• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bolivia declares Israel a terrorist state

Status
Not open for further replies.

diaspora

Member
"Within six weeks, an estimated 800,000 Tutsi, representing about three-quarters of the Tutsi then remaining in Rwanda...had been killed.”
― Jared Diamond, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed

That, that is ethnic cleansing. You demean the term by applying it to Israel's excessive force and brutality.

Ethnic cleansing is more of a catch-all term that includes genocide.
 
That quote was proven in the other thread to be full of shit.

'proven' to be edited together from separate quotes taken out of context and slapped onto a meme image, yes.

But I could swear that even in context the latter half of the quote is a chilling endorsement of collective punishment on a civilian population.
 
No, that is genocide. Ethnic cleansing simply involves actions that result in the removal (not necessarily via killing them) of a population group from a certain location. Large-scale lethal violence may be employed, but is not a prerequisite (unlike genocide where lethal violence and the willingness to commit lethal violence, a.k.a. mens rea, is a prerequisite). Many instances of population transfers in the 20th century were de facto acts of ethnic cleansing. By destroying infrastructure and housing the Israeli government is attempting to force the Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza. This fits the 'technical' definition of ethnic cleansing.

For example. What is happening all over the Middle East. From ISIS in Iraq, to homosexuals in Iran, to the Christians in Pakistan, to the christians in the Sudan, back to ISIS with the Shiites, then right over to homosexuals and adulterers, then back to ISIS ... then some more shiites ...
 

Esch

Banned
I say one is a heavy handed response to a pathetic fighting force, you say it's ethnic cleansing. Just because you want to ignore the rather glaring differences between the two doesn't mean there aren't any.

Okay, well when the Palestinian people and nation have been wiped from the face of the earth hopefully you'll come around.

~1,200 lives taken in the space of a couple of weeks? Homes, mosques, and hospitals destroyed, nowhere safe to hide or flee, neutral parties like the UN targeted along with Palestinian civilians.

"Not terrorism! Not ethnic cleansing! Harsh language!"
 

diaspora

Member
Okay, well when the Palestinian people and nation have been wiped from the face of the earth hopefully you'll come around.

~1,200 lives taken in the space of a couple of weeks? Homes, mosques, and hospitals destroyed, nowhere safe to hide or flee, neutral parties like the UN targeted along with Palestinian civilians.

"Not terrorism! Not ethnic cleansing! Harsh language!"

Fucking hilarious. The palestinian people are absolutely the victims of Israel's brutality, they are not the victims of ethnic cleansing. You want to conflate the two as being the same? Go ahead, but all that does is trivialize real events.
 
'proven' to be edited together from separate quotes taken out of context and slapped onto a meme image, yes.

But I could swear that even in context the latter half of the quote is a chilling endorsement of collective punishment on a civilian population.
Even taken separately the sentences are bone chilling and eye opening.
 

Skyzard

Banned
Okay, well when the Palestinian people and nation have been wiped from the face of the earth hopefully you'll come around.

Fucking hilarious. The palestinian people are absolutely the victims of Israel's brutality, they are not the victims of ethnic cleansing.

Genocide, it's hilarious.

79TgJge.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzWJDqYx6NM
 
I say one is a heavy handed response to a pathetic fighting force, you say it's ethnic cleansing. Just because you want to ignore the rather glaring differences between the two doesn't mean there aren't any.

What? This post ignores Israel's expansion. I almost confused it for a joke post. Israel's aggression is not only because of Hamas's existence. Talk about being disengenuous.
 

diaspora

Member
Please, your intention was clear enough.

He was differentiating one type of violence from others.

What they are doing is genocide. Their civilian kill rate is 80%.

80%

Those maps show Israel's intent and actions to wipe Palestinians, which you bolded and laughed at.

You keep posting things that are definitively not genocide, it's worth laughing at. What happened with the Tutsis and Kurds was genocide, this is a brutal invasion and occupation.

What? This post ignores Israel's expansion. I almost confused it for a joke post. Israel's aggression is not only because of Hamas's existence. Talk about being disengenuous.

Israel's current aggression is both the fault of Israel and Hamas as I've already said.
 

Kyzer

Banned
Seems like an overreaction.

Does Israel go too far killing innocent people? Definitely. But are they calling for the destruction of countries/nations and intentionally claiming responsibility for each death? Not even close.

You don't need to be the fictionalized version of Saddam's Iraq to be considered terrorist though
 
Fucking hilarious. The palestinian people are absolutely the victims of Israel's brutality, they are not the victims of ethnic cleansing. You want to conflate the two as being the same? Go ahead, but all that does is trivialize real events.

So where's the breakpoint? 10k population moved? 50k? More?

You seem to be setting some arbitrary number to what you feel justifies calling a scenario "ethnic cleansing"

In reality the only person who's trivializing the term is you.
 

diaspora

Member
As you are a friend, ill let you know you are upsetting Penelope Cruz.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...ning-israel-for-genocide-in-gaza-9637188.html

Quick, someone get Ja Rule on the phone!

So where's the breakpoint? 10k population moved? 50k? More?

You seem to be setting some arbitrary number to what you feel justifies calling a scenario "ethnic cleansing"

In reality the only person who's trivializing the term is you.

Numbers are irrelevant to whether or not something is ethnic cleansing, targeting an ethnicity would make it so which isn't what's happening.
 

M3d10n

Member
Seems like an overreaction.

Does Israel go too far killing innocent people? Definitely. But are they calling for the destruction of countries/nations and intentionally claiming responsibility for each death? Not even close.

Terrorism is a term that defines the method, not the end goal.
 
40% of present Gaza strip has been taken over by the IDF forcing the population northward,
push anymore north and people will be forced into the sea
 
At the very least Israel certainly are using terror tactics. Also as much as I despise the current way Israel is behaving can we not use the word genocide where it doesn't belong?
 

Goliath

Member

Oh god.....not this picture again.

These pictures and random edited internet quotes do nothing but mislead people who don't know any better.

Here are the things wrong with that picture:

- First picture Falsely labels the Green land as Palestine. There was no Palestine, that land belonged to the British so what it should say in Green is British Empire Colony.

- Second picture shows what the UN plan was which was rejected by the Arab League which lead to the 1948 war which lead to the third picture that shows the Green incorrect again. Gaza should be labeled as Egypt and West Bank should be labled as Jordan because they took those territories after invading it to better attack Israel soon after it's formation.

But hey who cares about accuracy. A quick propaganda picture is far more effective then learning history.
 

Skyzard

Banned
^Land occupied under war, despite what the Israelis would like, does not stay as land of the occupier.


Those maps are misleading, and aren't ethnographical.



You found a celebrity that mis-uses the same word.

Those maps are accurate. I posted the video to verify as I knew it is a common claim by Israeli defenders that they are misleading when that's rubbish.

The celebrities and hundreds of thousands around the world that have been chanting it the last few days just had to read the news to see the number and kind of atrocities committed against people already oppressed.
 

maharg

idspispopd
No, that is genocide. Ethnic cleansing simply involves actions that result in the removal (not necessarily via killing them) of a population group from a certain location. Large-scale lethal violence may be employed, but is not a prerequisite (unlike genocide where lethal violence and the willingness to commit lethal violence, a.k.a. mens rea, is a prerequisite). Many instances of population transfers in the 20th century were de facto acts of ethnic cleansing. By destroying infrastructure and housing the Israeli government is attempting to force the Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza. This fits the 'technical' definition of ethnic cleansing.

Note: Palestinians in Gaza are legally and practically forbidden from leaving Gaza even in the best of times. Ideally l Israel is bombing the duck out of them *and* forcing them to stay. I think the last estimate I saw suggested that half if not more of the Gaza strip has been rendered uninhabitable or placed in the expanded no man's land of 3km at the Gaza-Israel border. And that was before blowing up their power pant.

Whatever you call what's going on right now, it's awful and blatantly disproportionate by any reasonable measure, and the negative consequences for the civilians of Gaza will last much much longer than this conflict.
 
Interestingly countries that have actually committed genocide ... have received probably less than a 1% of the outrage and attack Israel has received.

Really makes you wonder if Israel did just 'bulldoze' them into the sea, whether after the initial 'omg you murders' there would be any lasting impact ... most other countries that have committed documented genocide just omit it from their text books and pretend it never happened.
 
Numbers are irrelevant to whether or not something is ethnic cleansing, targeting an ethnicity would make it so which isn't what's happening.

So then what wax the point of your original post? The impact of your post was from the 800k people in a short time being moved / murdered.

People are tossing the term around because Israelies are killing Muslims and displacing them. If it's not a form of ethnic cleansing, maybe you could elaborate more.
 

diaspora

Member
Interestingly countries that have actually committed genocide ... have received probably less than a 1% of the outrage and attack Israel has received.

Really makes you wonder if Israel did just 'bulldoze' them into the sea, whether after the initial 'omg you murders' there would be any lasting impact ... most other countries that have committed documented genocide just omit it from their text books and pretend it never happened.

Khmer Rouge

So then what wax the point of your original post? The impact of your post was from the 800k people in a short time being moved / murdered.

People are tossing the term around because Israelies are killing Muslims and displacing them. If it's not a form of ethnic cleansing, maybe you could elaborate more.

The point wasn't the number of people, the point was Rwandans dragging out other Rwandans for slaughter for being an ethnicity. There isn't anything analogous to this happening in the current conflict.
 

Damaniel

Banned
Israel's only goal is to take out Hamas. If you remove that, you can bet they would want nothing to do with Gaza like how they left it in 2005.

Their priorities are misaligned but they're not terrorists. You also can't ignore Israel is not claiming any deliberate civilian attacks. Whenever Hamas bombs a school or kidnap people, they claim they wanted that.

That's their claim. Their actions demonstrate they want to take out a whole lot more than that.

As long as they keep targeting civilians and saying 'oops, our bad!' every time they do (in some pathetic attempt to make people think it's not an intentional act), I'll continue to not believe them.

I hate bullies, and Israel is one of the biggest of them all (no doubt emboldened by their support from an arguably bigger one...), and like Bolivia says, Israel is fitting the definition of 'terrorists' quite nicely (of course, so is Hamas -- both sides are in the wrong here, but the civilians of only one side of the conflict are in any actual danger.)
 

Goliath

Member
I clearly said expansion. Hamas isn't to blame for lands Israel has decided to take.

Nope, Egypt and Jordan are. Hamas is to blame for a fear and distrust of the community in Gaza and West Bank because they chose to resolve their grievences with suicide bombings, kidnapping and the declaration of wanting to kill all Jews. Then the people of Gaza voted these guys into office.
 

kmag

Member
For example. What is happening all over the Middle East. From ISIS in Iraq, to homosexuals in Iran, to the Christians in Pakistan, to the christians in the Sudan, back to ISIS with the Shiites, then right over to homosexuals and adulterers, then back to ISIS ... then some more shiites ...
The difference is bub, the taxpayers in the US and the EU aren't paying for those other situations, with the arguable exception of Iraq (and it wasn't like Iraq didn't raise the ire of significant numbers of people in the West either). The US pays for Israeli's military might, and the EU, US and Japan basically fund the imprisonment of the Palestinians. That's why people in the West get up in arms over it, we're effing funding it and continue to do so.
 
Interestingly countries that have actually committed genocide ... have received probably less than a 1% of the outrage and attack Israel has received.

Really makes you wonder if Israel did just 'bulldoze' them into the sea, whether after the initial 'omg you murders' there would be any lasting impact ... most other countries that have committed documented genocide just omit it from their text books and pretend it never happened.

I doubt it, so you're probably right. As it stands only a handful of South American countries have had anything to say about this. I doubt the US, the EU, or the UN would do much other than a few words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom