ParticleReality
Banned
MechDX said:Something else from the link that is chuckle worthy:
:lol
Sony likes money. HD-DVD makes money so might as well jump in and score a little profit.
MechDX said:Something else from the link that is chuckle worthy:
:lol
ManaByte said:I'm sure you'd love it if it looked like this:
VanMardigan said:So where do you go off on calling me obtuse? How do you justify making broad statements like growth trends and who was outselling who at what point and all that other junk????? You don't have the info, yet here you go making inferences about growth rates and such. And then calling me obtuse when I refute the claims, despite admitting you haven't seen the hardware weekly sales charts, and I have.
In your mind, you think that Toshiba had this HUGE LEAD at the beginning of the year, which has gradually decreased. This is the "growth trend" you speak about, yet there is no such trend. This false assumption is what's driven all the misinformation you have propagated. But here you are now admitting that you haven't seen the hardware sales numbers chart. And yet, I'm the one being ridiculed.
The HD hardware market is all about spikes caused by hardware pricing, which is normal for such a young market. You'll be shocked to know that Blu Ray players actually sold on par (and often above) HD DVD players until Toshiba dropped the price in APRIL. That's right, for the first 3 months of the year, it was Blu Ray that had the YTD standalone sales lead. After the price drops, Toshiba had a huge three month spike that secured their YTD sales lead. In July, after the cheaper Blu Ray player shipped, Blu Ray's sales spiked and up into August, it sold abotu 55/45 weekly.
You see any growth trends there? No, it's all about spikes in hardware caused by revised pricing. Guess what'll happen once Gen 3 HD DVD players arrive and Gen 2 drops in price? That's right, another sales spike for Toshiba. That's the only real thing that we can derive from these numbers, is that the market is young and new hardware or price drops can cause spikes.
I can remember 2 instances where Toshiba claimed 65% standalone sales. Then it was 61%, now it's 55%.
All of that was after the April price drop. Until that point, it was pretty much 50/50 with Blu Ray at one point even doing close to 60/40 per week.
After the price announcement, Toshiba rose as high as 80/20 for one week. Most recently (with the lower priced BD standalone), Blu Ray got up to 70/30 on one week, before the sales started smoothing out to their current 55/45 level (and that was up until mid August).
VanMardigan said:Exactly, and that difference is used to try to create a bigger price discrepancy than really exists.
eh, I got the first 2 on DVD. I'll probably wait till they put out a boxset when the 3rd one releases.StoOgE said:jason bourne says hi.
djkimothy said:Someone on highdef digest forums pointed out something funny.
150 million dollars gets you hidden behind Bumble Bee.
It reminds me of Monsters Inc. when the 1 eyed cyclops would have his face obscured on a magazine with a bar code or something.
Meier said:Are those based off of retail dollars or units? If it's units, for Heroes to do that well at $70$-100 is amazing.
VanMardigan said:When I posted:
You quoted me and posted:
So now you clarify.
Onix said:Look at Planet Earth
ManaByte said:
StoOgE said:planet earths sales on hddvd vs brd still confuses the shit out of me
Onix said:In what way ... that they were so high?
Xater said:You can play the DTS core don't worry.
VanMardigan said:Nice onyx,
nice way to cover your ass. So you have no info, present no evidence, yet I'm the obtuse one. :lol
If i gave a damn i would read back a few mere days of this thread where several hd dvd posters said "warner is going to care more about the standalone sales than how much they are selling because of the ps3" Or the more traditional one "hd dvd owns the standalone market and especially now that the price is so much cheaper they will continue to outsell blu-ray standalone"Chemo said:I have never read ANYTHING in this thread that indicated that the standalone player race was close. Now, though, we find out the Blu-ray players have started outselling HD DVD players and suddenly it was always a close race and we're retarded for pointing out that HD DVD has no ground left to turn to?
What sense does this make? This was the horn that HD DVD supporters were blowing for months. "Standalones are what counts, and HD DVD standalones are outselling Blu-ray standalones... standalones sell software, PS3s do not... price is what's going to win this war, not content or the PlayStation 3..." So what is the claim now? Are supporters going to back even further into a corner and cling to the last remaining bastion of hope: the fact that the HD DVD standalone player total install base is currently larger than Blu-ray players?
I also want to add that while I was taking a break from this thread, the claim that exclusive studios had "evened out" was made by quite a few people. Can I get a lol? Someone please tell me exactly when Universal plus Paramount minus Spielberg's films somehow became the equivalent of Sony plus Disney plus Fox. I guess I'm going to be waiting a long time for the answer to that question because I seriously doubt anyone is going to have the balls to admit that it's still heavily weighted toward Blu-ray content-wise.
So this is the question I pose to HD DVD supporters right now. What exactly are you going to do when Blu-ray standalone player install base, LTD, is larger than HD DVD's? (If it makes you feel more comfortable, feel free to read that "when" as an "if.") What will be the argument, what will be the defense? Are you going to admit defeat? Or will there be more excuses? I am not asking this in a condescending manner, I'm am genuinely inquiring. Are you guys going to suck it up and go Blu-ray, or are you going to quit high def media altogether because the "evil empire" Sony got its way for once?
-- Edit --
I would like to reiterate that I have already gone on record to say that I am in this for a one-format future, and that I chose Blu-ray because I felt that it had the best chance. If HD DVD made strides and became the big contender, I would switch in a heartbeat. So there's no reason to turn my question around on me -- I've already answered it multiple times.
Chemo said:I have never read ANYTHING in this thread that indicated that the standalone player race was close. Now, though, we find out the Blu-ray players have started outselling HD DVD players and suddenly it was always a close race and we're retarded for pointing out that HD DVD has no ground left to turn to?
What sense does this make? This was the horn that HD DVD supporters were blowing for months. "Standalones are what counts, and HD DVD standalones are outselling Blu-ray standalones... standalones sell software, PS3s do not... price is what's going to win this war, not content or the PlayStation 3..." So what is the claim now? Are supporters going to back even further into a corner and cling to the last remaining bastion of hope: the fact that the HD DVD standalone player total install base is currently larger than Blu-ray players?
I also want to add that while I was taking a break from this thread, the claim that exclusive studios had "evened out" was made by quite a few people. Can I get a lol? Someone please tell me exactly when Universal plus Paramount minus Spielberg's films somehow became the equivalent of Sony plus Disney plus Fox. I guess I'm going to be waiting a long time for the answer to that question because I seriously doubt anyone is going to have the balls to admit that it's still heavily weighted toward Blu-ray content-wise.
So this is the question I pose to HD DVD supporters right now. What exactly are you going to do when Blu-ray standalone player install base, LTD, is larger than HD DVD's? (If it makes you feel more comfortable, feel free to read that "when" as an "if.") What will be the argument, what will be the defense? Are you going to admit defeat? Or will there be more excuses? I am not asking this in a condescending manner, I'm am genuinely inquiring. Are you guys going to suck it up and go Blu-ray, or are you going to quit high def media altogether because the "evil empire" Sony got its way for once?
-- Edit --
I would like to reiterate that I have already gone on record to say that I am in this for a one-format future, and that I chose Blu-ray because I felt that it had the best chance. If HD DVD made strides and became the big contender, I would switch in a heartbeat. So there's no reason to turn my question around on me -- I've already answered it multiple times.
Oni Jazar said:Great post. I know there's an ignore list but there should be a buddy list. We're 100% on the same wavelength.
If you mean like watching paint dry, yes, it is.Jill Sandwich said:Is Barry Lyndon not coming out on Blu? That film is like watching a painting sometimes
Onix said:As far as not having evidence ... my recollection (along with everyone here) is that HD DVD standalone sales where higher at the beginning of the year ... and have generally trended downwards in margin over BD.
If you have info that shows this to be incorrect ... fine ... I would just like to see it since the consensus here is that everyone thought things played out differently.
It only seemed like a matter of time before Samsung would lower the MSRP of its upcoming BD-UP5000 Duo HD player to match LG's recently-announced price-cut for their dual format player.
Samsung now says its BD-UP5000 will hit stores sometime in the fourth quarter at a $999 street price -- down $50 from its previously announced MSRP of $1,049.
The price drop is the latest in a series of tit for tat pricing moves between Samsung and LG, who are both marketing dual-format players for the upcoming holiday season.
Samsung made the first move in July, when it announced that its BDP-UP5000 would hit the market priced at $1,049 -- $150 less than LG's BH100 (which had been priced at $1,199 since its launch earlier this year). LG responded in August by announcing its own $200 price drop for the BH100, and now things have come circle with Samsung matching LG's $999 price.
Earlier this week, LG announced a 2nd-Gen dual format player -- the BH200 -- which also carries the $999 pricetag.
Of course, even at $999, all three players remain more expensive than buying two separate standalone players (Toshiba's HD-A2 and Sony's BDP-S300 currently retail at a combined cost of $898), but with the holidays just around the corner, perhaps yet another dual-format player price drop is in our future. Stay tuned...
also want to add that while I was taking a break from this thread, the claim that exclusive studios had "evened out" was made by quite a few people. Can I get a lol? Someone please tell me exactly when Universal plus Paramount minus Spielberg's films somehow became the equivalent of Sony plus Disney plus Fox. I guess I'm going to be waiting a long time for the answer to that question because I seriously doubt anyone is going to have the balls to admit that it's still heavily weighted toward Blu-ray content-wise
VanMardigan said:I see, so you had no evidence, you were going on recollection, yet when I put forward my points, I was being obtuse because it didn't jive with whatever inference you were making although you never had any hard data?
I guess that's as close as I'll get to you plain admitting that you shouldn't have talked smack because you really didn't have anything to go on except hearsay.
As for the chart, FFobsessed had posted it a few pages back (it was a weekly hardware Sony chart from cedia), and it was even discussed then, when I corrected FF because he didn't realize it was a weekly chart, not a SI chart. I believe the chart was eventually pulled, leaving the software chart. Either way, I saved it to my pc and I'll upload it, perhaps, if I damn well feel like. After all, if you can debate with me and berate me for like 5 pages without any damn data to back up your arguments, what difference does it make.
As far as content, I already told you what it shows. And as far as the prevailing thought here that it doesn't matter what the data was, it just matters what we THOUGHT at the time, I say LOL to that. Even if you THOUGHT BR standalones were trending upward all year while HD DVD was trending downward all year, and argued that for months on end, it doesn't make a lick of difference if it wasn't true.
MechDX said:In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
Universal keeps pumping movies out and Paramount is showing they will do the same. Right now Sony and to a lesser extent, Warner, are providing all the BR heavy hitters. Other than the two Pirate movies of course.
Onix said:You may want to look at the release list of Fox movies for the rest of the year
Uhh? Fox just announced 29 Blu-ray releases for Q4 2007.MechDX said:In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
Universal keeps pumping movies out and Paramount is showing they will do the same. Right now Sony and to a lesser extent, Warner, are providing all the BR heavy hitters. Other than the two Pirate movies of course.
Oni Jazar said:Great post. I know there's an ignore list but there should be a buddy list. We're 100% on the same wavelength.
Onix said:You may want to look at the release list of Fox movies for the rest of the year
MechDX said:In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
Universal keeps pumping movies out and Paramount is showing they will do the same. Right now Sony and to a lesser extent, Warner, are providing all the BR heavy hitters. Other than the two Pirate movies of course.
WULFER said:You may want to check out the price for those Fox movies. They did magically drop in price either. :lol
Chemo said:Uhh? Fox just announced 29 Blu-ray releases for Q4 2007.
And dude. Pirates is a Disney property.
In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
MechDX said:In honestly because Fox promised a huge patch of movies a year ago and how many have surfaced? Same with Disney. Other than the Pirates movies and Xmen 3 what else have they released?
Universal keeps pumping movies out and Paramount is showing they will do the same. Right now Sony and to a lesser extent, Warner, are providing all the BR heavy hitters. Other than the two Pirate movies of course.
FFObsessed said:Are you guys arguing about this graph?
Sorry I wasn't paying attention to what you were discussing.
WULFER said:You may want to check out the price for those Fox movies. They did magically drop in price either. :lol
If you are correct and prove it ... I'll be more than happy to admit it ... as will everyone else here who seems to recall the same thing.
VanMardigan said:If it's the weekly hardware chart that you posted earlier in the thread........then yep. That's the one that onyx now says "mysteriously" disappeared. :lol
Wrong again, uh onyx, you're making it a habit.
As for the chart, FFobsessed had posted it a few pages back (it was a weekly hardware Sony chart from cedia), and it was even discussed then, when I corrected FF because he didn't realize it was a weekly chart, not a SI chart. I believe the chart was eventually pulled, leaving the software chart. Either way, I saved it to my pc and I'll upload it, perhaps, if I damn well feel like. After all, if you can debate with me and berate me for like 5 pages without any damn data to back up your arguments, what difference does it make.
Onix said:What in the hell are you talking about.
YOU'RE THE ONE THAT TOLD ME IT WAS PULLED
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
And again ... somehow I'm the one berating you? You are one of the most condescending posters here. At least most other posters that are equally condescending can take a punch as well
VanMardigan said:I even went to church and came back. It's going to get a lot more fun, once we can cut through the spin on both sides with ACTUAL SALES.
VanMardigan said:so pulled all of a sudden equals "mysteriously disappeared"????? :lol :lol :lol
I'll upload it, perhaps, if I damn well feel like. After all, if you can debate with me and berate me for like 5 pages without any damn data to back up your arguments, what difference does it make.
Man up, I posted the damn chart. If you give me time, I think I can produce the actual unit sales. Now wouldn't THAT be awesome??