Fbh
Member
Absolutely. More than almost anything else in the industry.
That said, I'd much rather get a Sekiro 2 or something new over Elden Ring 2.
Neightreign isn't really a GAAS.
There are no micro transactions, battle passes or any way to spend money on the game after buying it. You can also play it offline.
It's basically just a co-op focused game with a finite amount of content.
You wouldn't call Split Fiction a flop just because it didn't retain a huge player number, right?
As of September it was still in the top 10 highest grossing games for the year (at least in the US). And given how like 95% of it was made with recycled assets it was probably hugely profitable for them.
				
			That said, I'd much rather get a Sekiro 2 or something new over Elden Ring 2.
Obviously, yes. But Im not sure what they are thinking after Nightreign, which I dont regret not playing. I dont know if it has flopped or not. it sold a lot of copies at launch. In terms of players, it looks like the game is on a downward slope just from googling player numbers. Im not sure how trustworthy these sources are:
ELDEN RING NIGHTREIGN - Steam Charts
An ongoing analysis of Steam's player numbers, seeing what's been played the most.steamcharts.com
![]()
ELDEN RING NIGHTREIGN Steam Charts - Live Player Count
Players right now: 12,503. All-time peak: 311,712. Find ELDEN RING NIGHTREIGN statistics: steam charts, concurrent players, monthly breakdown, and more.steamplayercount.com
But it looks like another live service game flop. And they are making one more for the SW2.
Neightreign isn't really a GAAS.
There are no micro transactions, battle passes or any way to spend money on the game after buying it. You can also play it offline.
It's basically just a co-op focused game with a finite amount of content.
You wouldn't call Split Fiction a flop just because it didn't retain a huge player number, right?
As of September it was still in the top 10 highest grossing games for the year (at least in the US). And given how like 95% of it was made with recycled assets it was probably hugely profitable for them.
			
				Last edited: