"Here, have 10 million bucks and sell me that uranium mine."
"No problem, let me put you on my Pay to Play list on this random server."
"Sounds good!"
Are you taking notes on a god damn criminal conspiracy!
"Here, have 10 million bucks and sell me that uranium mine."
"No problem, let me put you on my Pay to Play list on this random server."
"Sounds good!"
Are you taking notes on a god damn criminal conspiracy!
emails
Yeah, something, something being careless about mails.Emails being the only thing lower case is the best thing.
Trust me it's all real.
You mean a 10 year old with enough cyberOr a 10 year old with enough computers
Yes, because the CLINTON FOUNDATION SERVER is going to have campaign information on it.
God, I hope you are just joking around.
God, I hope you are just joking around.
Hahaha, I mean seriously. Why would the New Hire Folder be in the same folder as Caucus information and information on Large Contributions?
Why aren't there any folders about the actual WORK the Clinton Foundation does? No folders on any of their initiatives? Hell, they didn't even think to include a folder for their annual meeting? Amateur hour.
The english on the post is horrible and I have no idea what these documents are showing or where they are from since its so bad
I don't know why you guys are dismissing the "pay to play"
The DNC explicitly used it
I mean I have no idea what's in there and doubt its anything, but that term is used
Those folder titles could be the FSB's grouping
I'm not. We know the Russians hacked the foundation and this guy is their persona for laundering the leaks.
I don't think these emails are going to show anything illegal or bad but I think we could be looking at legit documents with innocuous explanations.
Sweet Christmas.I did some hacking myself and looked inside the Pay to Play folder. You guys are gonna lose your shit.
And why would the campaign be using a server for the Clinton Foundation in the first place? Can they not afford a server for the campaign itself?
He pretty clearly says it's the Foundation.
My guess is this is cobbled together shit from other leaks (edit - and clearly publicly available info) that they are trying to pin on the Clinton Foundation. It doesn't really make any sense to me otherwise, and I don't think they waste that much time to fake everything they dump into this file.
Like this one image of the spreadsheet with donations and TARP funds; what the fuck would this even be implying? TARP is Bush administration shit.
@nickconfessore
Preview of new Guccifer dump doesn't seem revelatory --mostly political contribution data available publicly.
Reading through the rest.
@nickconfessore
Also, nothing I've seen yet in Guccifer files indicates they came from Clinton Foundation. Looks like outtakes from party hack.
@nickconfessore
I am looking for evidence other than Guccifer's say so that these docs are from the Clinton Fnd. So far zilch.
‏@nickconfessore
Hey @GUCCIFER_2, can you tell us which of your docs have a self-evident provenance from Clinton Foundation? Still looking but so far zilch.
Read it with foundation replaced with campaign. Literally the english has been bad on this dude and if he's running around with his alt-right trolls who retinly confuse the two some dude in ST. Petersburg might screw up
NYT reporter is unimpressed:
.@danmericaCNN
Clinton Foundation official says "none of the folders or files" from the @GUCCIFER_2 files "are from the Clinton Foundation"
@danmericaCNN
Clinton Foundation official says "none of the folders or files" from the @GUCCIFER_2 files "are from the Clinton Foundation"
Surprise surpriseAnd:
it's fucking nothing
And:
it's fucking nothing
NYT reporter is unimpressed:
This is exactly my point. I think the LOL Pay to play = fake posts are bad because the docs look legit.
We have an email with DNC staffers using pay to play. Its used in campaigns
Could still be from DNC I guess. Someone see if they know about the NX Febrauary Event RevealAnd:
it's fucking nothing
Even then, why would they have TARP info on there?
Exactly. None of the stuff he linked is anything the rest of us don't already have access too.
Source?
IDK but that data could help them better fundraise, know who to avoid when it comes to surrogates. TARP ain't popular with bernie folks.
I mean this is data sitting on a server, we have no idea what the purpose was.
One of the docs is titled "hfscmemberdonationsbyparty6101" this is just info on how much House Financial Services Committee members got from the banks (remember Hillary is trying to fight this perception and probably wants to distance herself from these people, epecially those that got a lot from the big banks)
This sounds like tasks I've been given. You want to know where politicians get their money and where they spend it.
Does the image cut off the "Benjamin Ghazi" folder?
I don't know why you guys are dismissing the "pay to play"
The DNC explicitly used it
I mean I have no idea what's in there and doubt its anything, but that term is used
Those folder titles could be the FSB's grouping
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-b...-laws-pose-big-challenges-for-some-candidatesPay-to-play rules generally prevent businesses from receiving government contracts (the play) if executives and employees have made campaign contributions to, or raised money for, certain candidates (the pay). Although a complicated patchwork of federal, state, and local pay-to-play laws, regulations, and policies exists, the Securities and Exchange Commissions pay-to-play rule is the most consequential. Under the rule, if an investment company executive makes just one political contribution to a covered candidate, the company could potentially lose out on lucrative contracts to manage the investments of public pension funds and university endowments. Candidates are typically considered covered if their current office or the office they seek has authority to directly or indirectly influence the award of the state or local investment contract.
Honestly, until they post something that can't be gotten by you or me I'm going with a hilarious fake.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/04/guccifer-2-0-claims-to-have-hacked-clinton-foundation/Update: A review of the newly released documents reveals no information about the Clinton Foundation. Instead, the documents appear to come mostly from the Democratic Party of Virginia. Other documents appear to come from the national Democratic party.
oh yeah this looks legit
weird they left off folders like "assassination targets" and "420"
I always put my illegal activities into named floders. Doesn't everyone have a drugs bought and hookers spreadsheet?
Can you please provide an alt-right source?https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/
http://arstechnica.com/security/201...p-research-has-a-russians-fingerprints-on-it/
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/gu...government-attempt-to-cover-up-their-own-hack
Also, for.laughs: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
Trump is the only entity not sure at this point.
I did some hacking myself and looked inside the Pay to Play folder. You guys are gonna lose your shit.