get a reputation for promising and not delivering. i shouldnt need to "expect system downgrades".

represent what you intend for the realistic final product to be. dont steal the show by unveiling a product we wont really be buying.

people on this forum talk as if this is the first of components to be dropped. hope this isnt true.
 
CaptainStrong said:
bah, my main beef is Sony is starting to get a reputation for promising and not delivering. i shouldnt need to "expect system downgrades".

represent what you intend for the realistic final product to be. dont steal the show by unveiling a product we wont really be buying.

people on this forum talk as if this is the first of components to be dropped. hope this isnt true.

Well, in pure technical terms, the PS2 was upgraded and the Xbox and GC were downgraded. (in terms of clock speeds). However, when you consider the PS2's promises of HDD, the CISCO/Real Networks/AOL partnerships, you could certainly make the argument that they had "system downgrades" in a holistic sense.
 
sonycowboy said:
Well, in pure technical terms, the PS2 was upgraded and the Xbox and GC were downgraded. (in terms of clock speeds). However, when you consider the PS2's promises of HDD, the CISCO/Real Networks/AOL partnerships, you could certainly make the argument that they had "system downgrades" in a holistic sense.

Wasn't their PSX downgraded as well?
 
It was a nice e3 strategy, showing all those ports to gamers, as if they would be utilizing each one at the same time for an exponential return in gaming ecstasy.
 
Top Bottom