man imagine if there was a show on GB where they played old demos
Problem is that they would sell the 2.0 version with a full price as well.
It makes sense for corporate where they don't have to worry about keeping up with updates. Maybe not for the regular user. Or students who would look for the best value and/or pirate it.
Man, this Grimoire dev, lol.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1415655
So what you could do is, don't play my game.
Better yet, PM me your real email address and I will lock you out of the digital distribution system so you couldn't buy a copy even if you could come up with the cash, which is unlikely.
If you have the names of your friends or anybody even remotely like you, even people who live near you and may have distant kin relations in your family tree, send me all their email addresses and I will lock them out as well.
Grimoire is not junk and it's not mass market drivel. I don't want just anybody playing it. If I had my way I'd force anybody as part of credit card registration to take an online IQ exam. Anybody scoring less than 120+ would not be able to purchase the game for any reason, period. I'd send their money back. I cringe at the idea of ordinary dolts and Bell Curve average wreckers putting their greasy, stained hands on a keyboard covered with pro-wrestling stickers and playing my game. There's something about it unsettling. It's like if the Mona Lisa was opened to grade school children for scratch'n'sniff. It's horrible to think about.
This is another reason to never release it. I can't control who plays it. I certainly didn't work a decade and a half on the game so the unwashed masses could get hold of it. Wait a second, I'm going to plug the woodchipper back in.
As he later explained, it really isn't the same thing. A subscription to use software vs. a subscription for an entertainment media provider. How else could giant bomb sell content? Piecemeal? No thanks. But photoshop could easily just sell you their software for a one time charge. If they add features, they could just sell it as the 2.0 version.
Giant Bomb could sell stuff piece meal and then I would pay for it with tokens as they did things on camera for me and put on shows for the group when we hit a certain amount of coins for the night. I think they could all do this. And do private shows of splatoon 2.
Woooow. I saw this game pop up on the Steam new releases a few days ago and thought it looked cool, but assumed it was an old game just now making its way to Steam. I didn't notice the $40 price tag.
I want them to do that edutainment games feature they talked about on UPF. So many great and terrible games to choose from.
I read that URL as curio scat. I pictured a display cabinet for poop
you got off easy, then
Dont yuck his yum broyou got off easy, then
eat my assWait.
Why Alex specifically.
Has he ever even dabbed?TBF I think the time where he said "Eat my entire ass" I'm pretty sure he got it from Night in the Woods.
Alex is secretly the most millennial bomb duder.
Has he ever even dabbed?
He's dabbing right now
Dave Lang gets younger by the minute.Dabbing is for the Gen Z's.
So did we ever get an update on Abby's PUBG on a 2013 iMac saga?
This is the XCOM video?Dan dying in that first match was cathartic, especially with Alex not taking the bait whatsoever.
This is the XCOM video?
I will check it out when I can.Last week's Murder Island.
Very good video.
BTW the beastcast stance of "Science is Art" is super dumb. Like, what does that even mean.
Art is a representation of an expression.
There's no room for expression in science.
Do we know who's the first to play on XCOM tomorrow?
Abby
BTW the beastcast stance of "Science is Art" is super dumb. Like, what does that even mean.
Art is a representation of an expression.
There's no room for expression in science.
Chaotic Neutral
A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer). A chaotic neutral character may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it.
Chaotic neutral is the best alignment you can be because it represents true freedom from both society's restrictions and a do-gooder's zeal.
Chaotic neutral can be a dangerous alignment when it seeks to eliminate all authority, harmony, and order in society.
A lawful evil person would eat a damn hat already.I don't think the "lawful" end of the axis works super well for the GB people.
Funnily enough, Dan seems to be one of the bigger stickler for rules and pacts that entrap people into hell, making him more of a "lawful evil" type even though he's plenty chaotic.
2h to go until the second-best feature!
This Exquisite XCOM starter is pretty exquisite
also i fucking love xcom so this is dope