ftfy
I would be laughing if I weren't already crying.
ftfy
It's not in fifth place, it's tied for 2nd, with 3 others.So far, Irma is in 5th place for winds and isn't even in the top 10 in pressure. This goes back to 1935 to 2007.
The OP itself says it is the most powerful storm formed in the Alantic Ocean.
What are your sources?
Ohhh... so Bloomberg doesn't provide a source, so it must be true?
Here's what I am going with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlantic_hurricane_records
According to the NWS, Irma is the strongest storm ever in the Atlantic (not counting those that reached the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico).
It's also breaking records for how long it is staying at those speeds.
Scientist paid by (((SOROS))), no doubt..😒
32+ hours at 180+ mph. Previous record was Allen in 1980, with 18 hours.
It's not in fifth place, it's tied for 2nd, with 3 others.
But Irma is breaking other records. One of the fastest at landfall. It's also breaking records for how long it is staying at those speeds.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-hea...an-florida-keys-puerto-rico-wind-speed-record
According to the NWS, Irma is the strongest storm ever in the Atlantic (not counting those that reached the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico)
Scientist paid by (((SOROS))), no doubt..😒
Is it simply saying, ALL hurricanes are stronger than they would otherwise be due to climate change? /shrugs
I'm always curious how scientific fact is considered political.
The OP itself says it is the most powerful storm formed in the Alantic Ocean
How do I know Hurricane Irma is even real and not a hoax by the left?
Basically, breaking off as much detail needed to give it a point. Anyways... it's a strong hurricane, and it's a major threat to anything in its path. Climate change may or may not have anything to do with it. There have been weaker threats, and there have been "tied" threats, and more powerful threats. This is real world, and it's going to continue like this, well, forever I'm guessing. What's the idea here? When it's a strong hurricane, climate change probably made it that way? If it's a weaker hurricane, there wasn't any climate change that week? Is it simply saying, ALL hurricanes are stronger than they would otherwise be due to climate change? /shrugs
What's the idea behind this?
ftfy
I was gonna just post a thread myself after reading this:
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...epic-size-is-being-fuelled-by-global-warming/
This is a subject that needs to be talked about. Here in Sweden, Swedish National Television (SVT) news just ran with a story how the US. government is silencing the use of the word climate change and that the coverage of the topic in news is decreasing. How many of these storms is the US. gonna need to be hit with until the country admits this is a real thing? The ironic part is even how many will probably hit the south states of all places, the biggest supporters of the Republican and their climate change denying asses.
Worst of all are the Caribbean nations who will suffer the most from the US. denial.
What are they doing? But Climate Change is talked about all the time on the news, I dont know what channels SVT is watching, even anyone going to CBS instantly sees climate change articles https://www.cbsnews.com/climate-change/ recent.
Also, I dont understand your "how many of these storms is the US Gonna need to be hit" when we just ended the 4,323-day (142-month, 12-year) major hurricane drought, which makes this whole, "irma is a result of climate change" argument pretty odd, when where was the category 4 or 5 hurricane in the years with the most record temperatures recorded? Is climate change not to blame for the absence of those types of storms reaching our shores? Its not like America has never been hit with a major hurricane ever.