The Librarian
Banned
Re: matchmaking times in Halo 3. While it's pretty bearable because I love Halo so much, I'd love to see a decrease in the amount of time it takes to find a game.
Louis Wu said:You add the HaloGAF list to your Friends List - takes up one slot, and adds 100 people who like to play Halo more than the average player.
Then you add community lists like this from other communities (Tied the Leader, Good Game Network, HBO, whoever) - for each one slot you take up on your Friends List, you add another 100 players to choose from.
The likelihood that you won't be able to pull together a group falls the wider you're willing to spread your net. I play alone a lot of the time - but that's MY choice. There's almost ALWAYS dozens of people to choose from playing Halo on my FL, or my Friends of Friends.
Kuroyume said:Matchmaking is terrible. It's right up there with the current DLC model and episodic gaming as one of the worst things to happen in console gaming over the past decade. It's fine in most games because you're often given a base soldier and have an option of giving that soldier a fairly exstensive combination of weapons that you like, but in Halo Bungie decides all that. Playing AR starts on anything isn't fun at all. Duals is even worse. All this talk of load outs in Reach is good, but I'm remaining cautious. Nothing beats giving gamers all the control. If people want to play Avalanche BRs all the time... Then let them. That's what they want. They don't want to play Duals on Snowbound or Swords on Sandtrap. That is crap. Some of you dudes really overstate the difficulty of dealing with a list. The one hope I have for Reach is that the matchmaking is as good and fast as the one that was in Halo 2.
While I agree that it's less frustrating to jump into MM in a game like CoD where there are only about 5 different gametype variations and the pallet of starting weapons is constant across all modes, I think Reach will be better than Halo 3 in this regard. First and most importantly the veto system is revamped to offer 3 clear options and 1 random one so you won't veto ARs on gaurdian not knowing you'll get rockets on snowbound. I still wish they'd hide the votes as that'd make it a perfect veto system. Secondly we'll now have some options as to what we'll spawn with, Dream Crusher made it sound like there wasn't a very big variety of weapon loadouts and I doubt you'll be able to spawn with a DMR and pistol if you wanted to but at the very least the Reach magnum will be better than the god-awful shit we put up with in Halo 3 AR-starts.Kuroyume said:Matchmaking is terrible. It's right up there with the current DLC model and episodic gaming as one of the worst things to happen in console gaming over the past decade. It's fine in most games because you're often given a base soldier and have an option of giving that soldier a fairly exstensive combination of weapons that you like, but in Halo Bungie decides all that. Playing AR starts on anything isn't fun at all. Duals is even worse. All this talk of load outs in Reach is good, but I'm remaining cautious. Nothing beats giving gamers all the control. If people want to play Avalanche BRs all the time... Then let them. That's what they want. They don't want to play Duals on Snowbound or Swords on Sandtrap. That is crap. Some of you dudes really overstate the difficulty of dealing with a list. The one hope I have for Reach is that the matchmaking is as good and fast as the one that was in Halo 2.
Yup, when Bungie chooses to implement MM they take on a huge responsibility. They're responsible for making sure that players can hop in and MM will find something that tailors to their desired experience and provides the large variety of customized maps and gametypes users would want to play had the game used server lists. Halo 3 does an abysmal job at this. Like I said above, Reach will be undoubtedly better just from the new system in place, regardless of what garbage gets spawned to tailor to Joe AR and his frat buddies.electricpirate said:Matchmaking is a billion times better than server browsers, but that doesn't excuse Bungie's failures at expressing the customized experience their community has created a satisfactory way.
It's pretty fucking simple, dude. Yes, it's exterior to the game itself but don't pretend you have to 'jump through hoops' to do it.rar said:so i have to jump through hoops, cool!
EazyB said:I don't care if it's the best map, oftentimes playing 3 worse maps (not bad maps) between every game on your favorite map makes the entire experience more fun.
And that would lead to people only playing Avalanche.Kuroyume said:Matchmaking is terrible. It's right up there with the current DLC model and episodic gaming as one of the worst things to happen in console gaming over the past decade. It's fine in most games because you're often given a base soldier and have an option of giving that soldier a fairly exstensive combination of weapons that you like, but in Halo Bungie decides all that. Playing AR starts on anything isn't fun at all. Duals is even worse. All this talk of load outs in Reach is good, but I'm remaining cautious. Nothing beats giving gamers all the control. If people want to play Avalanche BRs all the time... Then let them. That's what they want. They don't want to play Duals on Snowbound or Swords on Sandtrap. That is crap. Some of you dudes really overstate the difficulty of dealing with a list. The one hope I have for Reach is that the matchmaking is as good and fast as the one that was in Halo 2.
I think that is more of a testament to Halo 3's fantastic gameplay and feature set, rather than matchmaking itself.Dani said:So terrible that millions of player constantly go back to the experience time after time, year after year. Yep, you're right.
You may not like it, but try staying away from making blanket statements that clearly not everyone shares.
I have to walk over and turn my xbox on to play Halo? Nice hoops, bungle/MS! Fuck it, I'll go play CS.rar said:so i have to jump through hoops, cool!
Didn't you say Bungie were lazy?rar said:so i have to jump through hoops, cool!
You're making Froman's sausage cry. He worked soooo hard.Kuroyume said:Matchmaking is terrible. It's right up there with the current DLC model and episodic gaming as one of the worst things to happen in console gaming over the past decade. It's fine in most games because you're often given a base soldier and have an option of giving that soldier a fairly exstensive combination of weapons that you like, but in Halo Bungie decides all that. Playing AR starts on anything isn't fun at all. Duals is even worse. All this talk of load outs in Reach is good, but I'm remaining cautious. Nothing beats giving gamers all the control. If people want to play Avalanche BRs all the time... Then let them. That's what they want. They don't want to play Duals on Snowbound or Swords on Sandtrap. That is crap. Some of you dudes really overstate the difficulty of dealing with a list. The one hope I have for Reach is that the matchmaking is as good and fast as the one that was in Halo 2.
big ander said:I have to walk over and turn my xbox on to play Halo? Nice hoops, bungle/MS! Fuck it, I'll go play CS.
/deathGui_PT said:You have to turn on your computer and log into your valve account
I would hate joining a game in progress, especially if the teams were unbalanced. BC2 also does this, and it is an extremely team oriented game. My qualms with that is notably the poor players who worry about their K/D rather than the objective itself. If I were to join a game already in progress, I rather it be a custom game being launched from a custom game browser. Because in that situation, I'm not going to be penalized with a loss, or if I were to quit out (and you know damn well people would once they're down a bit; hell, this happens now in Halo 3 with Slayer and Flag).Kenak said:I think that is more of a testament to Halo 3's fantastic gameplay and feature set, rather than matchmaking itself.
The matchmaking in Halo 3 sucks. I sometimes sit there for 5 minutes waiting for a game, only for it to be full of a bunch of red bars. Other times I get matched up instantly with perfect connection. Sometimes I wish it were like COD where I can count on joining a game instantly, even if it's already in progress or the teams are imbalanced ;_;
Gui... sometimes I forget that gif is animated and it freaks me outGui_PT said:You have to turn on your computer and log into your valve account
Prologue/Training sequence? :3Captain Blood said:Speaking of maps I wonder how they are going to shoehorn The Pit into Reach's campaign so we can have it in multiplayer
Captain Blood said:Speaking of maps I wonder how they are going to shoehorn The Pit into Reach's campaign so we can have it in multiplayer
I've been guilty of pissing and moaning that I don't get to play Avalanche, my favorite map, enough. Then I loaded up H3Ostats.Hydranockz said:And that would lead to people only playing Avalanche.
Captain Blood said:Speaking of maps I wonder how they are going to shoehorn Headlong into Reach's campaign so we can have it in multiplayer
Well yeah actually. I think the vertical spaces in that level would really work with the jetpack and whatnot.Thermite said:Fixed.A man can dream, right? ;(
And The Pit wouldn't??Hydranockz said:Well yeah actually. I think the vertical spaces in that level would really work with the jetpack and whatnot.
Achronos said:Yeah, screw that guy!
Captain Blood said:And The Pit wouldn't??
That is right I don't plan on letting the Boba Fett playlist go anytime soon.
I agree. I'm just sayin' that sometimes when I'm waiting around 5 minutes to get into a game, I start wishing it were like COD.Striker said:I would hate joining a game in progress, especially if the teams were unbalanced. BC2 also does this, and it is an extremely team oriented game. My qualms with that is notably the poor players who worry about their K/D rather than the objective itself. If I were to join a game already in progress, I rather it be a custom game being launched from a custom game browser. Because in that situation, I'm not going to be penalized with a loss, or if I were to quit out (and you know damn well people would once they're down a bit; hell, this happens now in Halo 3 with Slayer and Flag).
The "If its so bad, why do people still play it so much" theory is so bunk. Reminds me of the joke, or lack thereof, when Halo 3 would get #1 in the Live Activity charts and the playlists would be the word of praise.
Captain Blood said:Speaking of maps I wonder how they are going to shoehorn The Pit, Midship and Narrows into Reach's campaign so we can have it in multiplayer
EazyB said:Things I don't like about server lists:
1) when you have a full party and you all want to be on the same team, you create a room and whenever someone joins they see 5 people on one team and 0 on the other and back out immediately. Oftentimes it makes waiting for matches take even longer than it would had you gone through MM.
Sounds like there will be one...Letters said:Btw, no update today?
What the fuck's a Good Friday? Every Friday seems pretty damn good to me.Devin Olsen said:Sounds like there will be one...
I only found out today that Good Friday isn't recognized as a Stat holiday in America (I think?)... I always just assumed it was.
What?PedroLumpy said:It always seemed logical to me that a blended MM/server list system would have groups go into the matchmaking system, so that prefab teams would be match against each other, while loners would go into server list to choose exactly what they want to play.
If people don't want to fight a prefab team, that's not really a fault of server lists.
Devin Olsen said:Sounds like there will be one...
I only found out today that Good Friday isn't recognized as a Stat holiday in America (I think?)... I always just assumed it was.
EazyB said:What?
that would be so fucking badassOozer3993 said:They should include a Boba Fett helmet for your Spartan to sport on the battlefield.
facepalm.gifInvincibleAgent said:Some countries will create a holiday for anything :lol
InvincibleAgent said:Some countries will create a holiday for anything :lol
Or how about a Rocketeer helmet :lolvhfive said:that would be so fucking badass
WhatHowWhereWhenPopeck said:In Finland, mostly for getting drunk with different excuses. And Good Friday is called "Long Friday". Yeah, this has nothing to with Halo.
Yay, it's April already, the month in which I get to play Halo: Reach!
More like Jango Fett am I rightOozer3993 said:They should include a Boba Fett helmet for your Spartan to sport on the battlefield.
Less than 30 daysPopeck said:Yay, it's April already, the month in which I get to play Halo: Reach!
Popeck said:Yay, it's April already, the month in which I get to play Halo: Reach!
Not a Jellyfish said:Yeah I realized this when I hit college and I no longer was given the day off from classes for it, always had the day off in school up until that point.
F&F most likely. Popeck gets all the good stuff early.Letters said:beta starts May 3rd
Reading now, thanks for the link Sage-Devin.Devin Olsen said:
For others, it might mean that as the game goes on, youll have access to more and more choices based on a number of factors we can fiddle with.