notsureifserious.I think the Halo 3 campaign is the most boring of the lot, bar the Legendary Ending.
notsureifserious.I think the Halo 3 campaign is the most boring of the lot, bar the Legendary Ending.
Halo 3 DLC implementation was fucking terrible. Locked out of most playlists if you don't buy these crappy maps. Yeah, I sure want to spend 10 bucks on Sandtrap 2.0 Forge version to get to play BTB again. Having to spend nearly $100 to get access to all the playlists? Terrible. Not again.
I don't know what's the solution other than a games/server list. Apparently that's way too above people's heads. Way too complicated even though these same people can operate computers and smartphones and other technologies. Oh games/server list... That's like fucking rocket science to some.
You aren't going to get a ton of money doing that with a multiplayer game.Fable 2's implementation.
Release a "free" version of the DLC that doesn't let you get achievements or whatever bonuses.
Paid version lets you unlock achievements and whatever new armor or whatever the fuck.
This way paid users get to play the content they paid for and the playerbase isn't split down the middle.
Maybe the tournament should split in that regard.I still think people from different continents shouldn't have been placed together. Scheduling nightmare...
notsureifserious.
Maybe the tournament should split in that regard.
Halo 3 DLC implementation was fucking terrible. Locked out of most playlists if you don't buy these crappy maps. Yeah, I sure want to spend 10 bucks on Sandtrap 2.0 Forge version to get to play BTB again. Having to spend nearly $100 to get access to all the playlists? Terrible. Not again.
.
You aren't going to get a ton of money doing that with a multiplayer game.
Avatar terrorist.Maybe the tournament should split in that regard.
Oh, I agree completely.Well, Halo 2's was the best, but you're never going to see that again. I honestly had no problem being the big Halo fan and subsidizing the DLC for an exclusive period then the DLC being deployed for free + required afterwards.
Playing swordbase 7 out of 10 times should be a blessing. Maybe I'll dust off the 360 this weekend just for that. Good memories of Swordbase.
Its easy. You/fracas say have the games played by xx/xx/xxxx and post the bracket. Then let's say Karl v. Wu is one of the matchups. Then we message each other with possible times. If there's no good times then you guys can either rematch the bracket or throw in alternates.
The way it's set up right now makes you a largely redundant step.
Okay, that works for me. Thanks for laying it out, Risen. I might PM you for more advice later down the line, hah.I've run or helped run a few tournaments... From FFA to BTB. In our current style, those running the tourny could provide a date each week for a round to be played. Give the team captains 7 days to get together. If a someone can't make it during that seven days, their team plays a man down or forfeits. Usually tournys in this style would allow teams of 5 or 6 to have alternates for scheduling conflicts. But they work fine without.
Edit: Posted the above from my phone so was brief, but back at computer:
So - post the bracket. Set one round per week. Official game time is Sunday, but the teams have 7 days to play their round (so through Saturday night at the end of the week). Make it the responsibility of the captains to get their teams together. This way there are only two people talking and deciding on the time, who are only in touch with their respective teams. If a team can't play with full roster because someone can't make the time, they play short or forfeit. Allow gentleman's agreements to play 3v3 if needed.
It works, and takes pressure off those running it.
Running in heels nooooooooo
:lol :lolSophie Ellis Daxtor
I was looking at old picture and I found this....
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff514/k2overheat/4806599c.jpg[IMG]
First damn did I look fat before joining the army, second I miss E3:([/QUOTE]
?
You don't look fat at all in that photo. #jealous
I still think people from different continents shouldn't have been placed together. Scheduling nightmare...
DLC should be required in majority of the playlists. If you're still playing a games MP a year or two after release, ten bucks for maps is nothing. I paid for all of these maps and they rarely show up in what I like to play.
Well, Halo 2's was the best, but you're never going to see that again. I honestly had no problem being the big Halo fan and subsidizing the DLC for an exclusive period then the DLC being deployed for free + required afterwards.
I like it, but I doubt the extras would be so plentiful.Thoughts? I have no idea if this is financially viable as a business model, if the exclusivity period would need to be adjusted, etc. Just spitballing ideas.
You wanna settle down?Kimbra > Sophie Ellis Daxtor
Oh, I agree completely.
Hey when are we practicing?
Practice is for the weak.
Practice is for the weak.
Tonight maybe. I'll hop on for a few hours around 10CST.Hey when are we practicing?
I like it, but I doubt the extras would be so plentiful.
Do CoD or BF map packs go free? Because I have to wonder if it's an Accountant and some upper management going - "Well they don't, and are still hugely successful, we just need to be better about selling them, not making them go free after 3 months".
In the interests of the playerbase, this is what should happen, but I don't believe it will. 3 months might be too soon, I'd push it to 4/5.
Well I never played with these guys before need to know who is a good sniper, who has a good dmr, who is aggressive, who is passive, and what role we should play.
I'd love to play with you.BTW, if you, Overheat and Wu would want to play together, I won't be able to do so until Sunday.
We are in complete agreement about the (sad) situation.I think map packs continue bringing in enough money long after release that Microsoft is happy to keep charging for them. It's not best for players, in terms of splitting the population, but as long as the playerbase is healthy enough to keep population and thus DLC revenue up they don't have much motivation to give things away for free.
I was just wishfully thinking of a combination between the previous DLC model and Team Fortress 2's method of bringing back inactive players with free maps and gametypes while raking in a fortune on hats. (I guess some of that free TF2 content is community-created so the analogy isn't perfect.)
Well, he is aI made something for heckfu.
Well I never played with these guys before need to know who is a good sniper, who has a good dmr, who is aggressive, who is passive, and what role we should play.
Tonight maybe. I'll hop on for a few hours around 10CST.
No one is good with the sniper, none have a good dmr, all are aggressive, and you play the right role at the right time during the game.
Finished.
I'd love to play with you.
aww man I am not sure about tonight. I will be out drinking tonight. Not sure when i will be back. However, If I come home early and you're on I will play, drunk and all.
We'll actually, I may be online around 2 AM my time tonight, so that would be 8 PM EST. However, I can not guarantee I won't be drunk.
I like it, but I doubt the extras would be so plentiful.
Do CoD or BF map packs go free? Because I have to wonder if it's an Accountant and some upper management going - "Well they don't, and are still hugely successful, we just need to be better about selling them, not making them go free after 3 months".
In the interests of the playerbase, this is what should happen, but I don't believe it will. 3 months might be too soon, I'd push it to 4/5.
Takes practice seriously.
Will not commit to sobriety during practice.
EDIT:
Then double posts.
Come on juniors. Step up your game! Zoo Joos is carrying you with nothing but Dr. Who references. THOSE DON'T LAST FOREVER!