MassiveNights
Banned
Professor Goodfeels is incredible.
Well I don't mind a bad review really. Whatever. Diverse opinions is a good thing! I find positive feedback loops really weird too.
Fallout 4 - Kills Montage
by Dan Ryckert
Jeff is in a great mood playing Fallout. Really fun Quick Look.
Given how much of a tinderbox gaf has been lately with meltdowns everywhere (I swear the end of year makes people lose their mind), all I know is the review thread will be a special place.
This Fallout QL is making the game seem much more fun than any of the other footage I've seen did.
What a year for video games!
it literally sold me a copy. well, that and the reviews that explicitly say that it's not broken on launch. It's kind of weird how poor so much of the previews and early copy streams represented the game. plus it's $48 on gmg with the voucher.
man, there is a lot of Fallout 4 threads on the gaming side right now.
The problem was that most of the pre release footage seemed to be leaked by people with early copies. Bethesda probably should've gotten ahead of that in a much bigger way than they did. On the other hand they might've calculated that it wouldn't affect sales much, so getting defensive about leaked footage might've not been worth it for them.
Maybe this is a little bit of a dumb comment, but it seems like GBeast kind of gets screwed on the games they're given to review or play for content. It seems like Bakalar needs to be on the podcast just so they even have some kind of perspective to talk about recent big games. Just seems weird that west coast is doing all the big recent games especcially when there was all that talk over the weekend about it being too busy to do Extra Life.
Edit, Not really too busy to do EL, but it being a bad weekend for it because they were so busy.
FO4 does look like a fun game. But since I like to do things in "order" I wont be touching it until I eventually get around to playing New Vegas, and I've got plenty in my backlog already so I couldn't even tell you when I'd play that.
I'm sure that's something they're aware of when they "assign" reviews and games to cover. It might just be that they take what interests them: Austin has always seemed to be more interested in indie games that do new, interesting (heh) things, while Alex covers some big games (Assassin's Creed) and some smaller games. Vinny isn't really "covering" games in the same way editors are.
I actually forgot about Assassins Creed entirely and that was just like last week, heh. I don't really expect them to be doing a bunch of reviews and stuff, but sometimes I'm just surprised they aren't just doing quick looks with some of them since someone on the west is doing the review, just so we get different perspectives or something. Just seems odd that everything see so West focused lately.
It's not really something I even care about that much but it seemed to jump out at me in the last Beastcast that they seem to rely on Bakalar a lot when it comes to a lot of the newer big games.
the compression on the youtube upload on this QL looks like shit
It could just be that the only get a single review copy, so while they can pass it around in the west coast office, they can't exactly loan it to the east coast.
How lazy are these duders?
No reviews for either Tomb Raider or Fallout?
Alex always had to review the bad games. It's for him to suffer and for us to enjoy.
How lazy are these duders?
No reviews for either Tomb Raider or Fallout?
The Fallout 4 review is probably coming later today. And here's your Giant Bomb* review of Tomb Raider.How lazy are these duders?
No reviews for either Tomb Raider or Fallout?
no Metal Gear Scanlon huh. I guess they cancelled that feature and are going back to Demo Derbies
I usually don't care for reviews. But I really like reading them for big releases. Was expecting a Fallout 4 review right as the embargo's lifted.
I usually don't care for reviews. But I really like reading them for big releases. Was expecting a Fallout 4 review right as the embargo's lifted.
I'm sure there will be a review, but Jeff doesn't post a review until he feels that it's ready and he's played enough to write a fully informed one, even if that means he posts it a little late.
I usually don't care for reviews. But I really like reading them for big releases. Was expecting a Fallout 4 review right as the embargo's lifted.
Embargoes are not deadlines. Giant Bomb is one of the few sites that seems to realize this. I always think it is beneficial for the writer to wait until they are happy publishing the content rather than running up against a publisher 's set date.
The problem is that the hits on a review go down the further they hit from the embargo date.
Giant Bomb is in a great position where I suspect they make most of their business on the premium memberships and podcast advertising, so page views are much less important to them than it is for other sites.
I think it was Jason from Kotaku who said that that was largely a myth, at least at Kotaku. Their data didn't show much difference whether the review was published when the embargo lifted or a few days after.
The problem is that the hits on a review go down the further they hit from the embargo date.
Giant Bomb is in a great position where I suspect they make most of their business on the premium memberships and podcast advertising, so page views are much less important to them than it is for other sites.
I think it was Jason from Kotaku who said that that was largely a myth, at least at Kotaku. Their data didn't show much difference whether the review was published when the embargo lifted or a few days after.
OMG, Jeff finished FO4. put that on the top ten list boys.
see, before I was hoping it wouldn't make the list so that it would piss people off, but now I think that it will piss people off when it does make the list, so GOOD
Yeah, I have to say that I was expecting that GAF would be negative about Fallout 4, but the level of negativity is amazing even me.
You'd think Bioware had made the game or something/s