Opus Angelorum
Member
In all honesty despite the divisions, each 'side' wanted High Definition to be the victor.
chubigans said:Me too. Now what do I do with all this popcorn?
neptunes said:I hope they can produce some cheap standalone Blu-ray players now. (i.e. $100-$150 cheap)
I can't see myself buying one unless it's in that price range.
Opus Angelorum said:In all honesty despite the divisions, each 'side' wanted High Definition to be the victor.
YYZ said:DVD is digital versatile disc I think.
No one says BD IRL, people say Blu-Ray. DVD is still loner to say than Blu-Ray so it works out well.
DVD was marketed as "D-V-D", Blu-Ray was marketed as "Blu-Ray" and that's they way it will stay.
HD-DVD is a fitting, but not as marketable.
Why are we talking about this? Because it's GAF and everyone here has their strange nitpicks.
VanMardigan said:This is my biggest problem right now. I really wish that a BD CE would just manufacture a 720p/1080i player (1.1 at least) and sell it for $199. I want to continue building my collection (on Blu now), but I really need another player for my 1080i CRT set.
jmdajr said:wow MS thanks for putting up a fight!
PATHETIC!
jmdajr said:wow MS thanks for putting up a fight!
PATHETIC!
Xeke said:Ugh. Blu-ray sounds so stupid.
yes, such a scenario would be considered unfair and would slow down the format's adoption rate.Opus Angelorum said:Would it be unfair to suggest that Sony may wish to keep standalone players at a higher price initially to aid the marketing of the PS3 ?
_leech_ said:Eat it while watching Blu-ray movies.
Darobga said:
avaya said:kjack of Sigma Designs already said that there will be a Chinese Blu-ray standalone at CES this year.
OokieSpookie said:
VanMardigan said:I'm sitting here figuring out the best way for me to unload those as well. Fortunately, I don't have a ton of Warner HD DVD's. Happy Feet and 16 Blocks are already available on Blu, so I'd like to sell those first. Matrix and Batman Begins I might as well wait until I know their release date on Blu (which will be announced in a few days). 300 I think I'll hold on to until Warner re-releases it on Blu with the HD DVD stuff. That's it. Plus I have Planet Earth which is also available on Blu. I'll definitely look to switch that into Blu.
Flek said:
hey, you got a tag!Sir Fragula said:Radio was.
Meh, I don't think morality has anything to do with something so trivial.
:lolmichaeld said:
SRG01 said:So... after the initial euphoria, here's the question: a lot of people were speculating that they would not announce until after CES or the conference call in February. Why so early?
zesty said:So when do I get Batman on BRD?
Mmmkay said:You see this is what I never really got with the Paramount/Dreamworks deal, it was an 'effective immediately' announcement, whereas this Warner one has a more conscientious lead time. Is this likely because Warner has an existing contractual obligation to HD DVD, or does it emphasise how much of an 11th hour saver the Para/DW one was for them?
DoctorWho said:Just ordered some Blu-Ray movies in celebration!
DoctorWho said:Just ordered some Blu-Ray movies in celebration!
Me tooDoctorWho said:Just ordered some Blu-Ray movies in celebration!
Yeah, noticed that... thought the linked post was fairly reasonable.bune duggy said:hey, you got a tag!
Taping? No. I used to listen to a lot of [BBC] Radio 2. Owning music wasn't really a priority for me. I wasn't - and indeed I'm still not - really into the music industry all much. I've got a 10gb collection and half of that's stuff I never listen to.so what you're saying is that instead of buying a CD you've been taping all your music off a radio since 1985? and ever since digital downloads became a reality that's the way you've been procuring your music?
Sir Fragula said:Why the question marks? I don't buy Sony products and if this is all true then I've no desire to invest any money in to a format of theirs. I'll wait until the next generation of storage media.
Turns out it is true. Alas, can't win them all.
Not sure if it's been brought up, but it's disgusting that they've waited until after the huge holiday buying season to make an announcement like this. Many people have bought into the HD DVD format during this time. If they would have made the announcement before this time they could have maximized Blu-ray sales and minimized fallout from new HD DVD adopters. It's a very ****ty situation that they could have handled in a much better way.
Chiggs said:If someone wants to read some retarded comments (i.e; people downplaying the news, DD future, etc, etc), then look no further:
http://www.dailytech.com/Warner+Bros+to+Become+Bluray+Exclusive/article10233.htm
From what I've gathered, the Dailytech folks hates Sony quite a bit. No huge meltdowns, but the bitterness is there.
Opus Angelorum said:http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee137/aranathos/DonVito.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]
You do know that guy is a convincted pedo now, right?
Absinthe said:I tend to agree with this guy from another board:
I agree. I'm glad that an apparent victor is emerging, but they handled this in a completely shitty way. There were many, many HD DVD adopters that probably picked one up before Christmas and they just got toasted. They should have just announced this earlier and maximized Blu-Ray profits and sales.
Madman said:You do know that guy is a convincted pedo now, right?
xS1TH L0RDx said:how could you downlplay the importance of one of, if not THE best studio EVAR going blu-exclusives.
This is not a win for Bluray, just a minor loss for HD-DVD. Unless a biggie like Paramount does a flip flop (I hope so), this will end with everyone owning dual format players, simple as that.
indeed.Sir Fragula said:Yeah, noticed that... thought the linked post was fairly reasonable.
huh.Taping? No. I used to listen to a lot of [BBC] Radio 2. Owning music wasn't really a priority for me. I wasn't - and indeed I'm still not - really into the music industry all much. I've got a 10gb collection and half of that's stuff I never listen to.