• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Halo Reach Reveal Thread - Matchmaking/Multiplayer Details Revealed

Interesting about the official press release blunder about the mix up between whether or not its a S2 or S3 main character. Thought it was news-worthy so I posted it as a news story on GRU.

I'm really leaning towards SIII, just because I still hold out that Bungie will keep things interesting and mix it up a bit. Though I am honestly a bit bummed that he didn't say a word the ENTIRE cut scene - the rookie was a bit overkill as it was.
 
Buying ODST on Thursday after seeing that trailer. Just terrific. Hell I think I'll even try to get all the H3 and ODST achievements and even give Halo Wars a try. I also bought Fall of Reach.
 

kylej

Banned
Dark FaZe said:
Buying ODST on Thursday after seeing that trailer. Just terrific. Hell I think I'll even try to get all the H3 and ODST achievements and even give Halo Wars a try.

Please buy it used or off eBay. ODST is not worth $60.
 

Chorazin

Member
kylej said:
Please buy it used or off eBay. ODST is not worth $60.

Maybe not to you, but I didn't have any of the Halo 3 DLC maps. Combine that with ODST's SP and Firefight and I know it was worth $60 to me.
 
kylej said:
Please buy it used or off eBay. ODST is not worth $60.

I'm well aware that it isn't which is why I rented it day 1. I've got 5 earned gamefly dollars coming to me and will be purchasing the game on gamefly for 35 bucks which to me is a great for Halo Reach Beta, complete H3 multiplayer and the ODST experience.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
I didn't see this mentioned, but I assume it was and I missed it - skull guy's shoulder emblem looks straight out of multiplayer.

2ljg477.jpg
 

LCfiner

Member
Proelite said:
xxxjuicesxxx broke a lot of sarcasm meters. :lol

I think there's a difference between sarcasm and playing a joke character. His posts did not read like the former.

They certainly could (should?) have been the latter.
 

BerserkerBarage

Neo Member
Exypher said:
That would suck. How did this pan out with the Halo 3 beta?

Well, there were a couple more ways of getting into the Halo 3 Beta than we have with Reach. There was the "Friends and Family" program that went around the community. There was the "Rule of 3" winners that were selected via a contest on B.net. And then there were the people playing via Crackdown.

Crackdown specifically seems to be just like ODST. The disk is your ticket to Beta. And I don't think I remember people purchasing copies of Crackdown that didn't come with the Beta invite. So, I'd assume the same will be true with ODST. I don't think that MS has any plans to put out ODST SKUs that don't include Reach Beta.

Actually, I think they plan on doing quite the opposite. When it comes time for the Reach Beta, I'm sure MS will be pimpin' ODST as your only means of getting into it as a means to push sales. Can't think of a good counter-reason why they'd want to remove that lure.

~B.B.
 
U K Narayan said:
Directly before Halo 1. The gap between Reach and and Halo 1 will probably be a couple of days.
Not exactly.

From an earlier post I made.

Dax01 said:
Depends on when the game takes place. If the game takes place when the Covenant first attack Reach (disabling the UNSC's extraterrestial defenses and weapons platforms and the simultaneous ground assualt) then no. If the game takes place when the UNSC is forced to retreat, leaving their ground forces on the planet (i.e., the book "First Strike), then, yes, it's a possibility.

It looks like the game takes place during the latter, so it's possible.

Edit -

Major Williams said:
Interesting about the official press release blunder about the mix up between whether or not its a S2 or S3 main character. Thought it was news-worthy so I posted it as a news story on GRU.

I'm really leaning towards SIII, just because I still hold out that Bungie will keep things interesting and mix it up a bit. Though I am honestly a bit bummed that he didn't say a word the ENTIRE cut scene - the rookie was a bit overkill as it was.
It's a Spartan III. Otherwise, we probably wouldn't be getting the health bar during gameplay.
 
I am reading Halo: Evolutions right now and the spartan III's in the Headhunters story are so awesome, I hope that LWG in Reach plays like they do.
 

Jinjo

Member
Dax01 said:
It's a Spartan III. Otherwise, we probably wouldn't be getting the health bar during gameplay.

There's no health bar here.

2cd8txk.jpg


Guess you play as the Spartan II's too then?
 
Dax01 said:
It's a Spartan III. Otherwise, we probably wouldn't be getting the health bar during gameplay.
A Health bar means for certain it's an SIII? MC had one in Halo CE, and it could be a gameplay mechanic. Either way, I'm inclined to agree with you.

Any idea what the massive explosion is at the end of the trailer? Is it a massive anti-air? The trajectory doesn't even appear to be aimed at the ship in the air though. I'm leaning towards some sort of weapon that was fired into the air as opposed to an explosion on the ground.

Edit:
Jinjo said:
There's no health bar here.

2cd8txk.jpg


Guess you play as the Spartan II's too then?
Joke post?
 
Major Williams said:
A Health bar means for certain it's an SIII? MC had one in Halo CE, and it could be a gameplay mechanic. Either way, I'm inclined to agree with you.

Any idea what the massive explosion is at the end of the trailer? Is it a massive anti-air? The trajectory doesn't even appear to be aimed at the ship in the air though. I'm leaning towards some sort of weapon that was fired into the air as opposed to an explosion on the ground.
That was CE; we should be basing it off the last game that centered around the MC - Halo 3. In that, he didn't have a health bar. Plus, ODST had a health bar and, judging from from the leaked pictures, the player in Reach has more health than an ODST (which makes sense). While a spartan III is better than an ODST, a Spartan III is not as good as a Spartan II.
 

StUnNeR H2K

Member
WrikaWrek said:
I don't understand why people aren't convinced that this is how the game looks. Aside from the AA, it looks pretty standard.

What amazes me is how bitchy people are. Bungie just can't win when comes to pleasing the masses. I know you will never please everyone, but geez...

Plus I'll start judging graphically once we actually see gameplay footage. With any game/developer watching something early can always lead to disappointment in the end. Expectations are higher with each Halo game, and thus making disappointment that much higher when the crazy personal expectations are not met.
 
Jinjo said:
It is not a leaked Halo:Reach screen? Forgive me if I am mistaken, just jumped in this thread.

(I only see a shield bar)
lol you've been photo shopped.

Some people think the game will turn out like the trailer and others don't think it will, everyone should be able to gauge their hype where they wish haha. Toss me into the cautiously optimistic group. Also it probably should be noted that the trailer we just got is a LOT farther into the development cycle of Reach than the Halo 3 announcement trailer was for Halo 3 so take that as you will.
 
kylej said:
Please buy it used or off eBay. ODST is not worth $60.
£25 retail price in the UK lately, which imo is worth it for a large expansion pack :) Also the full H3 multi package on 1 dvd is worth owning.

I still need to buy it after selling my H3 LE tin. Sub £20 is my plan.
 

watership

Member
kylej said:
Please buy it used or off eBay. ODST is not worth $60.

Worth is such a funny word when used in absolutes like this. If you love Halo, it doesn't matter, its still not worth 60 dollars? What if you love firefight? Still not worth it? I don't understand this assertion. Not worth it to you.
 
Dax01 said:
That was CE; we should be basing it off the last game that centered around the MC - Halo 3. In that, he didn't have a health bar. Plus, ODST had a health bar and, judging from from the leaked pictures, the player in Reach has more health than an ODST (which makes sense). While a spartan III is better than an ODST, a Spartan III is not as good as a Spartan II.

I thought Spartan-III's were supposed to be superior in all aspect bar their armour. Bigger
, better, more badass
, stronger, smarter and better trained but with sucky armour.
LWG = spartan-III with mjolnir for bonus points and win?
 
DiabolicalBagel said:
I thought Spartan-III's were supposed to be superior in all aspect bar their armour. Bigger
, better, more badass
, stronger, smarter and better trained but with sucky armour.
http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Semi-Powered_Infiltration_Armor

Though more advanced than the ODST ballistic body armor, it was far less advanced, and less powerful than the MJOLNIR Armor used by the Spartan-IIs.

From the leaked screenshots, the player does have a shield. So, it could be that this Spartan III has been outfitted with some form of Mjolnir armor.
 

WrikaWrek

Banned
StUnNeR H2K said:
What amazes me is how bitchy people are. Bungie just can't win when comes to pleasing the masses. I know you will never please everyone, but geez...

Plus I'll start judging graphically once we actually see gameplay footage. With any game/developer watching something early can always lead to disappointment in the end. Expectations are higher with each Halo game, and thus making disappointment that much higher when the crazy personal expectations are not met.


Where is your avatar from?
 
What's the main difference in SIII and SII? maybe I missed it but one is faster and more agile then the other who is a beefcake? I probably know at the back of my mind but just don't remember.

Also what was Master Chief? he had too many revisions to remember anything much apart from his H2-3 setup.
 
Spartan II > Spartan III, no question.
I want to say Spartan IIIs went through less augmentation so that a wider range of recruits could be used but I don't have a direct source.
 
DiabolicalBagel said:
I'm sorry... but did you just try to counter me by confirming my arguement? or were you simply agreeing that S-III's are superior but have sucky armour?
What? Their armor is more advanced than an ODST. They don't have "sucky" armor - far from it. Did you even read what I linked?
 
StUnNeR H2K said:
What amazes me is how bitchy people are. Bungie just can't win when comes to pleasing the masses. I know you will never please everyone, but geez...

Plus I'll start judging graphically once we actually see gameplay footage. With any game/developer watching something early can always lead to disappointment in the end. Expectations are higher with each Halo game, and thus making disappointment that much higher when the crazy personal expectations are not met.

It's the internet, what do you expect? It's where people go to bitch and complain when nobody is around or cares enough to listen to them. I'm sure a majority of people agree that the graphics look great, you just have the haters out there that need to be heard.
 
StUnNeR H2K said:
What amazes me is how bitchy people are. Bungie just can't win when comes to pleasing the masses. I know you will never please everyone, but geez...
Expectations are directly proportional to hype. MS hypes every Halo as the very best FPS experience, evar. Its also marketed as the flagship Xbox 360 title.

With that in mind, people just want this to be true, and not just hype generation and spin. So yeah, that means best of breed graphics, gameplay, and utilization of Xbox Live features. Its a tough bar to pass, but that's what Bungie is being set up to deliver, for better or worse.

I think they've got it within them.
 
Dax01 said:
What? Their armor is more advanced than an ODST. They don't have "sucky" armor - far from it. Did you even read what I linked?

Yes, yes, I did. You are missing my point though. I mean that it is sucky in comparison to Mjolnir.
Considering that I was comparing S-II's and S-III's I wouldn't have thought ODST armour would have anything to do with it.

My argument is that, to my knowledge, S-III's are superior physically and mentally to S-II's and you shouldn't judge them on their armour.
While, yes, a S-II in Mjolnir is more effective than a S-III in SPI(I believe that was your argument) I would think if both were in Mjolnir the tables would turn.
 

Tashi

343i Lead Esports Producer
Midship alone was worth 60$ to me. I've already played a ton of games on that map and I'll continue to until Reach is released.
 

StUnNeR H2K

Member
DiabolicalBagel said:
My argument is that, to my knowledge, S-III's are superior physically and mentally to S-II's and you shouldn't judge them on their armour.

Don't think this is true... S-III's are quickly made so they don't have as much experience under their belt as the S-II's. The S-III's have some advantages, but overall a S-II is better with or without the armor.
 

GloveSlap

Member
StUnNeR H2K said:
What amazes me is how bitchy people are. Bungie just can't win when comes to pleasing the masses. I know you will never please everyone, but geez...

Plus I'll start judging graphically once we actually see gameplay footage. With any game/developer watching something early can always lead to disappointment in the end. Expectations are higher with each Halo game, and thus making disappointment that much higher when the crazy personal expectations are not met.
Halo haters know no bounds. I've seen the haters say that Halo has shitty vehicles and music before. I don't even pay attention to the irrational criticism anymore.
 

StUnNeR H2K

Member
GloveSlap said:
Halo haters know no bounds. I've seen the haters say that Halo has shitty vehicles and music before.

It's not just the haters... I know that Halo just as a franchise has a strong group of haters, but I see some of the same faces in here bashing Bungie/Halo that in about 9 months will not even care about any of this when they finally get a chance to play the game.
 

Nutter

Member
Ballistictiger said:
I agree. Remember this was suppose to be real time also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXrYSEOg3Ro but no you don't play a game in that quality unless it's on a PC.
You know I never understood why people didnt get major hints from that trailer. I dont care if its a cutscene from the game or w/e, that movie/trailer wasnt even shown in full 720p, it had black bars top and bottom. Red flags should have been thrown out then. The Reach trailer does not seem to be that way though. I know this will sound like blind faith, but tech improves over time and people learn new ways to make an engine shine. Heck COD MW2 is a Quake 2/3 engine for god sakes, yet it shines at times.

Though I will also say, haters will hate. First it was "oh this looks like crap" then it turned into " This looks too good for it to be in game" GTFO already.
 
DiabolicalBagel said:
Yes, yes, I did. You are missing my point though. I mean that it is sucky in comparison to Mjolnir.

I thought you were talking about in comparison to an ODST's armor, not Mjolnir.

My argument is that, to my knowledge, S-III's are superior physically and mentally to S-II's and you shouldn't judge them on their armour.
I wasn't judging anyone on his or her armor. The Spartan IIIs are not better than a Spartan IIs. From my impression of reading the books, the Spartan IIs are faster, stronger, and can better handle themselves under combat. Spartan IIIs are, essentially, cheaper versions of the Spartan IIs.
 
Top Bottom