More loots:
Um, you would do what you would normally do when getting shot by a DMR. Strafing, and outshooting him if you're a better player.
More layers are not better. Not only that, it's not adding skill, it's getting in the way of your skill at shooting and aiming by taking your ability to do so effectively away.Why is it bullshit? That's the layer of meta to the battle so it's not simply pinging at people at long ranges because you have aim-assist.
No it would not be worse with no descope, because with de-scope you have to find the person, zoom in, and shoot back, but you can't do that between DMR shots.I'm not sure what this means. You are arguing that, with the ability to be hit out of scope, it is impossible to win a long range battle when you get shot first. Taking what you said and your perceived ease of use of the DMR, I'm saying that it wouldn't matter, un-scoping or not. In fact, with no de-scope mechanism it would be worse.
Does this mean you're agreeing with me here? Confused 0_o
Is there a thread where the E3 awards are being discussed? Such a thread might be relevant to my interests.
Since HaloGaf believes Reach is bad, shouldn't you want a lower BPR to show you don't play bad games?
mnightshamylan.jpg
More layers are not better. Not only that, it's not adding skill, it's getting in the way of your skill at shooting and aiming by taking your ability to do so effectively away.
No you can't, because you have to go through this extraneous mechanic first.Which you can do with descoping in, so how is descoping the issue as opposed to a lack of judgement in positioning/awareness/etc?
He won that battle because he was able to de-scope the opposing player and get back into it. If you could not do that, the guy would have still been scoped in and killed him.Congratulations, you can do it.
It's stupid that you have to deal with an extraneous layer of bullshit in order to do so.
More layers are not better. Not only that, it's not adding skill, it's getting in the way of your skill at shooting and aiming by taking your ability to do so effectively away.
No it would not be worse with no descope, because with de-scope you have to find the person, zoom in, and shoot back, but you can't do that between DMR shots.
Because being at range suddenly means you can't just strafe and outshoot, right?He won that battle because he was able to de-scope the opposing player and get back into it. If you could not do that, the guy would have still been scoped in and killed him.
He won that battle because he was able to de-scope the opposing player and get back into it. If you could not do that, the guy would have still been scoped in and killed him.
No you can't, because you have to go through this extraneous mechanic first.
I dunno, I can create one if you'd like.
Well I don't care if you have or not. You shouldn't have to.Once again, I have.
edit: my bpr is only like a 70, haha
My BPR's 86 or something like that.
I betray a lot.
My BRP is like 36. And I try my best.
My BPR is 72
BPR is 74. Better than I thought!
Also, K/D is 1.29. That's pretty much my average thoughout all Halo games.
BPR 80. It used to be a bit higher higher, then i started playing with HaloGAF, had to play MLG and my KD dropped a notch.
BPR 57. :/
And I got all excited the other day when my K/D went fro 1.11 to 1.12.
Mine is 50.
BPR 57. :/
edit: my bpr is only like a 70, haha
My BPR's 86 or something like that.
I betray a lot.
My BRP is like 36. And I try my best.
My BPR is 72
Mine is 50.
, but threads with Halo in them tend to get, um, interesting quickly.
My god HaloGAF is embarassing.
Remember the time you guys lost to Bungie?
Oddly, i think the couple of Halo 4 threads existing due to E3 haven't had as stupid people as gaming Halo threads normally have.
Guess Halo 4 impressed people, even those who don't particularly care about Halo?
Well I don't care if you have or not. You shouldn't have to.
The DMR wasn't in the game before Reach.What? Quick scoping between shots has been apart of Halo for years.
No such thread has been made, well ok there has been an outrage thread about the awards.Is there a thread where the E3 awards are being discussed? Such a thread might be relevant to my interests.
yes you canNo it would not be worse with no descope, because with de-scope you have to find the person, zoom in, and shoot back, but you can't do that between DMR shots.
Is there any reason as to why it doesn't add skill other than you not liking it? Coping with the way the scoping works is nearly the entirety of long range fights.More layers are not better. Not only that, it's not adding skill, it's getting in the way of your skill at shooting and aiming by taking your ability to do so effectively away.
The DMR wasn't in the game before Reach.
No, I'm saying you shouldn't have to constantly hammer the stick and just be able to stay in scope and outshoot them.So you're saying we should have to try to fight back a guy long range without zooming in? I'm just trying to understand what exactly your argument is
I think I'm done with this pointless argument. We're all arguing against one person who clearly will never change his view on the matter. If it turns out in game that the de-scoping mechanic has changed from getting shot once to getting shot twice, so be it. I'll adapt, it's not like I can sway 343i's opinion. This game is heading in a more casual direction; perhaps it's for the best.No it would not be worse with no descope, because with de-scope you have to find the person, zoom in, and shoot back, but you can't do that between DMR shots.
So you're saying we should have to try to fight back a guy long range without zooming in? I'm just trying to understand what exactly your argument is
No, I'm saying you shouldn't have to constantly hammer the stick and just be able to stay in scope and outshoot them.
The BR doesn't have enough range to make this a problem. If you had to use the scope on the BR, you weren't going to hit much anyway, and you could effectively hit at that range without scope. With the DMR, you can't effectively shoot without scope at ranges that the scope allows people to shoot you at.I'm talking BR as well, obviously.
Question: if that's the case, what will it matter if there's de-scoping or not? If you can't un-scope him and he won't miss a shot, you die 100% of the time if he hits you first. I think I'd rather try to de-scope him and retreat.
The BR doesn't have enough range to make this a problem. If you had to use the scope on the BR, you weren't going to hit much anyway, and you could effectively hit at that range without scope. With the DMR, you can't effectively shoot without scope at ranges that the scope allows people to shoot you at.
So you want it to be easier?
The range on the BR wasn't even close to that of the DMR. If you were getting shot by a BR, you didn't have to scope in to shoot back because you couldn't cross map with the BR like you can with the DMR. The fucking DMR is a mini sniper rifle with the added bonus of not having the same accuracy at range out of scope as in scope due to magnetism. You HAVE to scope in to shoot at range.So scope was useless on the BR? lol ok bro