Tschumi
Member
I'm a fanboy of both companies, this is purely a question of imitation being a hella profitable form of flattery.
I'm totally ignorant about the story around these mice, this is an opinion thread, if you know what's up tell me, don't flame me!
For me, the Logitech G502 is the beginning and the end. I've been chain using them since they first came out. I love no other mouse. Whenever one dies (read: the early models' knitted cord frayed) i get a new one.
But, Lo! A Razer mouse exists which appears to be a barefaced copy, with a few minor tweaks to ergonomics, weight and hardware.
Which came first? I believe the first iteration of the Logitech G502 came out in 2014. The Basilisk Ultimate in 2019.
So, look, this is superficial and subjective I know, but the extent to which Razer appears to have done an absolutely rank bit of copy catting of Logitech here is as nauseating as it is confusing.
Why did they do it? Why didn't they just make their own design, as they already have done, to amazing affect, many times? What is their excuse? Do they ever acknowledge this? Why? Why not?
I am big on Razer. My first razer was a razer Krait back in 2005 or 6 or 7 or something. It was ballin'. I've got a Razer Blade 14 in the mail to me AND I dropped way too much on a limited edition Cyberpunk Death Adder Extreme or whatever it's called, because I'm going to be doing a lot of wireless work on my 4k tv as a second screen. SO I'M NOT SHITTING ON RAZER.
I'm just asking this question: How am I supposed to feel about this clear bit of shameless imitation?
(if you want to type "feel how you wanna feel ay dun' give ey FOCK" you can turn in your "a forum is for the free exchange of opinions" certification at the door on your way out)
I'm totally ignorant about the story around these mice, this is an opinion thread, if you know what's up tell me, don't flame me!
For me, the Logitech G502 is the beginning and the end. I've been chain using them since they first came out. I love no other mouse. Whenever one dies (read: the early models' knitted cord frayed) i get a new one.
Feast your eyes on the greatest gaming (and design) mouse I've ever encountered. And i prefer having all the weights in.
But, Lo! A Razer mouse exists which appears to be a barefaced copy, with a few minor tweaks to ergonomics, weight and hardware.
Seriously, take your pick. It's got little arrows to either side of the scroll wheel, it's got two buttons wristward of that wheel and if the nearest one doesn't unlock the wheel spin I'll eat a shoe, it's got virtually the same division lines on the palm section and presumably as many of the same thumb buttons at they thought they could get away with. The grip on the thumb rest is even lifted from the G502 Lightspeed model. It's got the same slightly extruding finger buttons, sightly broader perhaps but i never found the Logitech to feel cramped...
Which came first? I believe the first iteration of the Logitech G502 came out in 2014. The Basilisk Ultimate in 2019.
So, look, this is superficial and subjective I know, but the extent to which Razer appears to have done an absolutely rank bit of copy catting of Logitech here is as nauseating as it is confusing.
Why did they do it? Why didn't they just make their own design, as they already have done, to amazing affect, many times? What is their excuse? Do they ever acknowledge this? Why? Why not?
I am big on Razer. My first razer was a razer Krait back in 2005 or 6 or 7 or something. It was ballin'. I've got a Razer Blade 14 in the mail to me AND I dropped way too much on a limited edition Cyberpunk Death Adder Extreme or whatever it's called, because I'm going to be doing a lot of wireless work on my 4k tv as a second screen. SO I'M NOT SHITTING ON RAZER.
I'm just asking this question: How am I supposed to feel about this clear bit of shameless imitation?
(if you want to type "feel how you wanna feel ay dun' give ey FOCK" you can turn in your "a forum is for the free exchange of opinions" certification at the door on your way out)