The people in power do seem to think a small segment of Twitter should run their countries (into the ground).Australia just resumed funding for UNRWA a couple of weeks ago. It made my blood boil hearing this.
The people in power do seem to think a small segment of Twitter should run their countries (into the ground).Australia just resumed funding for UNRWA a couple of weeks ago. It made my blood boil hearing this.
The truth is, they won't agree to a state. That's why the best play for Israel is to push them into agreeing to one, as fucked up as it is, eventually Israel wants peace. It'll be a win win situation if they actually agree to a state, but if they won't the world will see that they just want the whole place.What is even the long term goal in this? ("demand of immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire")
Lets just assume Hamas returns all the hostages (at least half of them probably dead), what afterwards? Rebuild Gaza... and then? Give Palestinians their state?
What kind of message are we sending here? In order to achieve your goals, be a terrorist and slaughter as many innocent civilians as possible while sacrificing your own children.
Will Hamas just magically disappear with their own state? Or would they be worshipped as the achievers of the impossible? Will Hamas stop putting the majority of their ressources into destroying Israel?
Can anyone tell me what the UN thinks is going to happen?
Yep, fight to win, so you don't have to do it again in the near future.
Different types of conflicts. With Isreal, they are fighting a neighboring power, or you could maybe even call it an internal conflict, a civil war.While I may agree with this thought in a general sense, I can't help but look back at America's 23 years of military operations and $4 trillion dollars spent and see that it is way past the near future and America is still fighting (i.e. engaging in military operations to fight the war on terror). Is it because -
- America wasn't trying hard enough to win?
- America is trying hard enough, but it'll take longer than 20 years?
- Even though America is still militarily engaged internationally, America hasn't experienced another 9/11 level event, and that is an acceptable definition of winning.
- America withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021 and ended the combat mission against the IS in 2021, so by that definition, we're not fighting anymore, that's a win, and 20 years still counts as "near future".
- This strategy doesn't actually work very well for this particular set of problems.
Or is it something else that I haven't considered?
Anti-semitism has always been around, but there wasnt an Oct 7 event to spark them to all come out of the woodwork. And when you got so many mobs, protests, social media posts etc.... it's impossible to control them all. Then it becomes a situation where either it fizzles out or it keeps going.I was never a free speech absolutist. I believe in it generally, but I also do think censorship should apply in certain situations. Nothing has affirmed my stance on this more than what twitter has become since October 7th. Yeah, before Elon bought it, there was stuff on there that people got suspended for that was absurd, like stating biological facts. But the amount of hardcore antisemitism on that platform now is horrifying. I've never seen anything like it on any other social media platform. There are entire threads where it's someone making some post and all the replies are "Typical Jew response" "Get lost, Jew, nobody likes you." etc. And none of these accounts get deleted or suspended. And it's all they do everyday is spew out hatred against Jews.
Now I'm sure some of these accounts are foreign troll accounts meant to stoke flames. But not all of them. Anyone who thinks this type of garbage is healthy for any platform has allowed culture war nonsense to cloud their judgement. Excessive hatred should always be suppressed. You can't have stable communities without doing so. And I don't think the "Just block them" argument applies because there's so many of them. A lot of free speech absolutists use the argument that the reason to allow this type of hate is because you can just block it of you don't like it. If you're a user on there's who's Jewish and you are a user who has gotten the attention of the antisemitic corners of the platform, you'd have to spend half your time on the platform just blocking account after account.
My theory is just like 2020 emboldened a bunch of racist people who have agendas against demographics deemed "privileged" or majority and spew bigoted hateful things about them, the same is happening since October 7th.Anti-semitism has always been around, but there wasnt an Oct 7 event to spark them to all come out of the woodwork. And when you got so many mobs, protests, social media posts etc.... it's impossible to control them all. Then it becomes a situation where either it fizzles out or it keeps going.
As for free speech and censorship, I've always been a supporter of it being free as long as it doesn't get into realms of stupidity, off topic, lying or outright disgusting stuff.
Something like twitter is one where there is no core topic, so being off topic doesn't apply (like baking pies on a car forum unless there is a OT tab like GAF people can post what they want). But in terms of gross stuff like someone wanting to post snuff videos or purposely trying to lie to the masses in a bad way that stuff should be deleted.
Free speech within reason.
The long term solution to this is the EXACT SAME long term solution EVERY country eventually tries to implement.What is even the long term goal in this? ("demand of immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire")
Lets just assume Hamas returns all the hostages (at least half of them probably dead), what afterwards? Rebuild Gaza... and then? Give Palestinians their state?
What kind of message are we sending here? In order to achieve your goals, be a terrorist and slaughter as many innocent civilians as possible while sacrificing your own children.
Will Hamas just magically disappear with their own state? Or would they be worshipped as the achievers of the impossible? Will Hamas stop putting the majority of their ressources into destroying Israel?
Can anyone tell me what the UN thinks is going to happen?
Media here has turned the corner on aiding and abetting the murdering, raping terrorists.
Majority in U.S. Now Disapprove of Israeli Action in Gaza
A majority of U.S. adults now disapprove of Israel's military action in Gaza, a shift from the prior survey in November.news.gallup.com
Disgusted once again with this country but not surprised.
I am glad that you and yours are still safe. Hamas and their protectors can’t be defeated soon enough. Hopefully there is a day soon that things can be peaceful over in Isreal.Rocket interception blew up in front of me today. I was really close. Heard a loud sound, saw the iron dome interception and then BOOM, my wife who was in our apartment at the time said our apartment shook.
Here's an image from someone else who took a photo from their apartment window, I was a LOT LOT LOT closer, as in it was RIGHT in front of me in the sky. I was outside at the time and wasn't able to get back home fast enough and I had no time to take shelter from any potential falling shrapnel. I know I should have laid down in the shelter position on the ground but I just panicked and tried to run which was stupid of me and I was on a bunch of stairs.
The sirens didn't go off with it's usual 30 second time to get into a bomb shelter as the IDF said that the rocket (or drone? So many conflicting stories) wasn't aimed at the town where we live (apparently) , but still I think if there's a rocket interception literally over where we live there really should be.
Just insane. But G0D protects. So nothing to worry about. Still I can't wait for Hizbollah to be destroyed.
The hamas propaganda is strong. Anytime I even see a side glance at anything on Twitter or tiktok etc it's all people with Palestinian flags in their bios and spreading crazy misinformation.Media here has turned the corner on aiding and abetting the murdering, raping terrorists.
Majority in U.S. Now Disapprove of Israeli Action in Gaza
A majority of U.S. adults now disapprove of Israel's military action in Gaza, a shift from the prior survey in November.news.gallup.com
Disgusted once again with this country but not surprised.
It's not Hamas, it's an evil axis that promotes it like China, Iran and Russia.So long story short, unfortunately the social media propaganda machine for hamas is just getting stronger it seems.
The UK Met Police continues to demonstrate what a spineless and incompetent organization it is.
The UK Met Police continues to demonstrate what a spineless and incompetent organization it is.
The UK Met Police continues to demonstrate what a spineless and incompetent organization it is.
You can change England into whole Western Europe. They're a problem everywhere...I gotta think there is a daily brief at high levels that is just flabbergasted at how many (potentially) violent young Muslim men they have allowed to accrue in England and how disastrous it would be if they decided to REALLY get out and cause trouble.
But appeasement....has that ever worked long term?
Keep it secret. Keep itsafe.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to shut down local operations of a Qatar-based news channel after Israel's parliament approved what is known as the "Al-Jazeera law" which allows broadcasters from abroad to be shut down if they are deemed to pose a risk to state security.
Israeli lawmakers voted in favour of the legislation on Monday in the second and third readings.
Under the law, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi can order the closure of a television broadcaster, the confiscation of broadcasting equipment, the removal of the broadcaster from cable and satellite television providers' programmes and the blocking of its website, ynet news site reported.
"Al-Jazeera damaged Israel’s security, actively participated in the massacre on October 7th and incited Israeli soldiers," Netanyahu wrote on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.
“Al-Jazeera will no longer broadcast from Israel. I intend to act immediately in accordance with the new law to stop the channel's activity," he continued.
In the officers' defence, it's not illegal to wear/have Swastika or Nazi memorabilia in England. He's not able to articulate himself very well here, and it is difficult to explain this to people in a way that doesn't cause offence or imply that there is nothing wrong with the Swastika. He's not wrong though, Swastika's need to be taken in context that demonstrates how it is being used to propagate a hate crime, in which case he can make an arrest. Or if the symbolism is being used in conjunction with a public order offence. He doesn't make the laws, he just governs them, unfortunately some of our laws are stupid and need to be changed.Wow, active and overt defending of Nazi imagery by officers. England, you need to get your shit together. Fire these cunts.
Which will do nothing, because they are trained to act this way.Wow, active and overt defending of Nazi imagery by officers. England, you need to get your shit together. Fire these cunts.
A bit of a take when even they admitted it was a mistake, clearance was given but somehow that didn't get through to whoever was operating the drones. Seven aid workers are dead due to a communication error, it's not the best look sadly.Driving through Gaza might get you killed. News at 11.
In the officers' defence, it's not illegal to wear/have Swastika or Nazi memorabilia in England. He's not able to articulate himself very well here, and it is difficult to explain this to people in a way that doesn't cause offence or imply that there is nothing wrong with the Swastika. He's not wrong though, Swastika's need to be taken in context that demonstrates how it is being used to propagate a hate crime, in which case he can make an arrest. Or if the symbolism is being used in conjunction with a public order offence. He doesn't make the laws, he just governs them, unfortunately some of our laws are stupid and need to be changed.
Interesting that the three brits were all ex-military, where they security for the aid workers, mercs, or there for some other reason? Let the conspiracy begin!!
Still, never a great outcome if it was a legit aid convoy, but it is a war zone for a good reason.
The officer is getting grilled under the assumption that he is defending the idea that the swastika is not antisemitic. When he says 'it needs to be taken in context' he is referring to making an arrest, not that the swastika as a symbol needs to be taken into context to determine whether it is antisemitic or not. It feels more like miscommunication on the officer's part, and assertion on the woman's part. You can see him clearly stating "I didn't say it wasn't, did I?" when they suggest that his stating the swastika is not antisemitic. The problem here is that he doesn't state that it is antisemitic, probably because he is defending the position he has to take in order to make an arrest with those pro-Palestinian supporters waving swastika signs. Though, I agree 100% with you, anyone waving those signs/flags with swastikas on are antisemitic and racist.There is nothing you can see the swastika as in this case other than overt antisemitism using the group that single handedly tried to exterminate the entire Jewish population from this planet. This isn't some historical documentary, this isn't an actor in costume leaving set, these are racists. Pure and simple.
if it was a legit aid convoy
What's with the tone here? They've already admitted it was a communication mistake, a fuck up which cost 7 people just helping out their lives which Israel has already admitted too.If these people were innocent and just trying to help, then this is a sad situation
Interesting that the three brits were all ex-military, where they security for the aid workers, mercs, or there for some other reason? Let the conspiracy begin!!
Still, never a great outcome if it was a legit aid convoy, but it is a war zone for a good reason.
If you enter a war zone, you should always expect that you life could be cut short at any moment. Whether it is an "approved" route or not. War is war and no one is safe. If these people were innocent and just trying to help, then this is a sad situation, but not one that is outside the realm of possibility and something they knew going in.
However, given the continued obfuscation of "aid work" being used to transport weapons and aid terrorists? I am not going to immediately assume innocence or guilt until there is plenty of evidence to suggest such. Always better to be on the side of skepticism and caution than immediately assume guilt or innocence in these situations.
Netanyahu seeks to use 'Al Jazeera' law to shut down broadcaster
One less mouthpiece for that Islamist propaganda outlet sounds like a good thing.
Wars are never fair and usually dirty.IDF really needs to do much better. When clearly marked aid convoys are targeted you know that little care is given with civilians in other instances. Like when the Israelis with their hands up were mistakenly shot. How many times are Palestinian civilians shot with their hands up, then? It’s probably not the only time this is happening.
I get that, but this is really low-balling the situation. IDF is really trying its best, and it is the best compared to other combat situation in the last decade and more.IDF really needs to do much better. When clearly marked aid convoys are targeted you know that little care is given with civilians in other instances. Like when the Israelis with their hands up were mistakenly shot. How many times are Palestinian civilians shot with their hands up, then? It’s probably not the only time this is happening.
What exactly do you want Israel to do? stop the war, wait a few years, do it again?The US isn’t going to support Israel in an old school holy war.
What exactly do you want Israel to do? stop the war, wait a few years, do it again?
Sorry, that's not true. Israel has done everything the US asked it, and the US is the reason for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. If it let Israel blockade Gaza, no food, no fuel, no nothing, for 1 month, you'd see the people in Gaza revolt or even Hamas inner people do it because they have family who they don't wanna see starve.Israel has every right to defend themselves, but what do you want the USA to do realistically?
They've been asking for Netanyahu to allow more aid in and he has constantly said no. They've asked Israel not to attack Rafah due to the dire circumstances in Gaza right now and he's probably not going to listen. Authorising more illegal settlements to be built, despite it being illegal in the middle of a war isnt exactly grand either.
Killing 7 aid workers, in marked vehicles, who Israel knew about with at least a double pass of a drone is hard for any country to defend.
Alot of world leaders have spent significant political capital assisting Israel, but it does have it's limits.
Have higher standards of conduct.What exactly do you want Israel to do?
Every data shows IDF has the highest standard of combat. If it didn't, I wouldn't need to read everyday on more fallen soldiers.Have higher standards of conduct.