Yeah, that I rememberI tossed some centage at the Two Tribes weekly to get hassle-free direct downloads since I already owned the games on Steam, and I totally understand why they wagged a finger at me there. But outside of that...if cicero says it's been there for months, maybe it's just that I bought in at the $6 tier for all the other weekly bundles.It used to be when you paid less than dollar (in the good old days)
Kind of weird that a bundle that was originally all about DRM-free games is adding yet another system to restrict what you can do with the games you buy.
Honestly, I love it. It includes all the original levels as unlockables (with the original music) and the new stages slot in perfectly. 48 levels in all, with hidden secrets to find. It's really good.
Oh I thought they simply redesigned the levels and changed the music for no reason...but if everything I loved is actually in there then I'm in. Thank you!
Are these games worth getting? Seriously considering it, but not sure yet.
Is Alien Breed multiplayer?
I don't understand people who are saying they'll stop participating. If you feel bad about paying for doubles you already have, the whole thing's set up so that you can adjust your price accordingly. If you feel bad that you can't give keys to friends, just gift them the whole shebang for whatever you're willing to spend to help them out, go so far as to show your disapproval by giving a nickel or whatever, but the end result is ultimately the same.
The principle? We're talking about dirt cheap games with proceeds going to charity. I dont think there's a lot of room to complain.
I can't believe that some people actually don't like Steam so much that they will avoid buying cheap games because the games only activate on Steam. Why so adverse?
Well, there are always going to be people who dislike Steam, but mostly this thread is about people calling other people out over a false sense of entitlement (for things they are actually entitled to).Uh, have you read the thread?
People are disappointed that they can't give away keys for games they already own. To them those games in the bundle are essentially wasted. There are also concerns about linking a Humble account to Steam is a subtle form of DRM.
It has nothing to do with disliking Steam.
It's people who bought multiple key packs then posted them one by one for sale at a profit on eBay
Time to link them to this topic.
I can't even redeem the games now, the link won't open. Nice.
I hope if they go back to keys they allow you to still link via just a click if you want. Basically give both options.
I can't even redeem the games now, the link won't open. Nice.
I have to wonder why they don't just restrict the amount of $1 bundles that each person/individual payment method can purchase per bundle. I would think that would solve a large portion of the reselling problem, if that is indeed the main issue here.
What "principle" are you exactly fighting for here?The price is not the issue its the principle.
it's why I still buy most of my media physically
It's a multitude of issues
Bonus games no longer for first week buyers
This makes humble bundle far less attractive.
And stopped a few moochers from spending $1 of their own. Sounds like HB lost no business. Maybe one dollar.I own all but Superfrog, shame because I would have bought it and just gave out the keys...
What's this?
Now you need to beat the average to get the second set of games. Before you got them no matter what if you bought the bundle before they added more games to it.
What "principle" are you exactly fighting for here?
The "principle" of ignoring their explicit, yet polite, request to use keys for only your own individual use seeing as the developers were allowing them to sell games on the name your price model?
The "principle" of explicitly taking advantage of that model to buy games in a bundle for a very modest price, far below standard retail, below even steep sale prices, then turn around and give away portions of that bundle, thus letting "friends" avoid helping the developers, charities, and Humble Bundle by buying - at a price point for which there are no reasonable price-based objections - the bundle?
Those "principles," while they may have been legally proper and technically possible, were never the intent of the Humble Bundles. The principle they care about is supporting developers and charities through their promotions. Getting rid of the free riders (the technical term for someone who gets a game for free from someone following your "principles") advances the principle that their trying to advance.
======
Another thing here, we should all be clear here on another point... no one is buying a game with these bundles, you're purchasing a license to access a game. I don't like it any better than anyone else - it's why I still buy most of my media physically - but the "I should get to do what I want with what I bought!" complaints unfortunately just don't fit with reality.
What "principle" are you exactly fighting for here?
The "principle" of ignoring their explicit, yet polite, request to use keys for only your own individual use seeing as the developers were allowing them to sell games on the name your price model?
The "principle" of explicitly taking advantage of that model to buy games in a bundle for a very modest price, far below standard retail, below even steep sale prices, then turn around and give away portions of that bundle, thus letting "friends" avoid helping the developers, charities, and Humble Bundle by buying - at a price point for which there are no reasonable price-based objections - the bundle?
Those "principles," while they may have been legally proper and technically possible, were never the intent of the Humble Bundles. The principle they care about is supporting developers and charities through their promotions. Getting rid of the free riders (the technical term for someone who gets a game for free from someone following your "principles") advances the principle that their trying to advance.
======
Another thing here, we should all be clear here on another point... no one is buying a game with these bundles, you're purchasing a license to access a game. I don't like it any better than anyone else - it's why I still buy most of my media physically - but the "I should get to do what I want with what I bought!" complaints unfortunately just don't fit with reality.
But when you have cable channels you don't want, you can't bring the price of the package down to whatever you feel like paying. This is why I think they're justified with this. Anyone who feels like they're missing value because they can't give codes away can just lower their price (and maybe use the money they took off to buy another gift package for someone...)Of course, the price is choose your own, so that means I must be taking advantage of it (no idea how that's even possible) by paying the minimum. Definitely dude.
Of course, people are doing something that you, personally, don't think is what they should do with it (who are you to tell them what they can and can't do with their property?) so they should remove the rights of all the other consumers. Great idea bud.
If one of their principles isn't "to provide the best product for their consumers" then it reduces the values of their product because they're not selling a product anymore with which you're free to do what you want. They're selling you something akin to a cable subscription. You want X? You gotta buy A, B, C, and D as well. They're perfectly within their rights to do that, but it without a doubt reduces the value of the product, to a point that I feel it isn't what they should do.
But when you have cable channels you don't want, you can't bring the price of the package down to whatever you feel like paying. This is why I think they're justified with this. Anyone who feels like they're missing value because they can't give codes away can just lower their price (and maybe use the money they took off to buy another gift package for someone...)
I never said that.Of course, the price is choose your own, so that means I must be taking advantage of it (no idea how that's even possible) by paying the minimum. Definitely dude.
It had nothing to do with what I think, it has to do with what Humble wants to sell you.Of course, people are doing something that you, personally, don't think is what they should do with it (who are you to tell them what they can and can't do with their property?) so they should remove the rights of all the other consumers. Great idea bud.
Even now, Humble Bundles are a ridiculous value. If you know of a better value, I'd love to hear it. And how much "value" does an individual really get from giving away a game?If one of their principles isn't "to provide the best product for their consumers" then it reduces the values of their product because they're not selling a product anymore with which you're free to do what you want. They're selling you something akin to a cable subscription. You want X? You gotta buy A, B, C, and D as well. They're perfectly within their rights to do that, but it without a doubt reduces the value of the product, to a point that I feel it isn't what they should do.