RaidenZR said:Regardless of what player Wal-Mart is backing, they don't carry shit in terms of software selection for EITHER format. So the thrifty Wal-Mart shopper is going to mosey on into the movie aisle with player under their arm and find the latest from Ice Cube and Norbit.
VanMardigan said:And Acer makes an HD DVD laptop. How deep is this rabbit hole????
So you don't think that would be big news?
jjasper said:They don't have to give me money I will take one of the Halo 3 moneyhat review score bags please.
newsguy said:My boss was telling me about this deal today. Is it true that the A2 is only 720p or 1080i? Sorry, I haven't followed HD DVD much since I got BR, but for transformers this is awesome.
jjasper said:The Walmart crowd is going to be pissed when they get home and hook up their new fancy player and it looks just like a DVD.
Does the 100$ hd-dvd player upscale regular dvds?
And also does hollywood video rent hd-dvds? Since i believe blockbuster is just blueray.
Chumly said:Does the 100$ hd-dvd player upscale regular dvds?
Chumly said:And also does hollywood video rent hd-dvds? Since i believe blockbuster is just blueray.
VanMardigan said:Then, when they sell it back and buy a Ps3 for Blu Ray...............it looks like a dvd as well!!!
See what I did there??
they both come with composite cables, one cost 4 times as much
Chumly said:Ok so i feel retarded asking all these questiosn but so
Does the 100$ hd-dvd player upscale regular dvds?
And also does hollywood video rent hd-dvds? Since i believe blockbuster is just blueray.
VanMardigan said:Raiden, fine, my bad. But.......what WAS your point?
RaidenZR said:That I wish Wal-Mart would stock anicermoderately acceptable selection of HD-era movies, since I live 5 minutes walking distance from one.
Chumly said:lol one more question am I going to need any extra cables to hook it up?
Chumly said:lol one more question am I going to need any extra cables to hook it up?
Kolgar said:A2 does upscale and it does so quite nicely. I've heard people say it's about equivalent to PS3 in upscaling (and the PS3 is supposedly very good). In my own experience, I've found the upscaling of the A2 to be at least as good as the Sony upscaling player I bought holiday 2006. I currently use my A2 when watching standard DVDs as it does a good job and I'd prefer to save the PS3 for games and Blu-ray movies. Be aware that the more expensive Toshibas (A20, XA2) do contain better upscaling hardware, but as I said, they're more expensive.
I don't think Hollywood rents HD DVDs but you'll want to visit their website or a local store to be sure.
I have HDMI ports so how much extra would good/decent cables for that cost.jjasper said:Yes component or HDMI
Chumly said:I have HDMI ports so how much extra would good/decent cables for that cost.
OokieSpookie said:Wow...
No.
Chumly, google Toshiba A2 review and go from there.
You will not get an honest answer in here.
Make your own decision.
maharg said:Oh ffs. Have you ever actually watched SD content on a laptop monitor? Their native resolution is very often *higher* than even the highest end TVs. Not to mention that if you're watching it on a laptop screen, you're watching it close, and imperfections will be glaring.
Not saying I think a lot of people will buy HD-DVDs (or BR -- remember Apple being all gung ho about bluray? I remember some OMG APPLE AND DELL ARE ON BOARD zaniness in this thread) for their laptops, but to dismiss the very concept as ridiculous is just plain silly.
I've already said I don't care which one wins as long as one wins.Scottlarock said:and what if it does, what are you blu-ray supporters going to say?
Kolgar said:So you're calling me dishonest?
I'm relaying information based on both my personal experience and what I've heard. Personally, when I spent a half hour checking out the PS3's upscaling capabilities, I was not blown away. It looked good... but I honestly didn't give it a rigorous examination.
Perhaps you'd like to share YOUR experience? Maybe I should be using MY PS3 to watch standard DVDs. What do you think?
Kolgar said:So you're calling me dishonest?
I'm relaying information based on both my personal experience and what I've heard. Personally, when I spent a half hour checking out the PS3's upscaling capabilities, I was not blown away. It looked good... but I honestly didn't give it a rigorous examination.
Perhaps you'd like to share YOUR experience? Maybe I should be using MY PS3 to watch standard DVDs. What do you think?
OokieSpookie said:I can understand the personal experience thing, and if I misjudged your intentions with the post I do apologize.
The PS3 used to have no upscaling but now it is considered one of the better upscalers out there (something to do with chip usage).
I know that some of the higher end toshiba's have the newer Reon chip which is supposed to be exceptional at upscaling, unfortunately the A2 was left without it.
Honestly though I think it is moot since without HDMI nothing really upscales, so hopefully people read the manual a bit so they can get the most out of their purchase.
Kolgar said:Yeah, well, shit, I'm Googling around and seeing things that suggest the PS3's upscaling is more comparable to an XA2 or something. So, cool. Apologies if I mis-spoke, I'll go back and edit that out of my post.
Sometimes, guys, what we need to do more of here is HELP each other rather than cockpunch each other, because this stuff can sometimes be complicated and none of us has all the answers.
Maxwell House said:BTW, I have seen the Wal-Mart hd-dvd TV commercial like 5 times tonight. Wal-Mart seems to be pushing this hard.
I'm sure its because their prices will vary over the holiday season, and they plan to run the commercials throughout. They don't want it to be locked into one specific price.Zoe said:Yet none of them mention the model or price. Do they really expect to appeal to the masses by forcing them to go to the website?
Maxwell House said:I'm sure its because their prices will vary over the holiday season, and they plan to run the commercials throughout. They don't want it to be locked into one specific price.
..............................................Chemo said:I've already said I don't care which one wins as long as one wins.
I guess this time around no one has an answer. No surprise there, I guess.
Zoe said:There are two portions to the commercial though, which is pretty common. One which is expected to last indefinitely, and another that references the exact sale. They should have made the sale portion about the player if they really wanted to maximize it, but instead they're pushing the laptop.
What? What the fuck is your problem?Scottlarock said:..............................................
edit:
..............................................
VanMardigan said:This is not a proper interpretation of the data, and I've even posted it here. Furthermore, BR is once again losing ground on the standalone battle. After tomorrow, there will be no more battle in that regard. HD DVD will walk out of this year with the standalone crown, so the only question is whether it will have an effect on software sales. Or, at least enough of an uptake to convince Warner to come back to its HD DVD only roots.
Also, I'm really proud that nobody took the Bill Hunt bait. I know he's already lost most of his credibility, but now whatever little was left of it was shredded. I swear he's a neogaf poster, I just haven't figured out which.
And is that cnbc article suggesting that Wal Mart may have an HD DVD exclusivity announcement on the way? Just look at the excitement in this thread from folks who've never posted here, and the level of vitriol from some BR folks, and you just KNOW this is big.
...............................Snah said:The standalone battle is a battle for irrelevancy when the PS3 is essentially:
1. The best blu-ray player on the market.
2. The cheapest blu-ray player on the market.
'Attach rate' is an irrelevant figure. Total software being sold is the best indicator of strength.
Also, Bill Hunt's article was 100% spot on, and many people agree with his position.
Snah said:I'm glad you feel that way, and that's fine, I just beg to differ. I do not want to have to bother with multiple players and multiple formats when I know that blu-ray is going to win. I would absolutely hate to have to convert all of my previously purchased HD discs into Blu-Ray.
Snah said:Also, Bill Hunt's article was 100% spot on, and many people agree with his position.
okay quicklySnah said:The standalone battle is a battle for irrelevancy when the PS3 is essentially:
1. The best blu-ray player on the market.
2. The cheapest blu-ray player on the market.
'Attach rate' is an irrelevant figure. Total software being sold is the best indicator of strength.
Also, Bill Hunt's article was 100% spot on, and many people agree with his position.
beermonkey@tehbias said:It doesn't matter. You won't have to convert your previous discs, just buy a combo player. Hell, SACD and DVD-A were nothing in terms of market penetration compared to BD and HD-DVD, and it's plenty easy to buy a player that handles both.
Bill Hunt is smart enough to own both players so he can play any high-def movie! :lol :lol :lol If he thinks I should own only BD, he's a goddamn hypocrite.
Snah said:The standalone battle is a battle for irrelevancy when the PS3 is essentially:
1. The best blu-ray player on the market.
Scottlarock said:okay quickly
1. LOL
2. sad/ 399 vs 98
3. ... whatever makes you look good.
favouriteflavour said:Still? WTF? Even Sony's other players are worse? Thats just dumb Sony.
Snah said:Err...that's kind of a big deal....and may never even become viable.
...Scottlarock said:...............................