OokieSpookie said:Player price does not mean anything in the scheme of things or HD would have run away with it long ago, or at least won one week.
The player prices will be at that price in no time, considering you can already get players for 279 or so and when 1.1s hit the market in numbers they will reach that price quickly.
That still will not do a damned thing if Warner does not switch.
If someone is so anal to demand a player that cheap then they sure as hell are not going to run out to buy movies for 20-30 dollars every week.
279 for a 2 year old player no thank you. It is like saying someone can get an A1 for 149 I would tell them not to. Most people are not going to spend 399+ on a player and that is what you have to spend to get a good blu player. I mentioned media cost as a reason why adoption has been slower. The war is 3rd or 4th on my list of reasons why HD media has not caught on and won't any time soon. The war will fix all those issue except people buying HD TVs because of competition. I said it before neither format is ready for the prime time right now. Maybe 4th gen players will be bulletproof that require no firmware upgrades and will be sub 200 dollars.
I am anal about player prices because of the movie prices. If I am going to spend 20-30 dollars on a movie it has to work on more than 1 tv in the house. So I needed to buy 2 players now and later this year a 3rd player. It would cost me 800+ dollars to purchase 2 blu players when I could get 2 hd-dvd players for less than half that. That 400 dollar savings buys a ton of media. I did the same thing when I went from VHS to DVD waited for players to get sub 300 and buy 2 and a 3rd later. I don't want to purchase media 2x that is a complete waste of money.