Yeah you misunderstood me. Whether it was your intention or not is up yours, not for me to say.
To be able to joke and poke fun is to form comradery and establish yourselves as peers.
Now if I could joke around a president and the president could joke around me, that president would be MY president, MY MAN.
Now if Rockstar sees some group of people as so pitiful and inferior to themselves they can't even joke about them... well that's quite telling about their values don't you think?
GTA built its name on toxic humor, without that it is toothless.This thread is the definition of toxic gaming culture. Day 1 for GTA 6
2016 to 2022 happened.GTA trash now
What ever happen to the rockstar attitude?
Yeah nothing personal, but I disagree with you.I understood your point exactly. You are - intentionally or not it doesn't matter - ignoring how we define "superior" when talking about someone punching down. And you're still doing it. In this quoted post. I has nothing to do with the puncher or punchee necessarily making value judgements. That is the entire problem with punching down: it is often done by mistake. GTA developers/writers, who are employed by a multi-national media company and supported by millions of fans who will support them, mocking one class of people, with little power, for nothing other than being a member of that class of people is a form of "punching down." Period. It doesn't mean that you can't make a joke about - even an offensive one - this group of individuals. It means maybe you should take a teeny-tiny minute or two and make sure the folks you are targeting for mockery could reliably do the same in return; you can not have "comradery" or "peership" in a power imbalance.
. . .or just keep with the strict literal and inflexible definitions you've been using up to this point. That works too.
I believe this is a predetermined character so the developer can put a deeper background story and more integrated connection with the world around him ( and her)Guys having the option to choose gender: *picks girl*
Guys having no option to choose gender (default male): ...
Guys having no option to choose gender (default female):
"OMG WOKE... ENOUGH WITH THE DIVERSITY!' - GAF
moving to? What's GTA Online if not a GaaS model?HEY EVERYONE, YOU CAN PLAY AS A FEMALE LEAD IN OUR NEW GTA and we are moving to a GaS model.
They left the company.GTA trash now
What ever happen to the rockstar attitude?
Cos it has female protagonist? Rockstar cant make a good female character?A game exclusively developed for the Resetera snowflakes.
I am not complaining about representation. Merely pointing out what has been leaked informs me that their product isn't for me so I won't be buying it go forward. I'm not even that big of a GTA fan to begin with. But if you take the satire out of the game it loses much of what made it entertaining to begin with.Are snowflakes those who complain about representation or the people who bitch about it?
moving to? What's GTA Online if not a GaaS model?
Same. Just make sure the game is fun and has great controls. That's all I care about with a game like GTA. A good story would be nice, but that's not as important to me as great immersion and gameplay.I don’t mind having female lead, just make her character interesting. Don’t do what Guerrilla did with Aloy when comes making “strong female lead” in my opinion she was dry as fuck.
That alien from American Dad?Make her as good as arthur and she can be a martian for what i care.
Yeah sometimes "kindness" translates to "treat an adult like a child".And I'm fine with a company being "kinder" but what I've learned over the years is "kind" isn't what you'd think it is. "Kind" means adhering to a certain ideology, not just generally treating people with more respect.
Aloy gets a bad rap. She tries to be the strong and independent type and the game shows the flaws of that mentality and she changes by the end.I don’t mind having female lead, just make her character interesting. Don’t do what Guerrilla did with Aloy when comes making “strong female lead” in my opinion she was dry as fuck.
Not when they say they're not gonna be offensive, no.Rockstar cant make a good female character?
I liked Sadie as well, it has nothing to do with that.Cos it has female protagonist? Rockstar cant make a good female character?
You forgot this character from red dead redemption 2?
And selling the city in parts..... WTF
As opposed to weak and dependent? What the fuck does this even mean?Will it be a 'strong, independent' female main character?
The "be kind" crowd I've found are very often the most vicious and mean.Yeah sometimes "kindness" translates to "treat an adult like a child".
Even though Grand Theft Auto games have never been my type of game, I'm sure this entry will more than please fans of the series. It doesn't hurt the game to make one of the playable characters a chick, especially if you get to choose between playing as either the Bonnie or Clyde character. And besides, women and all the other genders in the world can be ruthless criminals, same as men.
Its a good idea that they reeled back the size and instead will be releasing new islands and story missions more regularly throughout its lifespans.
Its sucks having a huge campaign then nothing for several years.
RDR2 was 50hrs long, i would prefer 25hrs at launch and then 15hr DLCs ever year.
Yeah but I doubt it's gonna go down like that. Why would they bother with the store mode when once they have Online up and ready they can just update that and have people eat up those shark cards?