Garrett 2U
Member
I doubt there will be a MLG playlist in Halo 4.Thanks for the responses guys, looks like people didn't really care for Reach all to much.
Will there be a MLG playlist on H4? Or probably after a couple months
I doubt there will be a MLG playlist in Halo 4.Thanks for the responses guys, looks like people didn't really care for Reach all to much.
Will there be a MLG playlist on H4? Or probably after a couple months
Protip: it's not worth wasting your time over.
Thanks for the responses guys, looks like people didn't really care for armor abilities all to much.
Will there be a MLG playlist on H4? Or probably after a couple months
a 5 star system isn't garbage because it gets converted into a 100 point system by a third party site. reviews are highly subjective so the lower the gradation the better, to get the general impression of how the reviewer feels. a 5 point scale makes every point count, whereas 10 point systems often degrade into 7-9 scales, and 100 point systems are just retarded unless you can specifically tell me what the difference is between a game that gets 8.7 or 8.8.C'mon guis.
What nilla meant to say was that the 5 star system itself is complete garbage because obviously a game to receive 5/5 is considered "perfection" on that scale, so anything else would have to be at most a 4, which is an 80, which is a shitty system because obviously Halo 4 is better than an 80.
Those sites should've just given it a 5/5 because it's much closer to 100 than to 80.
There's a perk in MW3 that makes ADS while strafing work extremely wellADS doesn't work well with strafing.
H2 had the most important thing, it was straight up fun (MP wise anyway). Also it was a time before Bungie didn't completely ruin objective gametypesOther than some good MP maps, id put that game straight in the fucking garbage. Its easily the worst one overall. Easily.
They weren't done in time for the disc to hit manufacturing.
There's a perk in MW3 that makes ADS while strafing work extremely well
H2 had the most important thing, it was straight up fun (MP wise anyway). Also it was a time before Bungie didn't completely ruin objective gametypes
I think peoples' reactions to your original post are dumb and knee jerk, but I could also see how they'd misunderstand what you meant. For someone who often writes out long, articulate posts, people sure do seem to shit on your ideas a lot. but lol waypoint, so who cares. Did you even come from Waypoint?Im not fucking complaining Halo 4 got a 4 out of 5 stars
seriously, instead of being your typical fucking gaf personalities that feel cool posting witty fucking comments, use your god damn brains
a 5 star system isn't garbage because it gets converted into a 100 point system by a third party site. reviews are highly subjective so the lower the gradation the better, to get the general impression of how the reviewer feels. a 5 point scale makes every point count, whereas 10 point systems often degrade into 7-9 scales, and 100 point systems are just retarded unless you can specifically tell me what the difference is between a game that gets 8.7 or 8.8.
so this is all pretty dumb and you should be ashamed of yourselves.
I think peoples' reactions to your original post are dumb and knee jerk, but I could also see how they'd misunderstand what you meant. For someone who often writes out long, articulate posts, people sure do seem to shit on your ideas a lot. but lol waypoint, so who cares. Did you even come from Waypoint?hate u forever if yes
Yeah, I agree it is a slippery scope, but I still say if it was just on one weapon to appease that crowd then it likely could work.
I wrote the review over at EGM you folks love so much, and saw the quotes from the 5/10 (which were largely spot-the-fuck-on, btw), and I'll be interested to see what folks think once 2012 has come to a close.
I loved the original Halo, and enjoyed ODST and Reach quite a bit, and even though this game looks fantastic and offers some solid MP options, I wasn't even remotely impressed with the bulk of the campaign.
We'll see what y'all think once you've actually played it, but if you're still whoopin' it up after the 8th or 9th hour of doing the same stuff, I'll be genuinely impressed.
ADS doesn't work well with strafing. Also if ADS makes it in, but hipfire is untouched, reviewers will continue to cry about Halo's "archaic" formula. It's a slippery slope.
I see the fish stick control scheme as a decent enough compromise.
Giant Bomb gave Halo 4 a 4/5 stars
Metacritic converts that to an 80, up until that 7 it was the lowest review on the site
Im just saying, if they were grading it on a 100 point scale it might have been anywhere from 81-99, but its either an 80 or a 100.
but after looking at GB's other reviews, I honestly have no idea how they figure this shit out between 4's and 5's
Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe = 100
Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts = 100
MW2 = 100
Punch-Out!! = 100
Kirby's Epic Yarn = 100
Syndicate = 100
Rhythm Heaven Fever = 100
gofyourself.gif
I think peoples' reactions to your original post are dumb and knee jerk, but I could also see how they'd misunderstand what you meant. For someone who often writes out long, articulate posts, people sure do seem to shit on your ideas a lot. but lol waypoint, so who cares. Did you even come from Waypoint?hate u forever if yes
Just wondering: are there Silver XBL members getting this game --and won't be going Gold anytime soon?
Well, then how do you propose an aggregate score site that gives the average review score without having 4/5=80%?
Protip: it's not worth wasting your time over.
Protip2: having a tantrum over people pointing out the flawed logic isn't "using your god damn brains"
Probably not. XBL trials seem only to be restricted to online gameplay and not any downloadables.If I remember right, you get a 14 day trial with the game. Not sure if that means you can get Spartan Ops or not though.
the retaliation is that it's less that a 5 point system is bad and more that you should disregard the aggregate trying to fit square pegs into round holes.Can people seriously not see how a 5 star system is terrible when trying to merge it with much higher systems? I mean like, even extend the 5 stars to use halves (or even quarter stars) and you already have a far more accurate standing. Suddnly that 4 star rating could actually be the upper end of 4 stars, rather than the exact highest point.
5/5 = 5/5 = 100%
4/5 = 4.75/5 = 95%
4/5 = 4.50/5 = 90%
4/5 = 4.25/5 = 85%
4/5 = 4/5 = 80%
Even working backwards, there is only one possible value for a full 5 star rating which is 100 exactly. 99.99% would be 4/5 stars.
I think the system is flawed in that regard which was all nilla was pointing out. Easy Gaf, easy. Less than 90 hours for me until halo 4.
:-OHey derp check your XBL messages. Sent you a double xp code.
the retaliation is that it's less that a 5 point system is bad and more that you should disregard the aggregate trying to fit square pegs into round holes.
i dunno hydra, why would you? sounds like a stupid thing to do.So why would you put a round peg into a square hole?
yes, i'm sayin' you shouldn't really care how metacritic converts scores because the whole thing is dumb. take the individual scales for what they are.Isn't the problem that the aggregate isn't being disregarded at all?
i dunno hydra, why would you? sounds like a stupid thing to do.
People are complaining because many of the points made in the negative reviews are really stupid.Isn't the metacritic like 90? Why are you guys bitching? Isn't that good?
maybe we can try it out in forge together.It sounds hot.
So why would you put a round peg into a square hole?
i dunno hydra, why would you? sounds like a stupid thing to do.
It sounds hot.
maybe we can try it out in forge together.
Low scores/mixed opinions are fine with me.
It's just really stupid when a reviewer says a game's formula needs to "get with the times" by adding in features that are totally cliched. If you have issues with the pacing/level design/etc, I don't understand how ADS fixes that in any way.
Now now, I don't want us to become what was for Uncharted 3. That shit was embarrassing.
In 3 they nerfed CTF, VIP sucked, and I think they even removed Objective altogether at one point. In Reach, people get more credits by playing it as a slayer game and ignoring the objective, plus all the terrible forge maps and AAs made it less fun (plus its matchmaking system is probably the most unbalanced). In 4, we'll see, but not liking what I've heard so farYa, great maps and horrible balance. Oh ya, just great. And ojective gametypes have been great until 343i decided to remove shit like Assault....
Low scores/mixed opinions are fine with me.
It's just really stupid when a reviewer says a game's formula needs to "get with the times" by adding in features that are totally cliched. If you have issues with the pacing/level design/etc, I don't understand how ADS fixes that in any way.
In 3 they nerfed CTF, VIP sucked, and I think they even removed Objective altogether at one point. In Reach, people get more credits by playing it as a slayer game and ignoring the objective, plus all the terrible forge maps and AAs made it less fun (plus its matchmaking system is probably the most unbalanced). In 4, we'll see, but not liking what I've heard so far
Low scores/mixed opinions are fine with me.
It's just really stupid when a reviewer says a game's formula needs to "get with the times" by adding in features that are totally cliched. If you have issues with the pacing/level design/etc, I don't understand how ADS fixes that in any way.
This soundtrack is off the fucking hook.
Other than the lack of Juggernaut and Assault, im happy. I think they should still allow dropping the flag but we'll see about that after i play.
Truth. I am in love with it. What has me even more excited is I don't even know the context behind the music. I am sure once I play the game I will appreciate the music even more.
Regicide is kind of like Juggernaut. Ya get an overshield I believe.
Kind of a shit compromise overall for both Jug fans and FFA players though. =/
Wow fuck everything that guy wants.