DUFFMCWALIN said:I rented it today and just beat it. I know its getting a lot of flak but for a rental it was pretty good. I wanted to try the multiplayer but my rental didn't come with the card so oh well. The single player was worth playing through though.
You can play MP for "free" - just cancel out and don't enter in the code. Lets you play 'til level 5.DUFFMCWALIN said:I rented it today and just beat it. I know its getting a lot of flak but for a rental it was pretty good. I wanted to try the multiplayer but my rental didn't come with the card so oh well. The single player was worth playing through though.
KingOfKong said:outdated engine, horrible gunplay, low frame rate, and took me about 4 hrs to finish. anybody in this thread praising it is either having buyers remorse and trying to convince themselves that it isn't a turd or they work for the company that made it.
Oh ok thanks for the heads up! I guess I'll play for an hour or so then.CozMick said:You get to play multiplayer upto rank 5 as a "freebie"
KingOfKong said:outdated engine, horrible gunplay, low frame rate, and took me about 4 hrs to finish. anybody in this thread praising it is either having buyers remorse and trying to convince themselves that it isn't a turd or they work for the company that made it.
word. pretty much this. we old jaded gamers still know wassup.OldJadedGamer said:I'm neither and I got the game for free. It's fun, nothing too exctiting but not horrible either. It's a good run of the mill bored of the rest of your games kind of thing. If you can get it for a decent discount it's worth playing but I wouldn't pay full price for it.
Now that's unfair to Epic. If devs don't want to push their engine, that's the devs fault, not the engine's.KingOfKong said:outdated engine, horrible gunplay, low frame rate, and took me about 4 hrs to finish. anybody in this thread praising it is either having buyers remorse and trying to convince themselves that it isn't a turd or they work for the company that made it.
Stallion Free said:Now that's unfair to Epic. If devs don't want to push their engine, that's the devs fault, not the engine's.
Well said! The only thing really lacking are the textures. Unfortunately, textures are the first thing people see so they kind of gloss over the other technical bells & whistles if the textures are really poor.Warm Machine said:I don't think I would even say they are not pushing it. They have HDR, anamorphic flaring, all kinds of particles and atmospherics, camera level spots, then the environments are very detailed and the characters look more than acceptable. Some beautiful explosion and effects work in there too.
Peoples expectations are beginning to get away from reality. All it takes is to go back a year or two and look at games on the same engine and compare. Frontlines is no where near as lush as this game and Frontlines was actually pretty damn impressive for the time in many aspects.
Heavy said:Well said! The only thing really lacking are the textures. Unfortunately, textures are the first thing people see so they kind of gloss over the other technical bells & whistles if the textures are really poor.
I have the PC version running @1080p just a few feet away from me so that's probably why I noticed them more.Warm Machine said:I installed the game on my 360. The only time I've really noticed bad textures is when they start streaming in at the very start of the game. I have seen some bad shader/material choices where things that don't need normal maps (like the blood decal on the bus seen in screenshots in this thread) have them and they look really artificial looking.
Wow, apologies for enjoying the game.KingOfKong said:outdated engine, horrible gunplay, low frame rate, and took me about 4 hrs to finish. anybody in this thread praising it is either having buyers remorse and trying to convince themselves that it isn't a turd or they work for the company that made it.
KingOfKong said:outdated engine, horrible gunplay, low frame rate, and took me about 4 hrs to finish. anybody in this thread praising it is either having buyers remorse and trying to convince themselves that it isn't a turd or they work for the company that made it.
Deadly Cyclone said:Well, you are wrong.
The game is worth the 7's and 8's it is getting and Homefront 2 should be even better.
People need to remember CoD and BF started somewhere too...
Pylon_Trooper said:Really looking forward to getting into this one, had fun with Frontlines.
And Bamelin...your people! Your people!
bob_arctor said:Definitely saw Hooters and something called Tiger Direct. No Target though.
Uh...? Someone explain this?Spl1nter said:Battlefield 1942 - Metacritic: 89
Won multiple, multiplayer game of the year awards etc...
Call of Duty - Metacritic: 91
Won GOTY awards im quite sure
Both series started somewhere much higher up than Homefront. They both were generational games. Thats the way you create a massive FPS IP. Gears and Halo are the exact same.
Kaos will most likely be disbanded or relocated. There is no way that studio is staying in New York after 2 games that did not achieve expectations. The good news is that Homefront is not the complete clusterfuck that FFOW was.
I took one out with the starter LMGosnake said:Wow those choppers in MP make hard to survive, and no heat seeking launcher to level 34? fail.
Spl1nter said:Kaos will most likely be disbanded or relocated. There is no way that studio is staying in New York after 2 games that did not achieve expectations. The good news is that Homefront is not the complete clusterfuck that FFOW was.
Deadly Cyclone said:Who knows though, really. I just know KAOS has some awesome people who really are dedicated to making great games.
SirButterstick said:Well, when they make a good one, let us know.
After playing for a few more hours tonight, I'm done. I feel like I've seen all the I can see with this game. And it's not even that fun to begin with.
FFOW = Frontlines: Fuel of War. Kaos' first game. It was below average in terms of gameplay and everyone was disappointed that this was the best the Desert Combat guys could come up with.TacticalFox88 said:Uh...? Someone explain this?
osnake said:Wow those choppers in MP make hard to survive, and no heat seeking launcher to level 34? fail.
TacticalFox88 said:Uh...? Someone explain this?
Heavy said:Well said! The only thing really lacking are the textures. Unfortunately, textures are the first thing people see so they kind of gloss over the other technical bells & whistles if the textures are really poor.
Spl1nter said:FFOW was a bad game. What more is there to explain.
Didn't they make the Desert Combat mod for BF1942? That game was awesome.SirButterstick said:Well, when they make a good one, let us know.
After playing for a few more hours tonight, I'm done. I feel like I've seen all the I can see with this game. And it's not even that fun to begin with.
Warm Machine said:It wasn't a bad game at all. In what way was it bad? Was it the 50 player online multi? The vast array of vehicles? Huge well designed maps? Great useful and very balanced class system? The unique drone vehicles? The multiplayer ranking based on team play instead of k/d? The Frontline mechanic that forced tactical teamwork instead of lone wolf tactics? The best surround sound audio on a console game to that point eclipsing that of Bad Company? The destructible environments?
Or maybe because you never played it.