Like literally nothing in this post is true.
Monsanto isn't the only company that makes GMOs, seeds are less efficient if reused, and GMOs aren't tasteless at all.
The scientific consensus is that GMOs are safe.
I never said they weren'T safe to use, I'm saying that the pushback from GMOs is way more tied to their "one and done" approach than anything else.
Also the use of the "GMO" term is super misguiding. We have been altering genes on crops/food knowingly for over 5 centuries now. It isn't the act of altering it that's beeng called into question, it's the underlying nature/goal of it beeing done *now* that is beeing called out.
Farmers beeing completely dependant on seed makers is a very real problem. They're prety much prisonners of them.
The initial pushback for Organic food/anti GMO diatribe came prety much (at least in Europe) from those farmers who were fed up of conglomerates like Monsanto dictating them everything.
But hey, by all means, keep thinking that GMOs make aliments (on the whole) healthier or tastier. That's not the goal, it's to make them more standardized. Standard size, shape, color, weight, taste, etc.. to facilitate their display on shelves and attract the consumer's eyes. This is why you such such an homogenisation of the food products on your shelves.