Support NeoGAF

[Aces High]

I would believe the group who has actual verified empirical evidence to back up their claims. The Earth is a globe group has that. The Earth is warming up due to human activity group has that as well.

While Chat GPT isn't perfect, it sounds like the bias was not on its part in this case. You just didn't like the answer because of your own opinions about the topic. Don't complain about "I'm just trying to learn the truth" if you're performing backflips to manipulate the prompt into forcing that answer you want.

When you start an academic inquiry by looking for the answer you already believe in, that leads to bias. Instead, observe the evidence before you first, then draw a conclusion from that.

I understand what you're trying to say. Biases are human and I'm certainly not free of them.

To me, it just doesn't make sense logically with the information that I have. It's easy to say "dude, just suck it up". But that would be blind believing. I'd rather look like an idiot here with lack of understanding than blindly believing things without even trying to understand them.

 

[LegendOfKage]

Let's get back to Grok AI. This is leading nowhere.

Agreed.

I don’t have that option when I click the three dots. You’re sure it’s available for free members?

It's not when you click the three dots, it's right next to the three dots. It looks like a little square with a slash in it. And as I said before: "It has to be the tweet itself on the website, not an embed, and not any of the responses in the thread. Although you can click a response in a thread and then click the button for that tweet."

And it seems to help if the tweet has a fair amount of text it can use to recap or provide context. Some fairly short tweets don't seem to have the option. You can also access the AI itself here: https://x.com/i/grok

 

[FunkMiller]

When you start an academic inquiry by looking for the answer you already believe in, that leads to bias. Instead, observe the evidence before you first, then draw a conclusion from that.

Absolutely spot on, you clever rodent.

 

[FunkMiller]

Let's get back to Grok AI. This is leading nowhere.

It should lead to you looking at scientific evidence and believing it. If everyone did that, the world would be in much better shape.

 

[Rentahamster]

I understand what you're trying to say. Biases are human and I'm certainly not free of them.

AI also has bias since it was designed by humans and scrapes information provided by humans. It has even more bias when the prompts are generated by those same biased humans.

To me, it just doesn't make sense logically with the information that I have.

Perhaps you should seek out further information from primary sources instead of asking Chat GPT to tell you what you want to hear. FunkMiller has already kindly provided a couple of them.

It's easy to say "dude, just suck it up". But that would be blind believing.

That might be easy, but I don't believe in that approach which is why that's not what I'm telling you. I'm also not telling you to blindly believe in what Chat GPT, or Grok, or any other AI tells you either.

I'd rather look like an idiot here with lack of understanding than blindly believing things without even trying to understand them.

Your desire to find truth and understanding is commendable. If you're open to suggestion, I'd say that what you need to work on is a personal guideline to verify the credibility of sources of information that you consume.

 

[diffusionx]

 

[MrTroubleMaker]

still cant do hands/feet/eyes properly..

 

[Pegasus Actual]

 

[FunkMiller]

Zero chance Elon doesn't change a few things soon

 

[violence]

Nice. I didn't like the idea of giving chatgpt my phone number.

 

[Lord Panda]

Following is not Grok but from local Flux - just wanted to join in on the Trump and Kamala shipping

 

[EviLore]

 

[Aces High]

Will this cause copyright issues for Musk?

 

[Tams]

Yes, but "man-made climate change" isn't among them.

You are playing a semantics game, you just don't want to admit it.

Fundamentally, both you and Rentahamster beleive humans are affecting the global climate, as do I.

And yes, all these AI have guardrails.

Now, can we get back to discussing AI and how to get it to produce forbidden fruit?

 

[Aces High]

Fundamentally, both you and Rentahamster beleive humans are affecting the global climate, as do I.

Exactly.