Ponn01 said:
Well, if you insist lack of ability to download ringtones and trailers a doorstop but lack of 1080p support in a HD player not so much then thats your right to say so. I guess. Thumbs up for you.
Except that it isn't just the inability to access certain features; players (including the PS3) that aren't up to snuff, profile-wise, can have problems simply playing newer discs, freezing or looping at menus, limiting or even disabling use of even the most basic functions like fast-forwarding or pausing. I've seen this first-hand. And if your player can't be upgraded to the newest specs, then what? Buy a new player? Classy.
Obviously, 1080p versus 1080i has absolutely nothing to do with being able to play a disc, and having a slightly lesser video output hardly makes something useless, particularly for those of us without monstrously large sets where the difference is virtually indistinguishable. If dropping that progressive output for a budget line of (still fully-functional) players helps to get prices into a more accessable range for many consumers, I can't see why Sony and/or the Blu camp hasn't taken the opportunity.
Snah said:
Then don't be an idiot consumer and get a PS3 and just STFU, seriously.
As I said, I've been waiting for prices to go
down and I'd like to believe a basic movie-only unit will be less expensive sooner than the PS3. I'd much prefer a low-cost, functional stand-alone, mainly because the PS3 offers more hardware than I need or want (not a gamer anymore, despite having attempted to get back into it a few times), but also for - admittedly less important - aesthetic reasons and little annoyances, like having to buy a remote seperately.
Also, really nice with the "idiot consumer" comment, as if it's their fault these obsolete players are still (or were ever) being sold.