My God, Spartan OPS looks amazing.
I think Halo with aim down sights would be where I say, "ok, I think I'm out now"
But honestly, as long as it isn't slapped onto a preexisting weapon why not? Let it play the way the ADS crowds wants it to, and let the BR/DMR/etc still play nicely from the hip.
I wouldn't but only under a certain circumstance. I could see it for a Squad based shooter kind of akin to Rainbow Six. Maybe something based off the early years of the Spartans pre armor.
There a number of minor issues that are fixed in a Day One update. I will try to get a short, plain English list of these this week.
I wouldn't but only under a certain circumstance. I could see it for a Squad based shooter kind of akin to Rainbow Six. Maybe something based off the early years of the Spartans pre armor.
Definitely getting this day 1.
Used to play Halo 3 everyday, then stopped. Then got Reach..didn't really like it so I stopped. Kinda getting back into it now for H4.
I was wondering, whats GAF's general consensus on Halo Reach?
ADS doesn't work well with strafing. Also if ADS makes it in, but hipfire is untouched, reviewers will continue to cry about Halo's "archaic" formula. It's a slippery slope.
I see the fish stick control scheme as a decent enough compromise.
worst game in the series.Definitely getting this day 1.
Used to play Halo 3 everyday, then stopped. Then got Reach..didn't really like it so I stopped. Kinda getting back into it now for H4.
I was wondering, whats GAF's general consensus on Halo Reach?
worst game in the series.
The fact that 4/5 stars are converted to 80's isnt fair
worst game in the series.
I know a lot of reviews aren't in yet but Halo 4 is currently the lowest scoring full xbox Halo title on Metacritic with an average of 90.
Halo CE is 97.
Halo 2 is 95.
Halo 3 is 94.
Halo Reach is 91.
Halo 4 is 90.
That's hilarious to me which is why reviews are garbage to me in general. Halo2 better than 3? Its not even better than Reach. In which world was that SP or overall game the second best of the franchise? Our world? Wow.
Other than some good MP maps, id put that game straight in the fucking garbage. Its easily the worst one overall. Easily.
The weapons were unbalanced as hell with either the noob combos, the lock ons weapon that dont miss or the amazing dual wielding, oh and lets not forget the smg, brilliant. Then you have some of the worst SP gameplay of all the franchise. Linear, uninteresting, terrible ending. The only saving grace that game has are the MP maps. Thats its that's all. Oh ya, 95 indeed.
get ready nearly everything from reach is in halo 4 except Armour Lock..
Reach>3>1>ODST>2
Based on?
When has a negative rumor about Halo 4 not turned out to be true?Looks like there's no dynamic lighting on Forge maps during Saved Films playback.
https://forums.halowaypoint.com/yaf_postst127140_Dynamic-lighting-gone.aspx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzhtby7XJy0
Is this true, Stankles?
What else would you convert it to?
uhhh, what?
Halo Waypoint, ladies and gentlemen.
Definitely getting this day 1.
Used to play Halo 3 everyday, then stopped. Then got Reach..didn't really like it so I stopped. Kinda getting back into it now for H4.
I was wondering, whats GAF's general consensus on Halo Reach?
343 really hasn't had a good excuse for not showing skill ranks.
David Ellis said that not having skill ranks promotes teamwork, and both Frankie and David have said it also stops boosting.
People are going to boost no matter what you do. There will be people that boost their SR until they're a SR50 or whatever the highest number is.
And i'm not buying the whole not having visible skill ranks promotes teamwork. How? That doesn't even make sense.
It just seems to me like they just straight up didn't want to put it in. They wanted Halo 4 to be different, and i'm fine with that. That's cool. But I just really hope they patch it in later on down the road.
Based on?
Oh, that's fair enough. The campaign was enjoyable in Reach I guess.1>Reach>3>2
But they're all great.
wait, what?I'm talking about multiplayer of course.
The fact that 4/5 stars are converted to 80's isnt fair
?
20pt system.
What else would you convert it to?
uhhh, what?
Halo Waypoint, ladies and gentlemen.
The fact that 4/5 stars are converted to 80's isnt fair
Halo Waypoint, ladies and gentlemen.
multiplayer was best in the business. Campaign was worst in the business.
Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe = 100
Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts = 100
MW2 = 100
Punch-Out!! = 100
Kirby's Epic Yarn = 100
Syndicate = 100
Rhythm Heaven Fever = 100
Gaming journalism: saying that FPS games need ADS to get an 8/10
Gaming fanboys: saying that its not fair that a 4/5 = 80%
You seriously can't make up this shit.
Gaming journalism: saying that FPS games need ADS to get an 8/10
Gaming fanboys: saying that its not fair that a 4/5 = 80%
You seriously can't make up this shit.
Haha almost my thoughts exactly.Oh, that's fair enough. The campaign was enjoyable in Reach I guess.
wait, what?
Non issue, smallest map takes 15 minutes to sprint end to end.Just realized now how quick you respawn. Too quick?
stay classygofyourself.gif
they are full of it because they rated all the games, including halo 4, as exceptional? i think you should really step back and realize that metacritic's aggregation formula doesn't mean jack to anyone but the pr for companies that get their bonuses scaled.Giant Bomb gave Halo 4 a 4/5 stars
Metacritic converts that to an 80, up until that 7 it was the lowest review on the site
Im just saying, if they were grading it on a 100 point scale it might have been anywhere from 81-99, but its either an 80 or a 100.
but after looking at GB's other reviews, I honestly think they are full of it
Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe = 100
Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts = 100
MW2 = 100
Punch-Out!! = 100
Kirby's Epic Yarn = 100
Syndicate = 100
Rhythm Heaven Fever = 100
The fact that 4/5 stars are converted to 80's isnt fair
What nilla meant to say was that the 5 star system itself is complete garbage because obviously a game to receive 5/5 is considered "perfection" on that scale, so anything else would have to be at most a 4, which is an 80, which is a shitty system because obviously Halo 4 is better than an 80.
Those sites should've just given it a 5/5 because it's much closer to 100 than to 80.
-EDIT-
beaten by nilla himself :b
Seen the launch trailer, ongoing streams, or the gameplay videos 343 put out?
Kind of weird you have to stream the terminals off of waypoint... I assume this was a disc space issue? Since they are CG.
Halo CEA had great in game terminals, but also less content to fit on the disc...
Clarification?
I was wondering which of you nerds were gonna be the one to get upset about an 8/10 review
Looks like we got ourselves a winner. Step on down and receive your prize, Waypoint
-bleeped for the kiddies!-
Well, then how do you propose an aggregate score site that gives the average review score without having 4/5=80%?Im not fucking complaining Halo 4 got a 4 out of 5 stars
seriously, instead of being your typical fucking gaf personalities that feel cool posting witty fucking comments, use your god damn brains