Think we'll get a guest article from Patrick about something that happened in Mario Maker?
doubt that Kotaku would let him do that. But we'll see, he did have his GOTY list on GB.
Think we'll get a guest article from Patrick about something that happened in Mario Maker?
I mean...The first guest article is by Greg Kasavin. Wouldn't say he's new to GB.
pax south wrestling thing is live http://www.twitch.tv/pax2
DLeezy is casting, but no video so what's the point really
Eh, for me, no GB involvement makes this the equivalent of a house show without the stars.
Eh, for me, no GB involvement makes this the equivalent of a house show without the stars.
Yep. And for the bigger stuff, I've been disappointed at them trying to script it. Like, having predetermined results on a video game of a fake sport is like too many levels deep. If Alex is going to crush everyone, then let Alex crush everyone, none of this stupid interference stuff like last PAX Rumble.
Imagine if the audio fucked up a second time and they had to record again? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpUfImwI87s
This PAX wrestling thing is too much like wrestling. As in it's fun the first time when you're young and dumb but now you are less dumb and know how dumb wrestling is.
Boy howdy, we must have different definitions of what "good" constitutes.
I can't really blame them for fucking around while they have to fake-talk about things they already spent two hours discussing.
It'd actually be problem if Vinny wasn't so damn good at improv.
I'd hope they're not planning to use whatever small budget they have on people who are already salaried writers.
I also don't see why Patrick would write an article for Giant Bomb when he can just write it for Kotaku.
I suspect Austin wants to showcase less know writers. Greg isn't an unknowns but he does have an interesting take on something in the industry, so I can see why they approached him.
They are paying the going rate for freelance. Given figures I have heard such as $200-300 for reviewing a 70 hour RPG - a short article should just about pay for a happy meal. The small budget should stretch quite far.
i've heard 150 bandied around a lot (for reviews or articles that aren't quick news blasts) i've often wondered how this got justified when the fulltime staff salaries had to be vastly more than that per review or they just wouldn't be able to live.
i've heard 150 bandied around a lot (for reviews or articles that aren't quick news blasts) i've often wondered how this got justified when the fulltime staff salaries had to be vastly more than that per review or they just wouldn't be able to live.
I think it depends a lot based on your previous work. I've got a friend who's a fairly active freelancer who survives pretty well on probably less then 10 pieces a month
I am sure it does depend. On the person and what is being asked of them. That piece Greg wrote is really short. A pro freelancer could knock out a ton of those for every review they write - given they have to account for time to play the game as well.
How do they justify poor rates? Buyers market. I don't know how much Gamespot pays for their reviews but I bet there are a ton of takers at any price, if only because they get to put a big site on their CV and it helps them get a salary position. I bet GS saved a fortune firing all their writers. I don't recognise any of these freelance peeps they brought in, but I suspect the clicks remain the same, especially for their audience who just scans down to see the score anyway.
Yeah, moving to a lot of freelance reviews must save them a lot (even if it's a bit riskier). At least Peter Brown's in charge of reviews.I am sure it does depend. On the person and what is being asked of them. That piece Greg wrote is really short. A pro freelancer could knock out a ton of those for every review they write - given they have to account for time to play the game as well.
How do they justify poor rates? Buyers market. I don't know how much Gamespot pays for their reviews but I bet there are a ton of takers at any price, if only because they get to put a big site on their CV and it helps them get a salary position. I bet GS saved a fortune firing all their writers. I don't recognise any of these freelance peeps they brought in, but I suspect the clicks remain the same, especially for their audience who just scans down to see the score anyway.
Side note: Kevin van Ord did a review for GS again. But I think mostly for fun, he's still at his Trion job.
ok. I checked his twitter bio (but not the tweets) because the "about the author" says he's between projects. hopefully the next one comes around soon.His contract with Trion is over and they didn't renew. He's looking for work, which seems to be the life of a writer.
Late to the discussion, but just wanted to chime in and say this week's Beastcast was hilarious. Of course, I knew immediately when listening that Vinny's antics would certainly get a polarizing reaction, but I don't mind them going completely off the rails every once in a while.
Missed Backalar this week, hopefully he's on the next one!
descriptive marks shouldn't be granted (generally)
still, even having a trademark to those phrase in no way gives them exclusive license to a vague presentation format. that's asinine. it's like if i somehow trademarked the word "interview" and demanded that all late night shows pay me a fee for the right to interview people. it's total nonsense.
descriptive marks shouldn't be granted (generally)
still, even having a trademark to those phrase in no way gives them exclusive license to a vague presentation format. that's asinine. it's like if i somehow trademarked the word "interview" and demanded that all late night shows pay me a fee for the right to interview people. it's total nonsense.
Made it through about 15 minutes of the beast cast...was Vinny drunk? Bakalar is solely missed on that podcast as he's the closest thing they have to a straight man to keep the other guys from going off the rails one upping each other's jokes.