This guy. Is anyone hammering him for this?
You should read the article. There is a needle exchange now, he flipped on his previous position. His past beliefs are despicable, but he is at the very least now doing the right thing.
It all makes sense once you realize drug addicts aren't actually people
That's kinda true, but at the same time many states have what's called drug court where instead of incarceration you complete a program similar to what you suggest.Those are called prisons and they aren't working. We need treatment facilities that offer treatment as well as mental health assistance.
maybe if we ignore the problem it will go away.
You jest, but we treat addiction in this country like a crime. A serious one at that. It's probably the least humane way to deal with the issue. Yet we still have people saying things like, "my tax dollars should go to locking these people up" because they're too short sighted and reactionary to see past their own nose.
You should read the article. There is a needle exchange now, he flipped on his previous position. His past beliefs are despicable, but he is at the very least now doing the right thing.
Indiana sounds like a backwards cesspool between this and the religious freedom bill.
Rural areas are overrepresented in the US Government, slows progress down enormously.Wasn't needle exchange looked down upon during the Reagan years too? Didn't work out so hot for the USA. While in the UK needle exchange was promoted and HIV spread started to come under control.
Yeah spend my tax dollars to give junkies clean needles
Not really disagreeing with you but at the same time as I mentioned in a previous post states (perhaps all of them) have separate program for drug offenses which entails rehab,no jail time, and in in the states that aren't backwards... a clean record.You jest, but we treat addiction in this country like a crime. A serious one at that. It's probably the least humane way to deal with the issue. Yet we still have people saying things like, "my tax dollars should go to locking these people up" because they're too short sighted and reactionary to see past their own nose.
Such an incredibly short-sighted and nonsensical outlook.Yeah spend my tax dollars to give junkies clean needles
I'd rather you spend my tax dollars on a place to house them where they won't be able to do drugs
That's kinda true, but at the same time many states have what's called drug court where instead of incarceration you complete a program similar to what you suggest.
when will this guy run for national office
He was a congressman for 12 years.
"With additional state resources and new tools provided by this emergency declaration, I am confident that together we will stop this HIV outbreak in its tracks."
Indiana sounds like a backwards cesspool between this and the religious freedom bill.
Wait, was this opposition a recent thing? It says it started in January the outbreak so unless it was a recent change, I'm not seeing the connection.
Hmm, that's not logical. Was it a recent change that didn't allow this? Because if not, they're not linked.Was opposed to the program > outbreak begins > changes mind.
Hmm, that's not logical. Was it a recent change that didn't allow this? Because if not, they're not linked.
When did he start opposing it then? That's literally what I'm asking. I don't see it in the articleHow would any other sequence of events make more sense?
He opposed it before he reversed his decision
He reversed his decision after the breakout.
The breakout did not happen before he opposed it, because it was before this year that he opposed it and the breakout happened this year.
Well, fault him for his past, but it sounds like Pence is doing that now. So better late than never? He could have doubled down on the dumb here.I'm so fucking sick of ideology over pragmatism.
Do what works.
When did he start opposing it then? That's literally what I'm asking. I don't see it in the article
Then the thread title is bullshit, it didn't cause this outbreak to occur.It's a state law, I can't find any info on when it was passed or even what law bans it.
Then the thread title is bullshit, it didn't cause this outbreak to occur.
Pence, a Republican, said officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who arrived in the county Monday said it would be medically appropriate to authorize some type of needle-exchange program to help stem the infections.
Such programs are illegal in Indiana, and Pence has opposed needle exchanges as part of drug-control efforts. But his order allows Scott County officials to request state approval for a limited, short-term program.
Its something Pence has a long record of opposing as an anti drug policy.
If the legislature sent me a broad based needle exchange bill, I would veto it, he said. I dont believe that effective anti drug policy involves handing out paraphernalia to drug users by government officials. I reject that.
That still doesn't prove the thread title isn't bullshit. This still doesn't prove he started it either like you keep suggesting.Don't be so sure. Here's a local news outlet that has more info about the law:
http://wlfi.com/2015/03/26/indiana-allows-needle-exchange-program-to-stem-hiv-outbreak/
Its his policy. He was governor since 2013.
http://wishtv.com/2015/03/26/pence-declares-public-health-emergency-amid-hiv-outbreak/
That still doesn't prove the thread title isn't bullshit. This still doesn't prove he started it either like you keep suggesting.
1. Governor Pence has a long-standing opposition to needle-exchange program.
2. HIV Outbreak Occurs after #1.
I don't know what is bullshit about the thread title. I don't think anyone is saying Mike Pence is going around sticking people with HIV needles, but its not like his policy helped curtail the outbreak since we know that needle-exchange programs tamp down outbreaks.
its like being opposed to getting a flu shot, you get the flu, then blame it not on you getting the flu shot but the fact that it would have happened anyway.
there are things you can do to prevent things like this, and if you don't do it you are being irresponsible, or at least you shouldn't be surprised it happened.
in this case, he's the gatekeeper to preventing people from doing a needle exchange program which resulted in 70+ people getting HIV.
He became governor in 2013. Unless he changed the status quo to his beliefs it's not possible for him to cause it.
but seriously this is what happens when you make health decisions based on your moral beliefs not on data supported research.
That still doesn't prove the thread title isn't bullshit. This still doesn't prove he started it either like you keep suggesting.
Wait a second...
We are giving drug addicts needles so they can get inject themselves?
Might be cheaper to give them a bullet.
Wait a second...
We are giving drug addicts needles so they can get inject themselves?
Might be cheaper to give them a bullet.
Is this a serious post? I seriously can't tell anymore.
Not serious about the bullet. But can't we find a better solution than giving them needles?
Such as?
I knew this was coming. Take all their needles maybe?
I don't see how you can be pissed at the Governor though. Two wrongs don't make a right. Just doesn't sound right to me.