They also thought Redfall was good so there is thatApparently Microsoft's internal mock reviews had this in the 90s.
With Disco Elysium? You lost me there mateNo comments on the score.
A movie masquerading as a game is a bit too pretentiousness, this is purely a vanity project made for the select enthusiasts and critics. I had the same thoughts for Disco Elysium, Alan Wake & to some extent Death Stranding.
Don't get me wrong - I'm very much in support of niche, indie art pieces, flawed yet beautiful is what drives humanity forward but only if they are in a proper form.
Tried this on PC earlier, 4090 doesn't hit close to 60fps at 40k with DLAA, but with DLSS quality it's getting mid 90's, it's a real treat visually, but i
Love seeing my friend list light up with people playing Hellblade 2.
Surround yourself in life with people who have exceptional tastes
Foamstars, Rise of the Ronin and that game with tits were all critical and commercial Flops. Missed hardware targets with downgrades forecast. Hope everything is OK at Sony.
Hope everything is OK in the chicken coop.
Is 81 MC no longer a critical flop?
And there he is with the predictable 10. As I said last week, they will all come out with the hyperbole . There is a reason people like this are given pre release codes. I wish more fellow Xbox fans would see through these sell outs.
Every single time, their own words, comes back to bite them in the ass.Hope everything is OK in the chicken coop.
Chickens are busy playing Hellblade 2. Ask them in 5 hoursHope everything is OK in the chicken coop.
Dude would have given it a 3 if it was on any other platform instead lol
And there he is with the predictable 10. As I said last week, they will all come out with the hyperbole . There is a reason people like this are given pre release codes. I wish more fellow Xbox fans would see through these sell outs. Onto that showcase hype next . All of them complicit in where Xbox is.
https://stevivor.com/reviews/death-stranding-review-dead-arrival/Dude would have given it a 3 if it was on any other platform instead lol
Apparently Microsoft's internal mock reviews had this in the 90s.
If it's barely interactive how it's not a terrible game? Because of graphics and audio? These things absolutely doesn't matter if there is no game in a "game".mean the game isn't terrible but it's barely interactive
Come on. With all the best will in the world, if the game can only get to a five hour run time, with simplistic combat and puzzles, there is no way in hell the graphics alone can push it up to a 10/10. That's Elden Ring/BG3/ToTK territory.
This is shilling at its most extreme.
You have a point but for some people gameplay isn't as important as the whole package.If it's barely interactive how it's not a terrible game? Because of graphics and audio? These things absolutely doesn't matter if there is no game in a "game".
This game better be a financial hit or Ninja Theory is toast.
The game is already big bomba on Steam, they are toastI don't know if this was mentioned before, but imagine this game took 4 years to make, and it's only 5 hours long.
4 years = 48 months / 5 hours = 9.6 months
9.6 months per 1 hour of gameplay (insert movie jokes here) .
This game better be a financial hit or Ninja Theory is toast.
Every post about this seems to ignore the size of the development team.I don't know if this was mentioned before, but imagine this game took 4 years to make, and it's only 5 hours long.
4 years = 48 months / 5 hours = 9.6 months
9.6 months per 1 hour of gameplay (insert movie jokes here) .
This game better be a financial hit or Ninja Theory is toast.
Every post about this seems to ignore the size of the development team.
You can’t disable the black bars on PC? That’s idiotic.The game is already big bomba on Steam, they are toast
Is 81 MC no longer a critical flop?
thats true next gen for yaYou can’t disable the black bars on PC? That’s idiotic.
80 people from mid 2021 onwards (full production) and seemingly 40 before that, so likely ~300 man years in total. For comparison, Alan Wake 2 was made by 130 people over 4 years, so 520 man years total, and Remedy consider themselves a "small" developer.How small are they? Last I heard there are 80 people with MS's financial powers "war chest" backing them up. An 80-person team aint small, especially with that MS money.
Last I heard it was around 200 people. That's not enough? And I don't even know why people are saying this game took 4 years to make as if they weren't making the game before they even revealed it.Every post about this seems to ignore the size of the development team.
Maybe it is, but based on your posts, you were going to post that no matter what the actual game was. Absolutely laughable.It's worse than the first game: