• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Hey, atheists! You can go to heaven too!" - The Pope

Status
Not open for further replies.

Razorback

Member
It is almost impossible to stick 100% to scripture. As someone raised fundamentalist turned agnostic, I have read the Bible cover to cover multiple times and realize that it is inconsistent and illogical when one tries to apply 100% literal / consistency.

There are enough statement which are believed to be Jesus words which have some overriding concepts and direction. Mostly a push towards love, acceptance and the idea that judgement belongs in God's hands not people.

This is where the pope is right on. You can't continue to pick and choose on making at huge deal on some areas and not others (like homosexuality while ignoring the adjacent statement about divorce). I believe he is being the most logical of all.

Fair enough. I tend to believe that if they preached what's actually in the bible it would drive people away. But in reality there are a lot of examples of people becoming even bigger fundamentalists when the text is more extreme.
 

MisterR

Member
Gonna go out on a limb here and say most conservatives are protestants who don't care. Only catholic president ever was Kennedy.

Oh they care. They wrap a ton of their bullshit in religion and that hate a major religious figure saying this stuff.
 

Red Hood

Banned
Come on, now. Be real. I'm not even a catholic, but heaven is supposed to be a concept of being rewarded for years of faith and dedication. Why would atheists, in this hypothetical scenario, be rewarded with heaven if they not only defied, but downright ridiculed, God?
 

Darksol

Member
“Sin, even for those who have no faith, exists when people disobey their conscience.”

Except "conscience" is not a tangible, objective thing, and differs from person to person.
 

erlim

yes, that talented of a member
Come on, now. Be real. I'm not even a catholic, but heaven is supposed to be a concept of being rewarded for years of faith and dedication. Why would atheists, in this hypothetical scenario, be rewarded with heaven if they not only defied, but downright ridiculed, God?

Maybe Pope Frank's conception God DGAF kinda like him and just loves everybody (except fiscal conservatives), who knows, maybe his idea of heaven isn't all ceramic angels playing trumpets. Maybe he's agnostic and not telling anybody. Who knows man, this Pope is so different. Also I think the Catholic idea behind heaven is good works, as in like soup kitchens and clothing drops and helping motorcyclists that fell off their motorcycle more than rah rah rah Jesus'ing.
 

ElTorro

I wanted to dominate the living room. Then I took an ESRAM in the knee.
Pope spreads the good word that GAF is going to heaven.

GAF is like


I am hesitant to applaud people for becoming a bit less batshit crazy than before. I'd like to think that non-insanity should be the default state of people, not something that is an accomplishment.

It's not really humanity's most impressive achievement to realize that it is a bad idea to tell people that they are going to suffer for eternity, simply for not believing on insufficient evidence that a volcano god sacrificed himself to himself, so that this blood sacrifice would override a cosmic rule he himself set up, which condemns everyone on earth to eternal suffering, just because an alleged ancient ancestor of all humans dared to acquire capabilities for ethical reasoning, unless you symbolically accept that blood sacrifice and eat the literal body of that god every Sunday morning.
 

Ogimachi

Member
I wouldn't surprise me if he actually believed that, but he didn't say it, and it's because that would've been quite openly heresy. Extra Ecclesiam nulla sallus is not something he can reject publicly.

: “You ask me if the God of the Christians forgives those who don’t believe and who don’t seek the faith. I start by saying – and this is the fundamental thing – that God’s mercy has no limits if you go to him[sic] with a sincere and contrite heart. The issue for those who do not believe in God is to obey their conscience.
This part is key: "if you go to Him"

He's saying you can be an atheist in life and still be saved but only if you accept God after death with a sincere heart. The only salvation is through Him, and Bergoglio did not say otherwise. This is a point of contention between "progressive" catholics (actually apostates) and traditional ones, but whether or not it's heresy it's up for interpretation. In my opinion, it is, and it's part of the reason I'm a sedevacantist.
Traditional catholics believe you cannot be saved if you reject the Church in life, knowing it is the only way to salvation. This means not only atheists cannot be saved, the same applies to protestants and followers of any other religion who, despite being aware of the Church (those who don't even know it exists cannot be condemned), reject the Church.
 

stolin

Member
Sorry.. I have no money to give you...

George Carlin - God loves you!


53042c7a4259c012330bf4d090018213.jpg
 

erlim

yes, that talented of a member
Why would conservatives love him? Most hard right conservatives are evangelicals.

They don't like him. The only person that likes him is Bernie Sanders. Both have been called socialists a lot by conservatives. He'll be on Bernie Sanders' presidential cabinet for suuuuuuure.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
I am hesitant to applaud people for becoming a bit less batshit crazy than before. I'd like to think that non-insanity should be the default state of people, not something that is an accomplishment.

It's not really humanity's most impressive achievement to realize that it is a bad idea to tell people that they are going to suffer for eternity, simply for not believing on insufficient evidence that a volcano god sacrificed himself to himself, so that this blood sacrifice would override a cosmic rule he himself set up, which condemns everyone on earth to eternal suffering, just because an alleged ancient ancestor of all humans dared to acquire capabilities for ethical reasoning, unless you symbolically accept that blood sacrifice and eat the literal body of that god every Sunday morning.

Easily the most euphoric post I've ever seen on GAF.
 

Aikidoka

Member
Hasn't he said this and backpedaled a couple of times now? He also seems very confused about homosexuality. Didn't he state that the "invention" of gay marriage is akin to nuclear weapons and something about the holocaust?
 

mantidor

Member
If something like heaven existed of course I would like to go there, some people are being silly here to be honest. "There is this place of awesome grace, beauty and eternal bliss" "eww I won't go because religion", It's kind of disappointing atheists can be so militant.

However even previous popes have said heaven (and hell for that matter) are more of a mental state than actual, physical places, people tend to forget how out there is catholicism compared to protestantism and other branches. I see catholicism accepting things like women as priests and even homosexuality way before any of the other doctrines, not that it will happen in our lifetime anyway, but catholicism its like that.

"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of shit; and I'd like to get as many of them out in the open as possible. What's it say about life, hmm? You gotta get together, tell yourself stories that violate every law of the universe just to get through the god damn day. Nah. What's that say about your reality".

Do you think all believers are like this? that they are only decent because they fear the consequences?
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
I am hesitant to applaud people for becoming a bit less batshit crazy than before. I'd like to think that non-insanity should be the default state of people, not something that is an accomplishment.

It's not really humanity's most impressive achievement to realize that it is a bad idea to tell people that they are going to suffer for eternity, simply for not believing on insufficient evidence that a volcano god sacrificed himself to himself, so that this blood sacrifice would override a cosmic rule he himself set up, which condemns everyone on earth to eternal suffering, just because an alleged ancient ancestor of all humans dared to acquire capabilities for ethical reasoning, unless you symbolically accept that blood sacrifice and eat the literal body of that god every Sunday morning.

*tips fedora
 

ElTorro

I wanted to dominate the living room. Then I took an ESRAM in the knee.
Easily the most euphoric post I've ever seen on GAF.

*tips fedora

It is not only the right wingers who are salty about this Pope.

I shall not mock the media's response to this pope when he finally abandons the catholic church's atrocious positions on contraceptives, especially considering the damage they cause in places like central Africa, or does similar things on that scope. Until then, this "euphoria" with every non-confrontational vague statement this pope makes seems superficial and naive to me.

Conversely, voicing a vague position on catholic doctrine is pretty much irrelevant for the addressed audience. "Hey you guys who don't believe in that stuff anyway, you can get the goodies at the end of the tunnel too!". What other response than mild mockery is there to expect?
 

Ostinatto

Member
So the pope has the power to change the rules of the religion at will? or it is a new interpretation of some bible passage?
 
I shall not mock the media's response to this pope when he finally abandons the catholic church's atrocious positions on contraceptives, especially considering the damage they cause in places like central Africa, or does similar things on that scope. Until then, this "euphoria" with every non-confrontational vague statement this pope makes seems superficial and naive to me.

Conversely, voicing a vague position on catholic doctrine is pretty much irrelevant for the addressed audience. "Hey you guys who don't believe in that stuff anyway, you can get the goodies at the end of the tunnel too!". What other response than mild mockery is there to expect?

1397847614945.gif
 
So the pope has the power to change the rules of the religion at will? or it is a new interpretation of some bible passage?
there are a few things they can fudge with because of Matthew 18:18-19 but they can't touch any revealed truths. so the pope can kinda do this? I guess it would rely on whether or not you've denied the holy ghost? but I don't have a super good grasp of ecclesiastical rulemaking procedures. the Catholic church has more obscure rules than a pokemon game.
 

entremet

Member
I've always preferred "Paradise" as best name for the afterlife, in the Christian worldview.

The term is used in the Bible synonymously with Heaven, although some interpretations consider it different places.

Sounds way better too.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
I don't even understand what an "internet atheist" as an insult means anymore. It's like.... If someone is not impressed or flattered that the pope says these things, they're an internet atheist, and the bad kind?
 

Ostinatto

Member
there are a few things they can fudge with because of Matthew 18:18-19 but they can't touch any revealed truths. so the pope can kinda do this? I guess it would rely on whether or not you've denied the holy ghost? but I don't have a super good grasp of ecclesiastical rulemaking procedures. the Catholic church has more obscure rules than a pokemon game.

I'm not familiar with Matthew 18:18-19 and the Holy Ghost, maybe is the guy who impregnated Mary?
 
I don't even understand what an "internet atheist" as an insult means anymore. It's like.... If someone is not impressed or flattered that the pope says these things, they're an internet atheist, and the bad kind?
to me it's the sort of atheist that delights in just sitting on believers simply for believing.

people should be treated with respect unless they're just complete fucking assholes. it's much more productive to attack bad ideas and intellectual dishonesty. which is there is plenty of from both theists and atheists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom