Zeouterlimits
Member
Hmm. Hmm.
Look at the weapons (fov issues)
Look at the weapons (fov issues)
Please be an altered image. Or split-screen. Please
They are all split-screen I think
please be fake
its Jem...These small issues are the things that make or break maps. Shooting through the plasma pistol wall on Asylum broke the map. Being able to hide behind the carbine ramp on one side only broke the map. These are the things that, at higher level play, piss people off. It's why Solace had to be forged to be usable for 2-sided objectives.
This is a terrible way to judge things. Gameplay should always outweigh prettiness. And personally, I thought the original looked great anyway.
holy shit, we get it. you like 343 and their decisions. you are like the Anti-Me.Define "a bunch".
I have a feeling it's a rather small number.
Also, adding a cliff is literally moving mountains.
I've never liked those sort of things because they remove your weapon.
this.Yeah, I'll get right to putting that in matchmaking ASAP.
And the reason I used the term "functionally symmetrical" was because many people, here and elsewhere, made it into a joke after 343 used it to describe many of H4's maps. Either make it symmetrical or design a good asymmetrical map. Functionally symmetrical maps are those where one teams base or side of the map has an issue/advantage/whatever that makes the map play asymmetrically. If that's the case, don't bother with the pretense.
Just because you weren't around until recently doesn't mean you can dismiss the months of backlash over miscommunication and lies surrounding H4 and HaloGAFs reactions at the time. Your stupid comment about moving mountains means you didn't actually have a counterpoint.
FoV is extremely restricted in the MCC images. Look at where the pistol is cut off on the bottom of the screen, for instance.Trying to figure out what you're attempting to point out, and I'm failing at it.
Bullshit.That's really unfair. This place is way too exclusionary and this is a great example of how.
Bullshit.
He claimed we exaggerated the statement that functionally symmetrical maps were complained about a bunch already. I pointed out that ignorance of the conversations doesn't negate their existence.
If I get into a discussion and make claims, I'll be damned sure I can back them up, here or elsewhere. Expecting the same of others is in no way unfair or exclusionary.
And is it just me, or is every new person greeted with like a dozen or so "Hi and Welcome!" posts? How are we excluding them?
Bullshit.
He claimed we exaggerated the statement that functionally symmetrical maps were complained about a bunch already. I pointed out that ignorance of the conversations doesn't negate their existence.
If I get into a discussion and make claims, I'll be damned sure I can back them up, here or elsewhere. Expecting the same of others is in no way unfair or exclusionary.
And is it just me, or is every new person greeted with like a dozen or so "Hi and Welcome!" posts? How are we excluding them?
Trying to figure out what you're attempting to point out, and I'm failing at it.
That's fair, I'd say.i'll take the blame for making this place unwelcoming.
FoV is extremely restricted in the MCC images. Look at where the pistol is cut off on the bottom of the screen, for instance.
This absolutely sucks if representative of the final game, though unfortunately it's not a surprise, CEA was the same way.
Is that MCC though? When they played the CE multiplayer on the IGN stream it had the CEA hud, not the original game's.
Top: MCC
Bottom: OG
Still better than Halo 3.Never playing xone CE splitscreen. That looks awful.
Of course it's MCC. CEA didn't include CE MP.Is that MCC though? When they played the CE multiplayer on the IGN stream it had the CEA hud, not the original game's.
RIP Halo 5 FOV
Halo devs will never care about you.
Of course it's MCC. CEA didn't include CE MP.
Any guesses on what IGN First will show on their last day of MCC coverage tomorrow?
RIP Halo 5 FOV
Halo devs will never care about you.
Top: MCC
Bottom: OG
Much better comparison picture. I feel like this is splitscreen, but I'm also a fair bit worried as well. Hope for the best, expect the worse.
At least in the 360 version, Halo 3's 2-player split is actually pretty comfy; it's slightly wider and a lot taller than the CEA/MCC 2-player split.Still better than Halo 3.
Hard to say; it's going to be implementation-dependent at least. In most games that let you adjust it, the effect is negligible.how much does the FOV impact the graphical load?
What I'm saying is the hud is wrong, in the MCC they changed the hud in CE multiplayer to match CEA's hud and you can see that in the IGN stream.
Like OG CE, the HUD changes a bit when you go from fullscreen to splitscreen. I imagine that the same occurs in MCC CE.
At least in the 360 version, Halo 3's 2-player split is actually
...You're not seriously claiming that wide-FoV Halo 1 at 1080p60 should bring an XB1 to its knees though, are you?
Yeah, I'll get right to putting that in matchmaking ASAP.
And the reason I used the term "functionally symmetrical" was because many people, here and elsewhere, made it into a joke after 343 used it to describe many of H4's maps. Either make it symmetrical or design a good asymmetrical map. Functionally symmetrical maps are those where one teams base or side of the map has an issue/advantage/whatever that makes the map play asymmetrically. If that's the case, don't bother with the pretense.
Just because you weren't around until recently doesn't mean you can dismiss the months of backlash over miscommunication and lies surrounding H4 and HaloGAFs reactions at the time. Your stupid comment about moving mountains means you didn't actually have a counterpoint.
holy shit, we get it. you like 343 and their decisions. you are like the Anti-Me.
Bullshit.
He claimed we exaggerated the statement that functionally symmetrical maps were complained about a bunch already. I pointed out that ignorance of the conversations doesn't negate their existence.
If I get into a discussion and make claims, I'll be damned sure I can back them up, here or elsewhere. Expecting the same of others is in no way unfair or exclusionary.
And is it just me, or is every new person greeted with like a dozen or so "Hi and Welcome!" posts? How are we excluding them?
Ah yeah, the BTS would make sense. I don't think we're gonna get any H5 beta footage till HaloFest, though.I think they will just release the BTS documentary and we will probably get some more sneak peeks of Halo 5 beta footage in there.
You obviously haven't been a Halo fan for very long. You'll soon learn to hope for a happy accident, but expect it to be even worse than you imagined.
Never played CEA split screen, does it change the shape of the shield bar when you do?
I think they will just release the BTS documentary and we will probably get some more sneak peeks of Halo 5 beta footage in there.
Ah yeah, the BTS would make sense. I don't think we're gonna get any H5 beta footage till HaloFest, though.
All right, never mind then. That's super weird, why change the shape of the shield bar? There is still plenty of room for it and I doubt it took much in the way of resources.Yup.
I'm not surprised, but if I was someone who expected 343i to do things like make good design choices or learn from their mistakes, I would be.Okay, now that I understand the context: why are we surprised by this?
This was outside of the norm for the series, though. Including for OG CE.As pointed out, CEA had a narrower FOV in splitscreen.
Perspective projection won't work, so what do you suggest? Equirectangular?CE should be running at a FoV of at least 360 tbh
Don't mind him, he hates all CE fans despite wearing that avatar and probably thinks we all post with heavy fingers.no it was more of a general question targeted to the general modern games being in development, eg Destiny and its super tiny FOV
Yup.
Ah, didn't know that.Like I said before, the doc is premiering on Xbox One and Xbox 360, not IGN. If the final First piece of content is the doc then that means they will release a piece of content after it was already released on Xbox(assuming it goes up when the marketplace updates).
Uhhh, I didn't see anything there except for a black orb? Edit : Oh wait, it's just really dark. I thought it was some type of stand or something.So Greenskull found the Halo toy on the H2A Gravemind mission.
I thought it would be more than just a plushie, but that's still okay. Collectibles in Halo are cool.
So Greenskull found the Halo toy on the H2A Gravemind mission.
I thought it would be more than just a plushie, but that's still okay. Collectibles in Halo are cool.
Within one week of posting in HaloGAF I received a few PMs from older members apologizing for how shitty people were treating the new crop of juniors. So yeah, HaloGAF has always been a bit shit towards newbies.
Don't post like an asshole or spam like a certain alt who has returned (or shill for a system) and you'll eventually fit in.
Pretty sure I had posts quoted multiple times with the simple response "who the fuck are you?" as the only reply.
PMs again eh? Truly full circle.Within one week of posting in HaloGAF I received a few PMs from older members apologizing for how shitty people were treating the new crop of juniors. So yeah, HaloGAF has always been a bit shit towards newbies.
Don't post like an asshole or spam like a certain alt who has returned (or shill for a system) and you'll eventually fit in.
Pretty sure I had posts quoted multiple times with the simple response "who the fuck are you?" as the only reply.