I feel like the only person here who loved all of Season 3 and didn't find any of it a waste. :"(
I have to say, I don't know how much this says about me rather than the show itself, but this hour, and this half season really, evoked so much sexual metaphor.
Well, it probably says as much about you as it does about me that I haven't seen sexuality as having anything to do with their relationship.
I see it as an incredibly intimate bond between two soulmates who have no sexual interest in the other. I find it very refreshing to have a story like that(regardless of gender).
Right, what I mean is their whole relationship reads like sexual metaphor even when they don't have any literal sexual interest in each other.
Perhaps it really does.
I've just never identified it that way. I suppose I'm not made to. ¯\_(ツ_/¯
- TVLine: Hannibal First Look: Meet Will's Wife and the Red Dragon's Lady Love! *Spoilers*
There's so much to talk about in this episode, but the cinematography was top-notch. Really nice use of color (red, especially).
I also absolutely love the Dracula-esque image of Hannibal appearing on the shadows of Alana's room.
I actually find that a rare visual misstep for the show, as I think it's pretty goofy looking.
- TVLine: Hannibal First Look: Meet Will's Wife and the Red Dragon's Lady Love! *Spoilers*
I started this series a week ago and just caught up today.
The stylistic shifts this series experiences through the course of the last two seasons and now has really messed with my head.
Fuller' could've easily taken his time with the material, using more episodic killer-of-the-week format like early season 1... But the last half of season 2 and season 3 almost ditched that format completely. I'm impressed.
He was so hard.Okay, Lecter might have had an erection here.
Will spit Cordell's ear out.
DOES THAT MAKE HIM A QUITTER!?
Will spit Cordell's ear out.
DOES THAT MAKE HIM A QUITTER!?
Not alone there. i think im going to do a S3 rewatch before this Saturday.I feel like the only person here who loved all of Season 3 and didn't find any of it a waste. :"(
Absolutely. Expect the movies to be very, very different than Hannibal though. The books are closer in line to the show but still very different from my recollection (been about 10+ years since i read my last Harris novel).So I haven't posted at all in this thread since I binge watched the first two seasons and am only now caught up, so excuse me if this has been asked before (as I'm sure it has)
Are the novels/movies as good as the show? This show is really my first exposure to Hannibal as a character as I've never seen the movies. I never really considered them, since I just kinda figured they were standard slasher flicks where the villain happens to eat people. If the novels have a similar tone to the show then I'll for sure have to dive into those as soon as I can. These characters really are fantastically captivating, and of course the imagery is incredible.
After catching up, I dunno what's more surprising; the fact that this show ran for three seasons on NBC or the fact that it's likely not to be picked up by anyone else. It's just way too good for network television.
So I haven't posted at all in this thread since I binge watched the first two seasons and am only now caught up, so excuse me if this has been asked before (as I'm sure it has)
Are the novels/movies as good as the show? This show is really my first exposure to Hannibal as a character as I've never seen the movies. I never really considered them, since I just kinda figured they were standard slasher flicks where the villain happens to eat people. If the novels have a similar tone to the show then I'll for sure have to dive into those as soon as I can. These characters really are fantastically captivating, and of course the imagery is incredible.
I feel like the only person here who loved all of Season 3 and didn't find any of it a waste. :"(
Haha, thanks.Solo driving by and Monocle elegantly ripping his axle out from the undercarriage is one of my new favorite things with this thread.
All of this is accurate IMO.Well first off, the movies are no where near the show in terms of visuals or music or general presentation. Some of them are well made, yes, but Hannibal the show is in a completely different realm with its presentation.
As for quality, Silence of the Lambs is the most famous for a reason, it's great. To this day it is still a great film, though there are aspects of it that are clearly straight out of the 90's. As a whole though, it's very well made across the board and definitely worth watching.
Everything else is a little iffy. Red Dragon has some endearing elements, Hannibal too, but to a lesser degree. I can't speak for Manhunter (I really need to find that one). Red Dragon has Ralph Fiennes doing some good stuff, Hannibal has more Anthony Hopkins and a very well hidden Gary Oldman, but neither are anywhere near the quality or intrigue of the show or Silence of the Lambs. I'd say you should definitely watch Silence of the Lambs and then consider watching the others, if only for your own curiosity and education.
I think most here will agree though that the show is kind of the best adaptation of the source material in just about every way.
I am with you there 100%. I thought that all of season 3 has been amazing and really enjoyed the initial few episodes for the extreme surreal, dreamlike qualities (though I am glad it drifted out of that dream).
So I haven't posted at all in this thread since I binge watched the first two seasons and am only now caught up, so excuse me if this has been asked before (as I'm sure it has)
Are the novels/movies as good as the show? This show is really my first exposure to Hannibal as a character as I've never seen the movies. I never really considered them, since I just kinda figured they were standard slasher flicks where the villain happens to eat people. If the novels have a similar tone to the show then I'll for sure have to dive into those as soon as I can. These characters really are fantastically captivating, and of course the imagery is incredible.
After catching up, I dunno what's more surprising; the fact that this show ran for three seasons on NBC or the fact that it's likely not to be picked up by anyone else. It's just way too good for network television.
I haven't seen Hannibal or Hannibal Rising, so I can't speak about their quality, but Manhunter and Silence are great. The 2002 Red Dragon adaption can (and should) be skipped. Red Dragon (the novel) is definitely worth reading, but don't go in expecting the type of relationship Will and Lecter have in the show. I still need to read Silence, but I just don't find the character of Clarice (and her relationship with Hannibal) interesting at all, especially compared to Will('s).
Edit: As for the show as a faithful adaption, Petersen is still the closest to Graham in the novel. Dancy's Graham is just beyond messed up, I guess for the sake of style. I do think that Fishburne is the best Crawford. I don't mind the gender change of Lounds, but Lang's portrayal is the perfect scumbag. I haven't read enough Harris to say anything about Lecter.
It was his cheek.
No pyjama party for you En Ex.
this shit's perfect yoOkay, Lecter might have had an erection here.
Very lttp on this but I only recently learned Hugh Dancy and Claire Danes are married, which made me laugh. What a perfectly (fictional) dysfunctional pair.
For some reason I read this in Verger's voice.
I think she was disappointed that Abigail and Beverly were ultimately victims. From her writings, she seemed invested in Abigail's agency in particular. I remember her commenting on her Tumblr that Hannibal was still a good show, but not the one she wanted.Anyone know why elucipher no longer writes on Hannibal? Loved her/his examinations.
I think she was disappointed that Abigail and Beverly were ultimately victims. From her writings, she seemed invested in Abigail's agency in particular.
I wish she hadn't destroyed all of her episode writeups and meta comments. They were the best Hannibal analyses I've ever read. I can't even find the damn things archived anywhere. Very disappointing.
Yeah, I mean, I can understand feeling alienated by a show. I believe an artist should have control over their work to a reasonable extent. All she really did was prune her personal blog. It's just such a shame to deprive the fan community of her insight. She saw layers in Hannibal that I didn't know existed, and the way she articulated the symbolism and themes was really second to none. Her appreciation of the show massively increased mine.I figured it had to be something related to some of the women of Hannibal.
That's a shame. Pretty childish to completely remove ALL write-ups.
I think she was disappointed that Abigail and Beverly were ultimately victims. From her writings, she seemed invested in Abigail's agency in particular. I remember her commenting on her Tumblr that Hannibal was still a good show, but not the one she wanted.
I wish she hadn't destroyed all of her episode writeups and meta comments. (Maybe they're just private now?) They were the best Hannibal analyses I've ever read. I can't even find the damn things archived anywhere. A real loss.