Opus Angelorum
Member
Zaptruder said:Yeah it is. I typed it out and paused for a moment... and realised how much of a waste it would be.
200 bucks. for a farkin BD rom. Not even a writer man.
Not worth it.
Zaptruder said:Yeah it is. I typed it out and paused for a moment... and realised how much of a waste it would be.
200 bucks. for a farkin BD rom. Not even a writer man.
mrklaw said:see, this I don't get. Surely you have the same issue when viewing at the cinema? Whats suddenly changed?
DoctorWho said:Does anyone have a link to that site that lists the quality of all blu-ray discs?
DoctorWho said:Does anyone have a link to that site that lists the quality of all blu-ray discs?
Forsete said:I doubt that... Paying off Paramount, loss on each HD-DVD player, deals back and forth. It'll be nice to see their financials for once. If DVD-royalties covers that much, then Sony must be in heaven when Blu-Ray starts to sell by the truckload.
Speaking of PC-drives, are there any external drives out yet? Speaking Blu-Ray drives.
Warm Machine said:Yeah, thats the whole point of the war, finding royalty heaven. Toshiba is a massive company with an incredible bankroll. The HD-DVD loss is probably nothing in the grand scheme. Hell, why do you think every year Sony invents another format for something?
Nicodimas said:Sony's been losing money from the ps3 for a long time now:
http://blog.wired.com/games/2007/10/sony-playstatio.html
This quater will be there first one of proft as they finally got the cost down..Sony needed blu-ray to suceed.
Toshiba took far less of a loss because the infrastucture already existed for Hd-dvd
http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/29/toshiba-2q-earnings-markets-equity-cx_vk_1029markets9.html
Zaptruder said:Yeah it is. I typed it out and paused for a moment... and realised how much of a waste it would be.
200 bucks. for a farkin BD rom. Not even a writer man.
Nicodimas said:Sony's been losing money from the ps3 for a long time now:
http://blog.wired.com/games/2007/10/sony-playstatio.html
This quater will be there first one of proft as they finally got the cost down..Sony needed blu-ray to suceed.
Toshiba took far less of a loss because the infrastucture already existed for Hd-dvd
http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/29/toshiba-2q-earnings-markets-equity-cx_vk_1029markets9.html
Toshiba has other areas to help cover the losses but not even close to the resources as Sony and others.
Raw64life said:
Nicodimas said:Ookie try to prove your point that Sony has more areas to fall back on then Toshiba. Look at how much sony has lost on the ps3 up to this point. Basically try to prove what you just said go out and read.
Suikoguy said:First $199 BD Burner will be mine!
(Along with a Sony Handycam HDR-SR7 60GB Hard Drive Camcorder once it comes down in price a bit more)
StoOgE said:ookie, toshiba didnt pay for the walmart sale. it would be nice if you didnt keep repeating the same fud after its been disproven.
Nicodimas said:Ookie try to prove your point that Sony has more areas to fall back on then Toshiba. Look at how much sony has lost on the ps3 up to this point. Basically try to prove what you just said go out and read.
OokieSpookie said:I do not care if the Pope himself came down in his funny little car and told me , I still will never believe that Walmart ate $100 per A2 sold.
It is not even a remote possibility.
Nicodimas said:Ookie try to prove your point that Sony has more areas to fall back on then Toshiba. Look at how much sony has lost on the ps3 up to this point. Basically try to prove what you just said go out and read.
Zaptruder said:Anyone think its worthwhile buying a new BD drive along with a new PC? (already paid for new PC; just waiting on shipping).
About $200 USD... er... I think I'll wait for the prices to drop.
The Main Event said:HD DVD:
http://www.hddvdboxsets.com/
Blu-ray:
http://www.blu-rayboxsets.com/
They have amazing prices on some stuff. Shipping to Canada is extremely expensive though.
Marty Chinn said:Whoa, how legit are those sites?
Hi everyone,
This is John from HDDVDboxsets.com - I found this thread after you crashed my server - LOL.
After transferring the domain to my main server, we're back up and can handle the Slick Deal onslaught.
Just to answer the question on here - the site basically scours all of Amazon's 3rd party affiliates to find the best deals at the moment - I have a 24/7 connection with Amazon's affiliates to provide up-to-the-second data. It's more of a service site than a sales site, as all sales are processed through Amazon.
Hope this clears up the question of what the site does - just compiles everything for you so the best deals are presented to you.
Another + to shopping with the site is that we stand by all orders - meaning if you have trouble with a 3rd party merchant, we will step in and help you resolve the issue until you either receive a full refund or get what you purchased - so far out of over 3,000 orders we've only had 6 issues and each one has been resolved.
I also run Blu-RayBoxsets.com - which does the same from Blu-Rays. I should say *I* run Blu-Ray and my partner Travis runs HD DVD (we sort of have a bet going on which is the better format/successful site) - but I still have love for you HD DVD guys - can't we all just get along?
I want to thank you for visiting and testing the capacity of my servers! - have a great weekend everyone.
Yes, but I made that decision before Warner made any announcement. By decision was based on my experience with the HD-DVD audience and the abuse I took in the AVS Forum. It is obvious they do not appreciate our efforts to raise the bar ... and in all honesty, they were not very nice about it .... so we are excluding HD-DVD with respect to our future releases.
Dot50Cal said:RB Films Drops HD-DVD Support because of HD-DVD AVS Forum posters (yes, seriously)
http://formatwarcentral.com/index.php/2008/01/20/rb-films-to-exclude-hd-dvd-for-future-releases/
:lol :lol :lol
Dot50Cal said:RB Films Drops HD-DVD Support because of HD-DVD AVS Forum posters (yes, seriously)
http://formatwarcentral.com/index.php/2008/01/20/rb-films-to-exclude-hd-dvd-for-future-releases/
:lol :lol :lol
If I recall this guy did get lam-basted on the AVS boards. He was adimant about doing two separate encodes of his films to maximize their bitrate on both platforms. Lots of the HD-DVD fans took offense at him saying that Blu-ray offered more, and thus looked better.
Dot50Cal said:RB Films Drops HD-DVD Support because of HD-DVD AVS Forum posters (yes, seriously)
http://formatwarcentral.com/index.php/2008/01/20/rb-films-to-exclude-hd-dvd-for-future-releases/
:lol :lol :lol
If I recall this guy did get lam-basted on the AVS boards. He was adimant about doing two separate encodes of his films to maximize their bitrate on both platforms. Lots of the HD-DVD fans took offense at him saying that Blu-ray offered more, and thus looked better.
polyh3dron said:This is fucking gold... Over at HDD some guys are still saying that this guy was just a pompous prick and good riddance and all that.
polyh3dron said:This is fucking gold... Over at HDD some guys are still saying that this guy was just a pompous prick and good riddance and all that.
Dot50Cal said:He got into arguments because he was very vocal that he thought Blu-ray offered a better experience due to the bitrates it was able to hit compared to HD DVD. I stopped visiting AVS so I'm not sure if he turned into a basket case or not.
A link to a thread of his, where he trys to explain how much he cares about quality:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=924286&highlight=rbfilms
Those A2 players that Wal-Mart sold for cheap didn't do 1080p. right?Dot50Cal said:He got into arguments because he was very vocal that he thought Blu-ray offered a better experience due to the bitrates it was able to hit compared to HD DVD. I stopped visiting AVS so I'm not sure if he turned into a basket case or not.
A link to a thread of his, where he trys to explain how much he cares about quality:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=924286&highlight=rbfilms
RDJam (HDNOW) trolled him :lol
One other thing, I think this guy labeled one of his releases as 1080i on HD-DVD, but it was infact 1080p. He did so because there were no HD-DVD players on the market that outputted 1080p :lol
M3wThr33 said:Those A2 players that Wal-Mart sold for cheap didn't do 1080p. right?
Dot50Cal said:Right, only 1080i.
OokieSpookie said:1080p DOESN'T MATTER, IT IS BLU FUD!!!
_leech_ said:
markom58 said:Nice 2 week long vacation and I havent kept up. Whats the word on Universal and Paramount?
M3wThr33 said:Those A2 players that Wal-Mart sold for cheap didn't do 1080p. right?
Cosmic Bus said:There are millions of 720p/1080i HDTVs out there, and not releasing a lower-priced line of 1080i players is one of the biggest mistakes the Blu-Ray camp is making. Instead, there will be plenty of people (myself included) who are going to be waiting for a year... two years? for a decently priced stand-alone that isn't an outmoded doorstop.
Cosmic Bus said:There are millions of 720p/1080i HDTVs out there, and not releasing a lower-priced line of 1080i players is one of the biggest mistakes the Blu-Ray camp is making. Instead, there will be plenty of people (myself included) who are going to be waiting for a year... two years? for a decently priced stand-alone that isn't an outmoded doorstop.
teiresias said:You're complaining about doorstops yet I bet you bought an HD-DVD player.