Also the combat music in that video really stands out...
The audiovisual experience gives me the same overwhelming feeling as watching the opening for the first Transformers movie.
Also the combat music in that video really stands out...
Don't if you are just going to get one game for it, though the library is very strongDo not get a ps4 for this. Do not get a ps4 for this. Do not get a ps4 for this. Damnit I'm going to get a ps4 for this aren't I ?
Putting the rest in the spoiler thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230707320&postcount=695
Also the combat music in that video really stands out...
The audiovisual experience gives me the same overwhelming feeling as watching the opening for the first Transformers movie.
At the reveal of 2015, the Thunderjaw that Aloy fought with had already been previously attacked by another group.
Is that dynamic concept still in the game?
Do not get a ps4 for this. Do not get a ps4 for this. Do not get a ps4 for this. Damnit I'm going to get a ps4 for this aren't I ?
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions
1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.
2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.
3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere ?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please
Is this on a regular PS4? :O
So 2 of those are statements.
"Those are not questions, professor".gifOk, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions
1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.
2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions
1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.
2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.
3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere ?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please
"Those are not questions, professor".gif
1) I don't think you are fighting humans for "the most part" in the main missions. Why would you even think that?
Yes he's playing on regular ps4Is this on a regular PS4? :O
"Those are not questions, professor".gif
1) I don't think you are fighting humans for "the most part" in the main missions. Why would you even think that?
Was this on Twitter or Youtube?
Putting the rest in the spoiler thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230707320&postcount=695
The outlier? It's an outlier for a reason.Some reviews did complain about this. The Eurogamer one, for example.
The outlier? It's an outlier for a reason.
I'm not saying I agree with it or anything. Just pointing out that some people did find this a problem. Being an outlier doesn't invalidate what someone says.
Why don't you find out for yourself when the game releases?
Well statistically speaking there are times when you can disregard an outlier. Having said that I, have made my position on Eurogamer and USgamer clear in the review thread (which is that they are as valid as any other review). You can go read it.I'm not saying I agree with it or anything. Just pointing out that some people did find this a problem. Being an outlier doesn't invalidate what someone says.
Why don't you find out for yourself when the game releases?
Is this on a regular PS4? :O
I doubt the IQ is that good on the OG.
Yes he's playing on regular ps4
I wonder what kind of blood ritual or sacrifice they did to achieve this. Maybe axing GG Cambridge was their equivalent ofWhen people start doubting if this is on the original PS4 or Pro, you know you have magic.
I wonder what kind of blood ritual or sacrifice they did to achieve this. Maybe axing GG Cambridge was their equivalent ofthe eclipse from berserk lol
I guess, but when 50 people say one thing and 1 person says another, 99% of the time the 50 are right and will mirror most everyone elses experience.
Well statistically speaking there are times when you can disregard an outlier. Having said that I, have made my position on Eurogamer and USgamer clear in the review thread (which is that they are as valid as any other review). You can go read it.
Reviewers and gaffers have said the human AI is clearly not as good as robot AIs. I don't dispute that, specially when so many are saying it. But how many are saying "man, I wish I was not fighting mostly boring humans in the main missions". In this case if one or two reviewer complains about it but over 70 others don't than I will disregard it as outlier(s).
The whole thing is opinions, though. There is no "99% of the time 50 are right". Nobody is wrong, nobody is right. It's just opinions. Opinions you may or may not agree with.
Opinion can be swayed by personal circumstances and tastes, so maybe the "outliers" just weren't in the right place when they played it; but regardless of that it's still their opinion.
The EG guy says that human encounters in main missions were numerous and tedious while many others didn't complain about that – perhaps this critic had less time to play so mainlined the central quest and got fatigue, while other critics had more time to free-roam or sidequest? Perhaps he encountered more dull AI routines by chance?
Who knows, but there's no way we can call it invalid.
Anyway, we should really get some early impression folk in here to chime in
I wonder what kind of blood ritual or sacrifice they did to achieve this. Maybe axing GG Cambridge was their equivalent ofthe eclipse from berserk lol
Obviously, and I stated my opinion on theirs. Nothing more or less.
I wonder what kind of blood ritual or sacrifice they did to achieve this. Maybe axing GG Cambridge was their equivalent ofthe eclipse from berserk lol
I love how the hacked robot also helped with the battle. And was that another robot that joined the battle near the end of the video?
On what difficulty was this?
i'm super excited for this game now but it clashes with zelda. two amazing games i'm looking forward to but not enough time for both
I read a few reviews but saw nothing of quest design, branching paths, or how the mechanics effect quests. Impressions?
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions
1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.
2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.
3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere ?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please
Did you read just 1 review?
1.
3.Yes...
Did read what I wrote? Did I say their review is invalid? I merely said that they can write the review that they think is correct and I will exercise my right to judge it's content by comparing it to others. And in this case concluding that fighting mainly human AI in the main missions is not an issue. That is my conclusion.The whole thing is opinions, though. There is no "99% of the time 50 are right". Nobody is wrong, nobody is right. It's just opinions. Opinions you may or may not agree with.
Opinion can be swayed by personal circumstances and tastes, so maybe the "outliers" just weren't in the right place when they played it; but regardless of that it's still their opinion.
The EG guy says that human encounters in main missions were numerous and tedious while many others didn't complain about that perhaps this critic had less time to play so mainlined the central quest and got fatigue, while other critics had more time to free-roam or sidequest? Perhaps he encountered more dull AI routines by chance?
Who knows, but there's no way we can call it invalid.
Anyway, we should really get some early impression folk in here to chime in
PS i'm not a big fan of EG or USG or anything, I don't really care for reviews. I worked as a journalist/reviewer once and after seeing what it's like I decided I'd rather make my own mind up and do things for my own enjoyment.
1. Not really, or it's a mix.
2. Maybe two types but trust me they are insignificant compared to majority of the game.
3.Yes...
Good game, but brings nothing new to the table. Played it for around 30 hours, loved graphics, long range fights, traps, stealth and 2nd half of the story. Hated melee combat, boring dialogues, kinda repetetive side activities and the fact that cities feel "dead". There are tons of characters but they just looks like a classic filler. Plus you can't even push them - they just stand there like a wall, barely reacting to anything you do. It annoys the shit out of me even though I know it's not a big issue.
I wonder what kind of blood ritual or sacrifice they did to achieve this. Maybe axing GG Cambridge was their equivalent ofthe eclipse from berserk lol
This made me laugh way more than it should .
Still this game has to be almost the peak for open world games gfx this gen.
Oh and yes on regular PS4. This game is a technical marvel.
Good game, but brings nothing new to the table. Played it for around 30 hours, loved graphics, long range fights, traps, stealth and 2nd half of the story. Hated melee combat, boring dialogues, kinda repetetive side activities and the fact that cities feel "dead". There are tons of characters but they just looks like a classic filler. Plus you can't even push them - they just stand there like a wall, barely reacting to anything you do. It annoys the shit out of me even though I know it's not a big issue.
Did read what I wrote? Did I say their review is invalid? I merely said that they can write the review that they think is correct and I will exercise my right to judge it's content by comparing it to others. And in this case concluding that fighting mainly human AI in the main missions is not an issue. That is my conclusion.